Analisis Capaian Kompetensi Mahasiswa dalam Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) Semester Ganjil Tahun Ajaran 2017/2018 Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas HKBP Nommensen Medan

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 28-35
Author(s):  
Jenny Novina Sitepu
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Examination ◽  
Clinical Reasoning ◽  
Clinical Skills ◽  
Objective Structured Clinical Examination ◽  
Treatment Practice ◽  
Standard Patient ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Reasoning Skills ◽  
Clinical Reasoning Skills ◽  
Academic Year

Backgroud: Clinical skills is one of competency as a doctor. Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) is an ideal way to assess clinical skills for undergraduated, graduated, and postdraduated clinical students. The low score in some OSCE station can be an input for teaching and curriculum improvement. This study aim to analyzed student competency achievement in first term in 2017/2018 academic year in  Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas HKBP Nommensen. Methods: This study was qualitative study with descriptive design. The sample was OSCE score in first term in 2017/2018 academic year. Student achievement was the mean score of every student in all station in OSCE. Competency achievement was the mean of students score for every competency in OSCE. Next, the stations was categorized in practice/ procedure skills station and clinical reasoning skills station. Skills achievement was got form the mean of score (in percent) of procedure skills and clinical reasoning station. Indept interview with students and lectures was held to knowed their perception about OSCE. Results: Students’ achievement in OSCE of first term academic year 2017/2018 was 62.4% for 2015’s students, and 64.6% for 2016’ students. The lowest competency achievement of 2015’s students was diagnosis and differential diagnosis. For the 2016’s students, it was farmacology treatment. Practice/ procedure skills achievement in OSCE of first term academic year 2017/2018 was 61.34% (2015’s students) and 74.4% (2016’s students). The clinical reasoning skills achievement was 62.80% (2015’s students), and 58.77% (2016’s students). Based on indept interview, the things that make student’s achievement low were the clinical reasoning ability of students was still low, the standard patient that involved in OSCE didn’t acted properly, the students’ knowledge about medicine and prescription was poor, and there were lot of learning schedules and learning subjects that students must did and learned. Conclusions:  Students’ achievement in OSCE of first term academic year 2017/2018 is need to  be improved.

scholarly journals Examining validity and reliability of Objective Structured Clinical Examination for evaluation of clinical skills of midwifery undergraduate students: a descriptive study

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mitra Kolivand ◽  
Marzieh Esfandyari ◽  
Sousan Heydarpour
Keyword(s):  
Undergraduate Students ◽  
Clinical Examination ◽  
Clinical Evaluation ◽  
Clinical Course ◽  
Clinical Skills ◽  
Normal Pregnancy ◽  
Objective Structured Clinical Examination ◽  
Practical Skills ◽  
Validity And Reliability ◽  
The Mean

Abstract BACKGROUND: Clinical evaluation is one of the main pillars of medical education. The Objective Structured Clinical Examination is one of the commonly adopted practical tools to evaluate clinical and practical skills of medical students. Validity and reliability of the tool to evaluate clinical skills of midwifery undergraduate students in Kermanshah Midwifery Nursing School were examined. METHODS: Seven clinical skills were evaluated in this descriptive correlative study using a performance checklist. Thirty-two midwifery students performed the skills at seven stations each monitored by an observer using an evaluation checklist. Criterion-related validity was obtained through determining the correlation between the clinical courses point and the Objective Structured Clinical Evaluation score. The collected data was analyzed in SPSS (v.20) and logistic regression test. RESULTS: The correlation score of Objective Structured Clinical Examination was significantly related to the mean score of clinical course “Normal Pregnancy I” (0.319, p=0.075), the mean score of clinical course “Normal and Abnormal delivery I” (0.399, p=0.024), the mean score of clinical course “gynaecology “ (0.419, p=0.017) and total average scores(0.23, p=0.200). The correlation between the total score and mean score of students at the stations showed that out of the seven stations, the correlations of the stations three (communication and collecting medical history) and four (childbirth) were not significant. CONCLUSION: Although it appeared that Objective Structured Clinical Examination was one of the effective and efficient ways to evaluate clinical competencies and practical skills of students, the tool could not evaluate all the aspects.

