Insecticide Susceptibility Profile of Malaria Vector Populations from the Coastal and Mainland Areas of Akwa Ibom State, Nigeria

Development of resistance by different malaria vector populations to insecticides has become a big threat to malaria vector elimination. This study evaluated the susceptibility of Anopheles mosquito populations in Akwa Ibom State, Nigeria to permethrin (0.75%), deltamethrin (0.5%), lambdacyhalothrin (0.5%), alphacypermethrin (0.75%), Dichlorodiphenyltrichloethane (DDT), propoxur, bendiocarb and pirimiphosmethylin in World Health Organization (WHO) test tubes following standard protocols. The mosquitoes were obtained as aquatic forms and reared under laboratory conditions to adults. The adults were subjected to WHO susceptibility bioassays following standard procedures. Malaria vectors across the study sites were resistant to permethrin, deltamethrin, lambdacyhalothrin and alphacypermethrin insecticides. Full susceptibility to propoxur and bendiocarb was recorded across the sites. Full susceptibility to pirimiphosmethyl was recorded in populations from three sites. Nevertheless, population of the malaria vectors collected from Oron was resistant to pirimiphosmethyl. KDT50 and KDT95 estimated for each insecticide using a log-time probit model revealed that knockdown was more rapid for deltamethrin, lambdacyhalothrin, alphacypermethrin, propoxur, bendiocarb and pirimiphosmethyl than for DDT and permethrin across the study sites. Morphological identification of all the mosquito samples used revealed that they were female Anopheles gambiae s.l. Sustained susceptibility of malaria vectors to pyrethriod is necessary for successful malaria control with insecticide treated nets and Indoor Residual Spraying (IRS). Emergence of focal points with insecticide resistance gives serious concern especially with the scale-up in distribution of pyrethriod treated nets to these areas. This may increase selection pressures due to overexposure. Further study to identify the exact resistance mechanism(s) of malaria vectors from these sites is recommended.

Download Full-text

Quantifying and characterizing hourly human exposure to malaria vectors bites in rural southwest Burkina Faso

10.1101/2019.12.17.19014845 ◽

2019 ◽

Author(s):

D.D Soma ◽

B Zogo ◽

P Taconet ◽

A Somé ◽

S Coulibaly ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Burkina Faso ◽

Vector Control ◽

Rural Area ◽

Malaria Vector ◽

Human Exposure ◽

Protective Efficacy ◽

Indoor Residual Spraying ◽

World Health ◽

Malaria Vectors ◽

Malaria Vector Control

AbstractBackgroundTo sustain the efficacy of malaria vector control, the World Health Organization (WHO) recommends the combination of effective tools. Before designing and implementing additional strategies in any setting, it is critical to monitor or predict when and where transmission occurs. However, to date, very few studies have quantified the behavioural interactions between humans and Anopheles vectors. Here, we characterized residual transmission in a rural area of Burkina Faso where long lasting insecticidal nets (LLIN) are widely used.MethodsWe analysed data on both human and malaria vectors behaviours from 27 villages to measure hourly human exposure to vector bites in dry and rainy seasons using mathematical models. We estimated the protective efficacy of LLINs and characterised where (indoors vs. outdoors) and when both LLIN users and non-users were exposed to vector bites.ResultsThe percentage of the population who declared sleeping under a LLIN the previous night was very high regardless of the season, with an average LLIN use ranging from 92.43% to 99.89%. The use of LLIN provided > 80% protection against exposure to vector bites. The proportion of exposure for LLIN users was 29-57% after 05:00 and 0.05-12 % before 20:00. More than 80% of exposure occurred indoors for LLIN users and the estimate reached 90% for children under five years old in the dry cold season.ConclusionsThis study supports the current use of LLIN as a primary malaria vector control tool. It also emphasises the need to complement LLIN with indoor-implemented measures such as indoor residual spraying (IRS) and/or house improvement to effectively combat malaria in the rural area of Diébougou. Furthermore, malaria elimination programmes would also require strategies that target outdoor biting vectors to be successful in the area.

