scholarly journals Pharmacy Students’ Perception and Evaluation of Objective Structured Clinical Examination: Near East University Experience

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bilgen Basgut ◽  
Abdikarim Mohamed Abdi
Keyword(s):  
Formative Assessment ◽  
Clinical Examination ◽  
Clinical Skills ◽  
Student Assessment ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Opportunity To Learn ◽  
Role Playing ◽  
Pharmacy Students ◽  
Objective Structured Clinical Examination ◽  
Cross Sectional Survey

Background: Pharmacy educators have always been desirous of the best methods for formative and summative evaluation of trainees. The Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) is an approach for student assessment in which aspects of clinical competence are evaluated in a comprehensive, consistent, and structured manner. Though recently become popular in pharmacy schools globally, its use in North Cyprus and Turkey pharmacy schools appears limited. Objectives: To assess pharmacy students’ evaluation and overall perception of OSCE. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted on pharmacy students, who participated in the final OSCE examination in 2015-2016.The study sample consisted of fifth-year Pharmacy students who took the OSCE assessment during their studies. A24-item self-administered structured questionnaire was employed to obtain relevant data on OSCE evaluation in terms of content reliability and structure of the examination. Students’ responses were based on a 4-point Likert scales ranging from disagree to no comment. The data were analyzed using SPSS, version 22. Results: Of 81 eligible students, 74 completed self- administered questionnaire representing 91.35% response rate. A total of 68(90.7%) students agreed that wide knowledge area and clinical skills were covered in the exam. Over 80% of the students saw that OSCE besides it provided them with an opportunity to learn real life scenario, it was well administered and run in the faculty and better organized compared to a previous pilot OSCE (68%). Around 77% of the students saw that 7 minutes time allocated per station was adequate, while a close percentage also agreed that standardized patients were competent in their role playing. Majority of students though they identify that OSCEs highlighted areas of weakness in their skills and knowledge but still disagree with incorporating OSCEs marks into final marks and thus prefer it as an formative assessment. Conclusions: Students highly perceived the exam feeling that it is more resembles actual practice providing them with self-confidence, and more clearly their defects and what they need to improve regarding both skills and knowledge. They saw OSCEs as being a beneficial formative assessment that should not be included as marks into finals.

Impact of test anxiety on pharmacy students’ performance in Objective Structured Clinical Examination: a cross-sectional survey

2017 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 191-194 ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhammad A. Hadi ◽  
Majid Ali ◽  
Abdul Haseeb ◽  
Mahmoud M.A. Mohamed ◽  
Mahmoud E. Elrggal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Test Anxiety ◽  
Clinical Examination ◽  
Pharmacy Students ◽  
Objective Structured Clinical Examination ◽  
Cross Sectional Survey ◽  
Cross Sectional

Analisis Capaian Kompetensi Mahasiswa dalam Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) Semester Ganjil Tahun Ajaran 2017/2018 Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas HKBP Nommensen Medan

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 28-35
Author(s):  
Jenny Novina Sitepu
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Examination ◽  
Clinical Reasoning ◽  
Clinical Skills ◽  
Objective Structured Clinical Examination ◽  
Treatment Practice ◽  
Standard Patient ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Reasoning Skills ◽  
Clinical Reasoning Skills ◽  
Academic Year