scholarly journals Implementation of Objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) as a tool to evaluate the development of clinical reasoning in physical therapy students and level of satisfaction with its use

2021 ◽  
Vol 70 (2) ◽  
pp. e90746
Author(s):  
Nicole Figueroa-Arce ◽  
Paola Figueroa-González ◽  
Luis Gómez-Miranda ◽  
Ruvistay Gútierrez-Arias ◽  
Viviana Contreras-Pizarro
Keyword(s):  
Physical Therapy ◽  
Clinical Examination ◽  
Clinical Reasoning ◽  
Clinical Skills ◽  
Objective Structured Clinical Examination ◽  
Satisfaction Survey ◽  
Physical Therapy Students ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Level Of Satisfaction ◽  
Passing Score

Introduction: Clinical reasoning involves critical thinking and decision-making in clinical situations. It can be evaluated using Objective structured clinical examination (OSCE), which measures clinical skills associated with the development of clinical reasoning. Objective: To describe the implementation of an OSCE to evaluate the clinical skills associated with the development of clinical reasoning in physical therapy students, and to determine their level of satisfaction with this strategy. Materials and methods: Cross-sectional descriptive study carried out in 159 physiotherapy students from Universidad Andres Bello, Chile, enrolled in the Reasoning in Physical therapy course. The OSCE had 11 stations and a student satisfaction survey was administered. Data normality was determined using the Shapiro-Wilk test. Descriptive statistics (percentages, medians, and interquartile ranges (IQR)) were used for data analysis. Results: The median global score was 142 points (IQR:132-150) and 61.1% of the students obtained a passing score (≥ 134 points). Stations in which most students had a passing score were S3, S5 and S7 (with standardized patients): 78.62%, 96.85% and 85.53%, respectively. Regarding the satisfaction survey, 36.48% and 59.12% of the students agreed and strongly agreed with using tools that assess their clinical skills. Conclusions: The OSCE was successfully designed and implemented to evaluate the clinical skills associated with the the development of clinical reasoning in the study population, and most of them reported a high level of satisfaction with its use; this confirms OSCE is an excellent methodology to train and evaluate physical therapy students.

scholarly journals Effects of a Blood Transfusion Course Using a Blended Learning Approach on the Acquisition of Clinical Reasoning Skills among Nursing Students in Morocco

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (18) ◽  
pp. 260
Author(s):  
Rachid Gouifrane ◽  
Halima Lajane ◽  
Said Belaaouad ◽  
Said Benmokhtar ◽  
Said Lotfi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Nursing Education ◽  
Nursing Students ◽  
Blended Learning ◽  
Clinical Reasoning ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Post Test ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Reasoning Skills ◽  
Clinical Reasoning Skills ◽  
Experimental Group

learning clinical reasoning skills in nursing education is a challenge for teachers and students. This study investigated the effects of a blended learning program on the acquisition of clinical reasoning skills via a blood transfusion course. The study employed a two group randomised controlled design with an experimental group (group 1, 16 students) and a control group (group 2, 16 students) recruited from a population of second-year nursing students at the Mohamed VI University of Health Sciences in Casablanca, Morocco, during the 2018–2019 academic year. The experimental group received blended instruction, while the control group received traditional classroom instruction over four sessions. One month after the experiment, a post-test was conducted with both groups using 'key-feature questions' that included four clinical situations and 30 questions. The mean scores of the two groups were compared to assess the degree of acquisition of clinical reasoning skills. The mean post-test score was significantly higher in the experimental group than the control group (the p-value of the Mann-Whitney Test is less than 0.05). Moreover, a statistically significant correlation was detected between students' clinical reasoning scores and their theoretical examination marks. These results suggest that blended learning is useful for enhancing the clinical reasoning skills of nursing students, at least in the short term. Thus, it seems appropriate to develop more blended courses and integrate this approach into nursing education programs.