Download Full-text

Bionomics and ecology of Anopheles merus along the East and Southern Africa coast

Parasites & Vectors ◽

10.1186/s13071-021-04582-z ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 14 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Brian Bartilol ◽

Irene Omedo ◽

Charles Mbogo ◽

Joseph Mwangangi ◽

Martin K. Rono

Keyword(s):

Malaria Transmission ◽

Mosquito Species ◽

Scale Up ◽

Indoor Residual Spraying ◽

Temporal Distribution ◽

Malaria Vectors ◽

Behavioural Plasticity ◽

Insecticide Treated Nets ◽

Resting Behaviour ◽

Residual Malaria Transmission

AbstractMalaria transmission persists despite the scale-up of interventions such as long-lasting insecticide-treated nets (LLINs) and indoor residual spraying (IRS). Understanding the entomological drivers of transmission is key for the design of effective and sustainable tools to address the challenge. Recent research findings indicate a shift in vector populations from the notorious Anopheles gambiae (s.s.) as a dominant vector to other species as one of the factors contributing to the persistence of malaria transmission. However, there are gaps in the literature regarding the minor vector species which are increasingly taking a lead role in malaria transmission. Currently, minor malaria vectors have behavioural plasticity, which allows their evasion of vector control tools currently in use. To address this, we have reviewed the role of Anopheles merus, a saltwater mosquito species that is becoming an important vector of malaria transmission along the East and Southern African coast. We performed a literature review from PubMed and Google Scholar and reviewed over 50 publications relating to An. merus's bionomics, taxonomy, spatial-temporal distribution and role in malaria transmission. We found that An. merus is an important vector of malaria and that it contributes to residual malaria transmission because of its exophilic tendencies, insecticide resistance and densities that peak during the dry seasons as the freshwater mosquitoes decline. Spatial and temporal studies have also shown that this species has increased its geographical range, densities and vectorial capacity over time. In this review, we highlight the resting behaviour and breeding habitats of this mosquito, which could be targeted for surveillance studies and control interventions.

Download Full-text

The Efficacy of Vectron 20 WP, Etofenprox, for Indoor Residual Spraying in Areas of High Vector Resistance to Pyrethroids and Organochlorines in Zambia

ISRN Preventive Medicine ◽

10.5402/2013/371934 ◽

2013 ◽

Vol 2013 ◽

pp. 1-6 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Emmanuel Chanda ◽

Alister Kandyata ◽

Javan Chanda ◽

Faustina N. Phiri ◽

Lucy Muzia ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Insecticide Resistance ◽

World Health Organization ◽

Indoor Residual Spraying ◽

Control Programme ◽

World Health ◽

Malaria Vectors ◽

Insecticide Treated Nets ◽

Lambda Cyhalothrin ◽

Residual Efficacy ◽

Health Organization

The selection of insecticide resistance in malaria vectors has the potential to compromise any insecticide-based vector control programme. To ensure that the insecticides used for indoor residual spraying and insecticide-treated nets in Zambia remain effective and their choice is evidence based, insecticide resistance surveillance and monitoring are essential. This study assessed and compared the residual efficacy of etofenprox (Vectron 20 WP), an ether pyrethroid, at 0.1 g/m2 with pyrethroids: bifenthrin (Bistar 10 WP) and lambda-cyhalothrin (Icon 10 CS) at 25 mg/m2 for indoor residual spraying. We also assessed the resistance status of etofenprox to local malaria vectors, An. funestus s.s and An. gambiae s.s, using World Health Organization standard protocols. The residual efficacy of Vectron 20 WP on cement, rendered walls of houses lasted for four months with 100% mortality. By the eighth month, the killing effect had reduced to 73.8% compared to 63.3% for bifenthrin and 77.0% for lambda-cyhalothrin. Susceptibility tests using standard World Health Organization assays on An. gambiae s.s showed susceptibility to etofenprox (0.1%) but some resistance was detected to Anopheles funestus s.s. The product is recommended as an ideal insecticide for indoor residual spraying for malaria control in Zambia as part of a resistance management programme in selected areas of the country.

