scholarly journals A strategy to implement a chronic obstructive pulmonary disease discharge care bundle on a large scale

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 198-201
Author(s):  
Louise Sewell ◽  
Sally Schreder ◽  
Michael Steiner ◽  
Sally J Singh
2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. e000265 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria B Ospina ◽  
Marta Michas ◽  
Lesly Deuchar ◽  
Richard Leigh ◽  
Mohit Bhutani ◽  
...  

IntroductionHospital and emergency department discharge for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is often poorly organised. We developed a patient-centred, evidence-based and consensus-based discharge care bundle for patients with acute exacerbations of COPD.MethodsA purposeful sample of clinicians and patients were invited to participate in a two-round Delphi study (July–November 2015). In round 1, participants rated on a seven-point Likert scale (1=not at all important; 7=extremely important) the importance of 29 unique COPD care actions. Round 2 comprised items selected from round 1 based on consensus (>80% endorsement for Likert values 5–7). A list of 18 care items from round 2 was discussed in a face-to-face nominal group meeting.ResultsSeven care items were included in the COPD discharge bundle based on clinician and patient input: (1) ensure adequate inhaler technique is demonstrated; (2) send discharge summary to family physician and arrange follow-up; (3) optimise and reconcile prescription of respiratory medications; (4) provide a written discharge management plan and assess patient’s and caregiver’s comprehension of discharge instructions; (5) refer to pulmonary rehabilitation; (6) screen for frailty and comorbidities; and (7) assess smoking status, provide counselling and refer to smoking cessation programme.ConclusionWe present a seven-item, patient-centred, evidence-based and consensus-based discharge bundle for patients with acute exacerbations of COPD. Alignment with clinical practice guidelines and feasibility of local adaptations of the bundle should be explored to facilitate wide applicability and evaluation of the effectiveness of the COPD discharge bundle.


2020 ◽  
Vol 48 (8) ◽  
pp. 030006052094550
Author(s):  
Jia Yang ◽  
Junchao Yang

Objective This study aimed to evaluate the effect of clearing heat and resolving phlegm for acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with the syndrome of phlegm-heat obstruction of the lung. Methods This was a real-world retrospective cohort study of inpatients at our institution from 1 January 2015 to 31 December 2017. The patients were divided into two groups according to whether they received oral traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) for clearing heat and resolving phlegm or routine treatment (controls). Efficacy and safety indicators were analyzed. Propensity score matching was used to control for confounding factors. Results Among 488 patients, 164 (82 pairs) were successfully matched. The changes in neutrophils (%) and C-reactive protein levels were more significant in the TCM group than in the control group. The duration of fever was significantly shorter in the TCM group than in the control group. Conclusions The therapy of clearing heat and resolving phlegm might effectively control the inflammatory reaction of acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in patients with the syndrome of phlegm-heat obstruction of the lung, especially for those with fever. Nevertheless, large-scale and prospective studies are required to provide a higher quality of evidence.


2020 ◽  
Vol 40 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Xi-Juan Zhang ◽  
Zhong-Hua Cui ◽  
Yan Dong ◽  
Xiu-Wen Liang ◽  
Yan-Xin Zhao ◽  
...  

Abstract Osteoporosis (OP) is significant and debilitating comorbidity of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). We hypothesize that genetic variance identified with OP may also play roles in COPD. We have conducted a large-scale relation data analysis to explore the genes implicated with either OP or COPD, or both. Each gene linked to OP but not to COPD was further explored in a mega-analysis and partial mega-analysis of 15 independently collected COPD RNA expression datasets, followed by gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) and literature-based pathway analysis to explore their functional linked to COPD. A multiple linear regression (MLR) model was built to study the possible influence of sample size, population region, and study date on the gene expression data in COPD. At the first step of the analysis, we have identified 918 genes associated with COPD, 581 with OP, and a significant overlap (P<2.30e-140; 210 overlapped genes). Partial mega-analysis showed that, one OP gene, GPNMB presented significantly increased expression in COPD patients (P-value = 0.0018; log fold change = 0.83). GPNMB was enriched in multiple COPD pathways and plays roles as a gene hub formulating multiple vicious COPD pathways included gene MMP9 and MYC. GPNMB could be a novel gene that plays roles in both COPD and OP. Partial mega-analysis is valuable in identify case-specific genes for COPD.