scholarly journals Examining validity and reliability of Objective Structured Clinical Examination for evaluation of clinical skills of midwifery undergraduate students: a descriptive study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mitra Kolivand ◽  
Marzieh Esfandyari ◽  
sousan Heydarpour
Keyword(s):  
Undergraduate Students ◽  
Clinical Examination ◽  
Clinical Evaluation ◽  
Clinical Course ◽  
Clinical Skills ◽  
Objective Structured Clinical Examination ◽  
Practical Skills ◽  
Test Results ◽  
Validity And Reliability ◽  
The Mean

Abstract BACKGROUND: Clinical evaluation is one of the main pillars of medical education. The Objective Structured Clinical Examination is one of the commonly adopted practical tools to evaluate clinical and practical skills of medical students. The purpose of the study is to determine validity and reliability of Objective Structured Clinical Examination for evaluation of clinical skills of midwifery undergraduate students. METHODS : Seven clinical skills were evaluated in this descriptive correlative study using a performance checklist. Census method was used for sampling. Thirty-two midwifery students performed the skills at seven stations each monitored by an observer using an evaluation checklist. Criterion validity was obtained through determining the correlation between the clinical and theoretical courses point and the Objective Structured Clinical Evaluation score. The collected data was analyzed in SPSS (v.20) and logistic regression test. RESULTS: The correlation score of Objective Structured Clinical Examination was significantly related to the mean score of clinical course “Normal and Abnormal delivery I” (0.399, p=0.024) and the mean score of clinical course “gynaecology “ (0.419, p=0.017). There was no significant correlation between OSCE scores and the mean score of theoretical courses (0.23, p=0. 200). The correlation between the total score and mean score of students at the stations showed that out of the seven stations, the correlations of the stations three (communication and collecting medical history) and four (childbirth) were not significant. CONCLUSION: Although, it appeared that Objective Structured Clinical Examination was one of the effective and efficient ways to evaluate clinical competencies and practical skills of students, the tool could not evaluate all the aspects.

The Use of a Modified Script Concordance Test in Clinical Rounds to Foster and Assess Clinical Reasoning Skills

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jordan D. Tayce ◽  
Ashley B. Saunders
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Reasoning ◽  
Assessment For Learning ◽  
Learning Activity ◽  
Free Text ◽  
Valuable Insight ◽  
Script Concordance Test ◽  
Concordance Test ◽  
Script Concordance ◽  
Reasoning Skills ◽  
Clinical Reasoning Skills

The development of clinical reasoning skills is a high priority during clinical service, but an unpredictable case load and limited time for formal instruction makes it challenging for faculty to foster and assess students’ individual clinical reasoning skills. We developed an assessment for learning activity that helps students build their clinical reasoning skills based on a modified version of the script concordance test (SCT). To modify the standard SCT, we simplified it by limiting students to a 3-point Likert scale instead of a 5-point scale and added a free-text box for students to provide justification for their answer. Students completed the modified SCT during clinical rounds to prompt a group discussion with the instructor. Student feedback was positive, and the instructor gained valuable insight into the students’ thought process. A modified SCT can be adopted as part of a multimodal approach to teaching on the clinic floor. The purpose of this article is to describe our modifications to the standard SCT and findings from implementation in a clinical rounds setting as a method of formative assessment for learning and developing clinical reasoning skills.

scholarly journals Objective structured clinical examination in physiotherapy teaching: a systematic review

2019 ◽  
Vol 32 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aline Moreira Ribeiro ◽  
Alcindo Antônio Ferla ◽  
Juleimar Soares Coelho de Amorim
Keyword(s):  
Latin American ◽  
Clinical Examination ◽  
Professional Competence ◽  
Teaching Method ◽  
Clinical Skills ◽  
Scientific Evidence ◽  
Health Sciences ◽  
Educational Process ◽  
Objective Structured Clinical Examination ◽  
Methodologic Quality