Download Full-text

Malaria vector species composition and entomological indices following indoor residual spraying in regions bordering Lake Victoria, Tanzania

Malaria Journal ◽

10.1186/s12936-020-03452-w ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 19 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Charles Kakilla ◽

Alphaxard Manjurano ◽

Karen Nelwin ◽

Jackline Martin ◽

Fabian Mashauri ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Species Composition ◽

Vector Control ◽

Malaria Vector ◽

Lake Victoria ◽

Indoor Residual Spraying ◽

Transmission Risk ◽

Malaria Vectors ◽

Vector Species ◽

Sporozoite Rate ◽

Pirimiphos Methyl

Abstract Background Vector control through long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) and focal indoor residual spraying (IRS) is a major component of the Tanzania national malaria control strategy. In mainland Tanzania, IRS has been conducted annually around Lake Victoria basin since 2007. Due to pyrethroid resistance in malaria vectors, use of pyrethroids for IRS was phased out and from 2014 to 2017 pirimiphos-methyl (Actellic® 300CS) was sprayed in regions of Kagera, Geita, Mwanza, and Mara. Entomological surveillance was conducted in 10 sprayed and 4 unsprayed sites to determine the impact of IRS on entomological indices related to malaria transmission risk. Methods WHO cone bioassays were conducted monthly on interior house walls to determine residual efficacy of pirimiphos-methyl CS. Indoor CDC light traps with or without bottle rotator were hung next to protected sleepers indoors and also set outdoors (unbaited) as a proxy measure for indoor and outdoor biting rate and time of biting. Prokopack aspirators were used indoors to capture resting malaria vectors. A sub-sample of Anopheles was tested by PCR to determine species identity and ELISA for sporozoite rate. Results Annual IRS with Actellic® 300CS from 2015 to 2017 was effective on sprayed walls for a mean of 7 months in cone bioassay. PCR of 2016 and 2017 samples showed vector populations were predominantly Anopheles arabiensis (58.1%, n = 4,403 IRS sites, 58%, n = 2,441 unsprayed sites). There was a greater proportion of Anopheles funestus sensu stricto in unsprayed sites (20.4%, n = 858) than in sprayed sites (7.9%, n = 595) and fewer Anopheles parensis (2%, n = 85 unsprayed, 7.8%, n = 591 sprayed). Biting peaks of Anopheles gambiae sensu lato (s.l.) followed periods of rainfall occurring between October and April, but were generally lower in sprayed sites than unsprayed. In most sprayed sites, An. gambiae s.l. indoor densities increased between January and February, i.e., 10–12 months after IRS. The predominant species An. arabiensis had a sporozoite rate in 2017 of 2.0% (95% CI 1.4–2.9) in unsprayed sites compared to 0.8% (95% CI 0.5–1.3) in sprayed sites (p = 0.003). Sporozoite rates were also lower for An. funestus collected in sprayed sites. Conclusion This study contributes to the understanding of malaria vector species composition, behaviour and transmission risk following IRS around Lake Victoria and can be used to guide malaria vector control strategies in Tanzania.