2019 ◽  
pp. 089719001988944 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anthony J. Gentene ◽  
Maria Rose Guido ◽  
Brittany Woolf ◽  
Amber Dalhover ◽  
Timmi Anne Boesken ◽  
...  

Background: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a major contributor of morbidity and mortality in the United States resulting in high hospitalization and readmission rates. For health systems, identifying an effective strategy to reduce COPD readmissions has remained difficult. Multiple COPD care bundles have been developed with varying degrees of success. Bundles that were multidisciplinary and included pharmacists were successful in reducing readmissions. Objective: To describe and assess a multidisciplinary, 5-element, COPD care bundle that was implemented in an academic, urban safety-net hospital to reduce COPD readmissions and the role of pharmacists in bundle implementation. Methods: A multidisciplinary team collaborated to develop a 5-element COPD care bundle that met unmet patient needs. The bundle elements included the following, with pharmacy responsible for the first two: optimization of COPD inhalers, 30-day supply of insurance-compatible inhalers, individualized patient inhaler teaching, provision of standardized discharge instructions, and scheduling of a 15-day discharge follow-up appointment. Bundle was implemented with multiple Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles to develop intra- and interdepartment processes. Results: Prior to bundle implementation, the health system COPD readmission rates were 22.7%. Reliable implementation of the bundle reduced readmissions to 14.7% over a 6-month period. Pharmacy adherence to completion of the bundle was over 95% over 2 years of bundle use. Conclusion: Pharmacists have a crucial role in hospital-based transitions of care to reduce COPD readmissions.


2018 ◽  
Vol 16 ◽  
pp. 147997311881569 ◽  
Author(s):  
Preyanate Wilairat ◽  
Kirati Kengkla ◽  
Chaiyawat Thayawiwat ◽  
Phongsathorn Phlaisaithong ◽  
Supakorn Somboonmee ◽  
...  

To examine clinical outcomes of theophylline use in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) receiving inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) and long-acting beta-2 agonists (LABA). Electronic data from five hospitals located in Northern Thailand between January 2011 and December 2015 were retrospectively collected. Propensity score (PS) matching (2:1 ratio) technique was used to minimize confounding factors. The primary outcome was overall exacerbations. Secondary outcomes were exacerbation not leading to hospital admission, hospitalization for exacerbation, hospitalization for pneumonia, and all-cause hospitalizations. Cox’s proportional hazards models were used to estimate adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). After PS matching, of 711 patients with COPD (mean age: 70.1 years; 74.4% male; 60.8% severe airflow obstruction), 474 theophylline users and 237 non-theophylline users were included. Mean follow-up time was 2.26 years. Theophylline significantly increased the risk of overall exacerbation (aHR: 1.48, 95% CI: 1.11–1.96; p = 0.008) and exacerbation not leading to hospital admission (aHR: 1.47, 95% CI: 1.06–2.03; p = 0.020). Theophylline use did not significantly increase the risk of hospitalization for exacerbation (aHR: 1.11, 95% CI: 0.79–1.58; p = 0.548), hospitalization for pneumonia (aHR: 1.28, 95% CI: 0.89–1.84; p = 0.185), and all-cause hospitalizations (aHR: 1.03, 95% CI: 0.80–1.33; p = 0.795). Theophylline use as add-on therapy to ICS and LABA might be associated with an increased risk for overall exacerbation in patients with COPD. A large-scale prospective study of theophylline use investigating both safety and efficacy is warranted.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document