Backgroud: Clinical skills is one of competency as a doctor. Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) is an ideal way to assess clinical skills for undergraduated, graduated, and postdraduated clinical students. The low score in some OSCE station can be an input for teaching and curriculum improvement. This study aim to analyzed student competency achievement in first term in 2017/2018 academic year in  Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas HKBP Nommensen. Methods: This study was qualitative study with descriptive design. The sample was OSCE score in first term in 2017/2018 academic year. Student achievement was the mean score of every student in all station in OSCE. Competency achievement was the mean of students score for every competency in OSCE. Next, the stations was categorized in practice/ procedure skills station and clinical reasoning skills station. Skills achievement was got form the mean of score (in percent) of procedure skills and clinical reasoning station. Indept interview with students and lectures was held to knowed their perception about OSCE. Results: Students’ achievement in OSCE of first term academic year 2017/2018 was 62.4% for 2015’s students, and 64.6% for 2016’ students. The lowest competency achievement of 2015’s students was diagnosis and differential diagnosis. For the 2016’s students, it was farmacology treatment. Practice/ procedure skills achievement in OSCE of first term academic year 2017/2018 was 61.34% (2015’s students) and 74.4% (2016’s students). The clinical reasoning skills achievement was 62.80% (2015’s students), and 58.77% (2016’s students). Based on indept interview, the things that make student’s achievement low were the clinical reasoning ability of students was still low, the standard patient that involved in OSCE didn’t acted properly, the students’ knowledge about medicine and prescription was poor, and there were lot of learning schedules and learning subjects that students must did and learned. Conclusions:  Students’ achievement in OSCE of first term academic year 2017/2018 is need to  be improved.

scholarly journals Objective structured clinical examination in physiotherapy teaching: a systematic review

2019 ◽  
Vol 32 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aline Moreira Ribeiro ◽  
Alcindo Antônio Ferla ◽  
Juleimar Soares Coelho de Amorim
Keyword(s):  
Latin American ◽  
Clinical Examination ◽  
Professional Competence ◽  
Teaching Method ◽  
Clinical Skills ◽  
Scientific Evidence ◽  
Health Sciences ◽  
Educational Process ◽  
Objective Structured Clinical Examination ◽  
Methodologic Quality

Abstract Introduction: Problems related to the clinical abilities of physiotherapy students are not always identified throughout the educational process and might only be observed when these future professionals have to treat patients. The Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) includes a problematization approach and can be used in Health Sciences teaching to help this identification before internship practices. However, there are few studies on its use in Physiotherapy. Objective: To gather evidence of the OSCE use to evaluate clinical abilities in Physiotherapy teaching. Method: Articles published from 2000 to 2016 were surveyed in the Biblioteca Virtual em Saúde (BVS) (Virtual Health Library), Centro Latino-Americano e do Caribe de Informação em Ciências da Saúde (BIREME) (Latin-American and Caribbean Health Sciences Information Center), PubMed, Scielo and Web of Science, using the descriptors “educational assessment”, “assessment methods”, “objective structured clinical examination”, “clinical competence”, “professional competence”, “clinical skills”, “student competence”, “student skills”, “physiotherapy” and the Booleans “OR” and “AND”. Results: The initial number of identified publications was 3,242. From these, seven were included in this review. Two studies were developed in Brazil, four in Australia and one in Canada. The studies were scored 7 to 12 regarding methodologic quality, and 1B and 2B regarding scientific evidence. Conclusion: Students’ clinical abilities were grouped into three classes: cognitive, psychomotor and affective, and four studies described their use. There is very little evidence of the use of OSCE, but the instrument can be applied to evaluate skills and competences in Physiotherapy teaching.

scholarly journals Team-Based Decision-Making in an Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE)

2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 14 ◽  
Author(s):  
Renee Dagenais ◽  
Shane A Pawluk ◽  
Daniel C Rainkie ◽  
Kyle Wilby
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Student Performance ◽  
Clinical Examination ◽  
Rank Order ◽  
Pharmacy Students ◽  
Competency Framework ◽  
Objective Structured Clinical Examination ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Reflective Journal ◽  
Students Attitudes