Download Full-text

Creating mosquito-free outdoor spaces using transfluthrin-treated chairs and ribbons

10.21203/rs.2.19697/v1 ◽

2019 ◽

Author(s):

John Paliga Masalu ◽

Marceline Finda ◽

Gerry F. Killeen ◽

Halfan S. Ngowo ◽

Polius G. Pinda ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Anopheles Funestus ◽

Indoor Residual Spraying ◽

Malaria Vectors ◽

Insecticide Treated Nets ◽

Domestic Spaces ◽

Host Seeking ◽

Outdoor Spaces ◽

Outdoor Biting ◽

Outdoor Environments ◽

Almost All

Abstract Background Residents of malaria-endemic communities spend several hours outdoors performing different activities, e.g. cooking, story-telling or eating, thereby exposing themselves to potentially-infectious mosquitoes. This compromises effectiveness of indoor interventions, notably long-lasting insecticide-treated nets (LLINs) and indoor residual spraying (IRS). This study characterized common peri-domestic spaces in rural south-eastern Tanzania, and assessed protective efficacies of hessian fabric mats and ribbons treated with the spatial repellent, transfluthrin and respectively fitted to chairs and outdoor kitchens, against mosquitoes.Methods Two hundred households were surveyed, and their most-used peri-domestic spaces physically characterized. Protective efficacies of locally-made transfluthrin-emanating chairs and hessian ribbons were tested in outdoor environments of eight households using volunteer-occupied exposure-free double net traps. CDC light traps were used to estimate host-seeking mosquito densities within open-structure outdoor kitchens. Field-collected Anopheles arabiensis and Anopheles funestus mosquitoes were exposed underneath the chairs to estimate 24h-mortality. Finally, WHO insecticide susceptibility tests were conducted on wild-caught Anopheles from the villages.Results Approximately half (52%) of houses had verandas. Aside from these verandas, most houses also had peri-domestic spaces where residents stayed most times (67% of houses with verandas and 94% of non-veranda houses). Two-thirds of these spaces were sited under trees, and only one third (34.4%) were built-up. The outdoor structures were usually makeshift kitchens having roofs and partial walls. Transfluthrin-treated chairs reduced outdoor-biting An. arabiensis densities by 70-76% while transfluthrin-treated hessian ribbons fitted to the outdoor kitchens caused 81% reduction in the general peri-domestic area. Almost all the field-collected An. arabiensis (99.4%) and An. funestus (100%) exposed under transfluthrin-treated chairs died. The An. arabiensis were susceptible to non-pyrethroids (pirimiphos methyl & bendiocarb) but resistant to pyrethroids commonly used on LLINs (deltamethrin & permethrin).Conclusion Most houses had actively-used peri-domestic outdoor spaces where exposure to mosquitoes occurred. The transfluthrin-treated chair and ribbons reduced outdoor-biting malaria vectors in these peri-domestic spaces, and also elicited significant mortality among pyrethroid-resistant field-caught malaria vectors. These two new prototype formats for transfluthrin emanators, if developed further, may constitute new options for complementing LLINs and IRS with outdoor protection against malaria and other mosquito-borne pathogens in areas where peri-domestic human activities are common.

Download Full-text

Heterogeneous exposure and hotspots for malaria vectors at three study sites in Uganda

Gates Open Research ◽

10.12688/gatesopenres.12838.2 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 2 ◽

pp. 32 ◽

Cited By ~ 8

Author(s):

Su Yun Kang ◽

Katherine E. Battle ◽

Harry S. Gibson ◽

Laura V. Cooper ◽

Kilama Maxwell ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Malaria Transmission ◽