Abstract Introduction: Problems related to the clinical abilities of physiotherapy students are not always identified throughout the educational process and might only be observed when these future professionals have to treat patients. The Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) includes a problematization approach and can be used in Health Sciences teaching to help this identification before internship practices. However, there are few studies on its use in Physiotherapy. Objective: To gather evidence of the OSCE use to evaluate clinical abilities in Physiotherapy teaching. Method: Articles published from 2000 to 2016 were surveyed in the Biblioteca Virtual em Saúde (BVS) (Virtual Health Library), Centro Latino-Americano e do Caribe de Informação em Ciências da Saúde (BIREME) (Latin-American and Caribbean Health Sciences Information Center), PubMed, Scielo and Web of Science, using the descriptors “educational assessment”, “assessment methods”, “objective structured clinical examination”, “clinical competence”, “professional competence”, “clinical skills”, “student competence”, “student skills”, “physiotherapy” and the Booleans “OR” and “AND”. Results: The initial number of identified publications was 3,242. From these, seven were included in this review. Two studies were developed in Brazil, four in Australia and one in Canada. The studies were scored 7 to 12 regarding methodologic quality, and 1B and 2B regarding scientific evidence. Conclusion: Students’ clinical abilities were grouped into three classes: cognitive, psychomotor and affective, and four studies described their use. There is very little evidence of the use of OSCE, but the instrument can be applied to evaluate skills and competences in Physiotherapy teaching.

scholarly journals Traditional Versus Objective Structured Clinical Examination on Pediatric Nursing Students’ Performance

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 11
Author(s):  
Khadiga M. Said ◽  
Safaa F. Draz
Keyword(s):  
Nursing Students ◽  
Clinical Examination ◽  
Clinical Skills ◽  
Objective Structured Clinical Examination ◽  
Simple Random Sample ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Pediatric Nursing ◽  
Clinical Scenarios ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Nursing Skills

Context: The Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) method is an effective tool for evaluating the clinical nursing skills of nursing students. OSCE is an assessment technique in which the student demonstrates their competence under a variety of simulated conditions Aim: This study aimed to compare objective structured clinical examinations versus traditional clinical examination on pediatric nursing students' performance. Methods: A quasi-experimental research design (study and control group) was used to conduct this study. The study was conducted in the laboratory of pediatric nursing skills at the faculty of nursing, Benha University. All male and female pediatric nursing students in the 3rd year (n. =228), who were studying in the academic year 2018-2019, first semester, faculty of nursing, Benha University, was recruited. A simple random sample chose to achieve the aim of this study. The odd number was for the OSCE group and the even number for the traditional clinical examination (TCE) group. Four tools were utilized to collect data for the current study. A Structured Questionnaire Sheet, A modified Self-administered Questionnaire, Pediatric Nursing Students' Practice Observational Checklists, and Clinical Scenarios were designed to assess the pediatric nursing student OSCE exam and compare between the traditional method and OSCE method of exams. Results: The current study discovered statistically significant differences were found with a high percentage of agreement responses among pediatric nursing students for related items of OSCE method compared to those in TCE. Additionally, the results clarify a highly statistically significant difference between the studied pediatric nursing students' in TCE and OSCE total performance scores. Conclusion: Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) was opinioned as a tool for clinical evaluation. This finding appeared in pediatric nursing students' responses, which confirmed their acceptance of OSCE. The OSCE subsequently remains a more objective method of assessment than the traditional clinical forms of the exam that was previously used. OSCE can be used most effectively in undergraduate nursing curricula to assess fair practice. This type of exam provided an accurate measure of clinical skill competencies. Therefore, OSCE should be adopted as a strategy for examining clinical skills for students in all academic years. The current study recommended that Objective Structured Clinical Examination can be used as effective and meaningful assistance to fitness for practice, and OSCE should be adopted as a strategy for examining clinical skills for students in all academic years.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document