  Evaluation of pre-licensure students’ competency in team-based decision-making is lacking. The purposes of this study were to evaluate pre-licensure pharmacy students’ competency in team-based decision-making in the context of an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE), and to determine whether performance correlated with reflective assignment scores. Students’ self-assessment and conceptualization of team-based decision-making in practice was also evaluated. Twenty-three pre-licensure pharmacy students’ competency in team-based decision-making was evaluated in an OSCE station and with a reflective journal assignment; rubric scores for both evaluations were compared using Spearman’s rank order analysis. Students completed an 18-item questionnaire regarding attitudes, confidence, and perceptions related to team-based decision-making. Descriptive statistics and construct analysis with open coding were used to analyse questionnaire results. Mean OSCE station and reflective journal scores were 45% and 66.3%, respectively, and were not correlated. Students’ attitudes toward team-based decision-making were positive, and they reported performing associated behaviours during experiential education rotations. Students appropriately defined ‘team-based decision-making’ and were highly confident in performing related activities. However, students’ conceptualization of team-based decision-making did not align with the pharmacy program’s competency framework.  Three key themes were identified through the study analyses: 1) student performance is dependent on assessment context when evaluating collaborator-related competencies; 2) there is a mismatch between students’ perceived competency and objectively measured competence when collaborator outcomes were assessed within an OSCE; and 3) students’ perceptions of team-based decision-making do not align with the program’s competency framework. Future research is necessary to assess competency and perceptions of team-based decision-making in students from other healthcare professions, and to further evaluate whether pre-licensure students are “collaborative practice ready”.   Article Type: Case Study

scholarly journals Traditional Versus Objective Structured Clinical Examination on Pediatric Nursing Students’ Performance

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 11
Author(s):  
Khadiga M. Said ◽  
Safaa F. Draz
Keyword(s):  
Nursing Students ◽  
Clinical Examination ◽  
Clinical Skills ◽  
Objective Structured Clinical Examination ◽  
Simple Random Sample ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Pediatric Nursing ◽  
Clinical Scenarios ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Nursing Skills

Context: The Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) method is an effective tool for evaluating the clinical nursing skills of nursing students. OSCE is an assessment technique in which the student demonstrates their competence under a variety of simulated conditions Aim: This study aimed to compare objective structured clinical examinations versus traditional clinical examination on pediatric nursing students' performance. Methods: A quasi-experimental research design (study and control group) was used to conduct this study. The study was conducted in the laboratory of pediatric nursing skills at the faculty of nursing, Benha University. All male and female pediatric nursing students in the 3rd year (n. =228), who were studying in the academic year 2018-2019, first semester, faculty of nursing, Benha University, was recruited. A simple random sample chose to achieve the aim of this study. The odd number was for the OSCE group and the even number for the traditional clinical examination (TCE) group. Four tools were utilized to collect data for the current study. A Structured Questionnaire Sheet, A modified Self-administered Questionnaire, Pediatric Nursing Students' Practice Observational Checklists, and Clinical Scenarios were designed to assess the pediatric nursing student OSCE exam and compare between the traditional method and OSCE method of exams. Results: The current study discovered statistically significant differences were found with a high percentage of agreement responses among pediatric nursing students for related items of OSCE method compared to those in TCE. Additionally, the results clarify a highly statistically significant difference between the studied pediatric nursing students' in TCE and OSCE total performance scores. Conclusion: Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) was opinioned as a tool for clinical evaluation. This finding appeared in pediatric nursing students' responses, which confirmed their acceptance of OSCE. The OSCE subsequently remains a more objective method of assessment than the traditional clinical forms of the exam that was previously used. OSCE can be used most effectively in undergraduate nursing curricula to assess fair practice. This type of exam provided an accurate measure of clinical skill competencies. Therefore, OSCE should be adopted as a strategy for examining clinical skills for students in all academic years. The current study recommended that Objective Structured Clinical Examination can be used as effective and meaningful assistance to fitness for practice, and OSCE should be adopted as a strategy for examining clinical skills for students in all academic years.

The Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) as a Determinant of Veterinary Clinical Skills

2006 ◽  
Vol 33 (4) ◽  
pp. 578-587 ◽  
Author(s):  
Margery H. Davis ◽  
Gominda G. Ponnamperuma ◽  
Sean McAleer ◽  
Vicki H.M. Dale
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Examination ◽  
Clinical Skills ◽  
Objective Structured Clinical Examination
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document