Malaria Vector ◽

Malaria Control ◽

Negative Binomial ◽

Indoor Residual Spraying ◽

Housing Quality ◽

Environmental Covariates ◽

Vector Density ◽

Vector Abundance ◽

Study Sites

Background: Heterogeneity in malaria transmission has household, temporal, and spatial components. These factors are relevant for improving the efficiency of malaria control by targeting heterogeneity. To quantify variation, we analyzed mosquito counts from entomological surveillance conducted at three study sites in Uganda that varied in malaria transmission intensity. Mosquito biting or exposure is a risk factor for malaria transmission. Methods: Using a Bayesian zero-inflated negative binomial model, validated via a comprehensive simulation study, we quantified household differences in malaria vector density and examined its spatial distribution. We introduced a novel approach for identifying changes in vector abundance hotspots over time by computing the Getis-Ord statistic on ratios of household biting propensities for different scenarios. We also explored the association of household biting propensities with housing and environmental covariates. Results: In each site, there was evidence for hot and cold spots of vector abundance, and spatial patterns associated with urbanicity, elevation, or other environmental covariates. We found some differences in the hotspots in rainy vs. dry seasons or before vs. after the application of control interventions. Housing quality explained a portion of the variation among households in mosquito counts. Conclusion: This work provided an improved understanding of heterogeneity in malaria vector density at the three study sites in Uganda and offered a valuable opportunity for assessing whether interventions could be spatially targeted to be aimed at abundance hotspots which may increase malaria risk. Indoor residual spraying was shown to be a successful measure of vector control interventions in Tororo, Uganda. Cement walls, brick floors, closed eaves, screened airbricks, and tiled roofs were features of a house that had shown reduction of household biting propensity. Improvements in house quality should be recommended as a supplementary measure for malaria control reducing risk of infection.

Download Full-text

Efficacy of broflanilide (VECTRON™ T500), a new meta-diamide insecticide, for indoor residual spraying against pyrethroid-resistant malaria vectors

10.1101/2020.11.06.367961 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Corine Ngufor ◽

Renaud Govoetchan ◽

Augustin Fongnikin ◽

Estelle Vigninou ◽

Thomas Syme ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Vector Control ◽

Malaria Vector ◽

Indoor Residual Spraying ◽

Malaria Vectors ◽

Cross Resistance ◽

Malaria Vector Control ◽

Application Rates ◽

Wettable Powder ◽

Cone Bioassay ◽

Pirimiphos Methyl

AbstractThe rotational use of insecticides with different modes of action for indoor residual spraying (IRS) is recommended for improving malaria vector control and managing insecticide resistance. A more diversified portfolio of IRS insecticides is required; insecticides with new chemistries which can provide improved and prolonged control of insecticide-resistant vector populations are urgently needed. Broflanilide is a newly discovered insecticide being considered for malaria vector control. We investigated the efficacy of a wettable powder (WP) formulation of broflanilide (VECTRON™ T500) for IRS on mud and cement wall substrates in WHO laboratory and experimental hut studies against pyrethroid-resistant malaria vectors in Benin, in comparison with pirimiphos-methyl CS (Actellic® 300CS). There was no evidence of cross-resistance to pyrethroids and broflanilide in CDC bottle bioassays. In laboratory cone bioassays, mortality of susceptible and pyrethroid-resistant A. gambiae s.l. with broflanilide WP treated substrates was >80% for 6-14 months. At application rates of 100mg/m2 and 150 mg/m2, mortality of wild pyrethroid-resistant A. gambiae s.l. entering treated experimental huts in Covè, Benin was 57%-66% with broflanilide WP and did not differ significantly from pirimiphos-methyl CS (57-66% vs. 56%, P>0.05). Mosquito mortality did not differ between the two application rates and local wall substrate-types tested (P>0.05). Throughout the 6-month hut trial, monthly wall cone bioassay mortality on broflanilide WP treated hut walls remained >80% for both susceptible and resistant strains of A. gambiae s.l.. Broflanilide shows potential to significantly improve the control of malaria transmitted by pyrethroid-resistant mosquito vectors and would thus be a crucial addition to the current portfolio of IRS insecticides.One Sentence SummaryVECTRON™ T500, a new wettable powder formulation of broflanilide developed for indoor residual spraying, showed high and prolonged activity against wild pyrethroid-resistant malaria vectors, on local wall substrates, in laboratory bioassays and experimental household settings in Benin.

Download Full-text

Effectiveness of vector control methods for the control of cutaneous and visceral leishmaniasis: A meta-review

PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases ◽

10.1371/journal.pntd.0009309 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 15 (5) ◽

pp. e0009309

Author(s):

Carlos Alberto Montenegro Quiñonez ◽

Silvia Runge-Ranzinger ◽

Kazi Mizanur Rahman ◽

Olaf Horstick

Keyword(s):

Visceral Leishmaniasis ◽

Vector Control ◽

Systematic Reviews ◽

Indoor Residual Spraying ◽

World Health ◽

Control Methods ◽

Insecticide Treated Nets ◽

Meta Review ◽

Environmental Measures ◽

Meta Analyses

Elimination of visceral leishmaniasis (VL) in Southeast Asia and global control of cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) and VL are priorities of the World Health Organization (WHO). But is the existing evidence good enough for public health recommendations? This meta-review summarises the available and new evidence for vector control with the aims of establishing what is known about the value of vector control for the control of CL and VL, establishing gaps in knowledge, and particularly focusing on key recommendations for further scientific work. This meta-review follows the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) criteria, including (1) systematic reviews and meta-analyses (SRs/MAs) for (2) vector control methods and strategies and (3) for the control of CL and/or VL. Nine SRs/MAs were included, with different research questions and inclusion/exclusion criteria. The methods analysed for vector control can be broadly classified into (1) indoor residual spraying (IRS); (2) insecticide-treated nets (ITNs; including insecticide-impregnated bednets); (3) insecticide-treated curtains (ITCs; including insecticide-treated house screening); (4) insecticide-treated bedsheets (ITSs) and insecticide-treated fabrics (ITFs; including insecticide-treated clothing) and (5) durable wall lining (treated with insecticides) and other environmental measures to protect the house; (6) control of the reservoir host; and (7) strengthening vector control operations through health education. The existing SRs/MAs include a large variation of different primary studies, even for the same specific research sub-question. Also, the SRs/MAs are outdated, using available information until earlier than 2018 only. Assessing the quality of the SRs/MAs, there is a considerable degree of variation. It is therefore very difficult to summarise the results of the available SRs/MAs, with contradictory results for both vector indices and—if available—human transmission data. Conclusions of this meta-review are that (1) existing SRs/MAs and their results make policy recommendations for evidence-based vector control difficult; (2) further work is needed to establish efficacy and community effectiveness of key vector control methods with specific SRs and MAs (3) including vector and human transmission parameters; and (4) attempting to conclude with recommendations in different transmission scenarios.

Download Full-text

Effect of bendiocarb based (Ficam® 80% WP) Indoor Residual Spraying on feeding patterns from malaria vectors in Burkina Faso, West Africa.

10.21203/rs.3.rs-20419/v1 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Sawdetuo Aristide HIEN ◽

Dieudonné Diloma Soma ◽

Simon Pengwende Sawadogo ◽

Serge Bèwadéyir Poda ◽

Moussa Namountougou ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Burkina Faso ◽

Anopheles Gambiae ◽

Malaria Transmission ◽

Malaria Vector ◽

Indoor Residual Spraying ◽

Transmission Risk ◽

Malaria Vectors ◽

Anopheles Coluzzii ◽

Transmission Season ◽

Density Methods

Abstract Background The fight against vector is essential in malaria prevention strategies in several endemic countries in Africa. In Burkina Faso, malaria transmission is seasonal in most parts of country, so a single round of spraying should provide effective protection against malaria, provided the insecticide remains effective over the entire malaria transmission season. The outcomes of indoor residual spraying towards curtailing malaria transmission are firstly to decrease the life span of vector mosquitoes and also to reduce the malaria vectors density. Methods CDC light trap and early morning collections by pyrethrum spray catches were performed monthly to determine the change in malaria vector indices in sprayed (Diebougou) and unsprayed sites (Dano). The female’s malaria vectors collected by both methods were used to determine their blood feeding, biting and sporozoites rate and malaria transmission risk estimated by entomological inoculation rate. Results Anopheles gambiae complex composed to Anopheles gambiae, Anopheles coluzzii and Anopheles arabiensis were present throughout the transmission season, but An. gambiae was the predominant species collected (P =0.0005), comprising 88% of the total collected and the most infected species. Malaria vectors densities were significantly lower in sprayed villages (n=4,303) compared with unsprayed villages (n=12,569) during post-spraying period (P = 0.0012). In addition, mean human biting rate of An. gambiae sl and An . funestus ss were significantly lower in sprayed areas compared to unsprayed areas (P<0.05). Overall, malaria vector transmission risk was significant lower in villages which received IRS (P=0.0001) whatever the malaria vectors species ( An. gambiae sl and An. funestus ss). Conclusions The results showed that in the sprayed area (Diebougou), vector densities, human biting rates and malaria transmission risks were very lower than unsprayed areas (Dano). The findings also showed a change in vector behavior especially within An. funestus which became more zoophagic following IRS. The indoor residual spraying could be recommanded as control tool in areas where malaria transmission occured a given period of year.

Download Full-text

Species Diversity and Entomological Inoculation Rate of Anophelines Mosquitoes in an Epidemic Prone Areas of Bure District, Northwestern Ethiopia

10.21203/rs.3.rs-103609/v1 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Tilahun Adugna Wassie ◽

Delensaw Yewhelew Gebru ◽

Emana Emana Getu (Prof.) Degaga

Keyword(s):

Species Diversity ◽

Disease Transmission ◽

Entomological Inoculation Rate ◽

Indoor Residual Spraying ◽

Northwest Ethiopia ◽

Malaria Vectors ◽

Insecticide Treated Nets ◽

Source Reduction ◽

Sporozoite Rate ◽

Control And Prevention

Abstract Background: Malaria is the leading health problem in Ethiopia. The country has been prevented malaria vectors mostly using long-lasting insecticide-treated nets, the application of indoor residual spraying chemicals, and source reductions. Before interventions, identifying the responsible malaria vector in disease transmission (sporozoite rate) is very vital; hence, the present study was designed to assess species diversity and entomological inoculation rate of Anopheles mosquito in Bure district, Northwest Ethiopia. Methods: Adult mosquitoes were collected from July 2015 to June 2016 using the center for disease control and prevention light traps, pyrethrum spray catches, and artificial pit shelters. Mosquitoes were morphologically identified. Following this, An. gambiae s.l was identified molecularly. Head-thorax sporozoite infectivity of the adult female Anopheles mosquitoes was assessed using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. Results: Morphologically, nine species of the genus Anopheles were identified in the three villages, composed of Anopheles demeilloni, An. arabiensis, An. funestus, An. coustani, An. squamosus, An. cinereus, An. pharoensis, An. rupicolus, and An. natalensis. Of these species, An. demeilloni was the most predominant, whereas An. cinereus, An. rupicolus and An. natalensis were the least representative species (p < 0.0001). Greater number of adult Anopheles mosquitoes were collected in Shnebekuma, non-irrigated villages than non- irrigated village (Workmidr) and irrigated village (Bukta) (p < 0.0001). The overall Plasmodium infective rate (P. falciparum and P. vivax) in the district was 0.31%. The overall annual sporozoite rate in non-irrigated villages (Shnebekuma and Workmidr) was 0.35%, whereas zero in irrigated village (Bukta). The overall estimated EIR of Anopheles mosquitoes was 5.7 infectious bites /person /year for both P. falciparum and P. vivax in the district. The annual EIR Anopheles species in non-irrigated villages was 5.65 ib/p/y, which was higher than irrigated village (0 ib/p/y). Conclusions: Both the primary (An. arabiensis) and secondary (An. funestus and An. pharoensis) malaria vectors of Ethiopia were identified in the three villages. Three of Anopheles species, An. arabiensis, An. funestus, and An. coustani were found to be infected only in irrigated villages. Source reduction and proper usage of long-lasting insecticide nets and indoor residual spraying could be implemented in the non- irrigated villages to cut the vector abundance and EIR.

Download Full-text