scholarly journals Joint Preservation Using Orthobiologic Therapies in Osteoarthritis

Author(s):  
Syed Asif Hasan ◽  
Salman Nawaf Almutairi ◽  
Lwai Abdullah Alhemaid ◽  
Ahmad Hassan Al Ghazwi ◽  
Badr Saad Alkhathaami ◽  
...  

Osteoarthritis is estimated to be the most prevalent musculoskeletal disorder in the world. Estimates show that the disease is prevalent in 18% and 10% in women and men that are aged >60 years old. The quality of life of the affected patients can also be significantly impacted due to the associated morbidities and functional loss. Many interventions have been proposed to preserve the joint and enhance the functional outcomes in patients with osteoarthritis. In the present literature review, we have discussed the different orthobiologic therapies for patients with osteoarthritis for joint preservation and subsequent improvement in the functional and pain outcomes. Variable modalities that have been proposed in the literature include Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate (BMAC), gene therapy and platelet rich plasma (PRP). All of these modalities were reported with favorable outcomes and minimal complications. PRP has been reported to have a clinical efficacy that is boosed when co-administered with hyaluronic acid. However, it should be noted that the clinical efficacy is limited in the long term, and administration is continuously required. On the other hand, gene therapy is a promising technique that offers maintained favorable outcomes with no adverse events. However, further studies are still needed to indicate the effectiveness and cost-efficacy of this approach.

2019 ◽  
Vol 48 (10) ◽  
pp. 2572-2585 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kai Huang ◽  
Grey Giddins ◽  
Li-dong Wu

Background: Platelet-rich plasma (PRP), as a promising alternative to traditional corticosteroid (CS), is now increasingly used in the treatment of elbow epicondylitis (EE) and plantar fasciitis (PF). To date, however, the synthesis of information on the clinical efficacy of PRP versus CS is limited with divergent conclusions. Purpose: To compare the clinical efficacy of PRP and CS injections in reducing pain and improving function in EE and PF. Study Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods: Online databases were searched from inception to October 2018 for prospective studies evaluating PRP versus CS injections for EE or PF. Independent reviewers undertook searches, screening, and risk-of-bias appraisals. The primary outcomes of interest were pain and function in both the short term (1-3 months) and the long term (≥6 months). Results: Twenty trials with 1268 participants were included. For EE, PRP provides a statistically and clinically meaningful long-term improvement in pain, with a very large effect size of −1.3 (95% CI, −1.9 to −0.7) when compared with CS, but the evidence level was low. For EE, there was moderate evidence that CS provides a statistically meaningful improvement in pain in the short term, with a medium effect size of 0.56 (95% CI, 0.08-1.03) as compared with PRP; this improvement might not be clinically significant. For PF, there was low evidence that PRP provides a statistically and clinically meaningful long-term improvement in function (American Orthopedic Foot & Ankle Society score), with a very large effect size of 1.94 (95% CI, 0.61-3.28). There were no significant differences between the groups in improvement in function in EE and pain and short-term function in PF, but the quality of the evidence was low. Conclusion: The use of PRP yields statistically and clinically better improvement in long-term pain than does CS in the treatment of EE. The use of PRP yields statistically and clinically better long-term functional improvement than that of CS in the treatment of PF.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yiqin Zhou ◽  
Haobo Li ◽  
Shiqi Cao ◽  
Yaguang Han ◽  
Jiahua Shao ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of intra-articular injection with pure platelet-rich plasma (P-PRP) versus those of leukocyte platelet-rich plasma (L-PRP) in treating knee cartilage lesions, we conducted a double-blind, randomized controlled clinical trial with a larger sample and longer follow-up period.Methods: From October 2019 to October 2020, 95 patients were invited to participate in our study, and 60 (63.2%) were randomized to P-PRP (n = 30) or L-PRP (n = 30) groups. Patients from the two groups were treated with knee intra-articular injections of P-PRP or L-PRP. Visual analog scale (VAS) and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) scores were assessed preoperatively and at 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months after intervention.Results: We followed up 27 cases in the P-PRP group and 26 cases in the L-PRP group. No significant differences in VAS and WOMAC scores were found between the two groups before the intervention (P>0.05). The WOMAC Pain and VAS-Motions scores of the P-PRP group were significantly lower than those of the L-PRP group at 6 weeks after the intervention (P<0.05). While the long-term clinical efficacy of both injections was similar and weakened after 12 months, more adverse events were found in the L-PRP group.Conclusions: The short-term results of our study are encouraging and demonstrate that both L-PRP and P-PRP intra-articular injections reduce pain and improve function in patients with knee cartilage lesions. Compared with the L-PRP injection, the P-PRP injection (which had a lower risk of early inflammation caused by leukocytes) showed better clinical efficacy in the early phase of postoperative rehabilitation and resulted in fewer adverse events. However, long-term clinical efficacy for both injections were similar and weakened after 12 months.Trial registration: ChiCTR1900026365. Registered on 3 October 2019, http://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.aspx?proj=43911.


BioTech ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 11
Author(s):  
Zinovia Tsitrouli ◽  
Maria-Anna Akritidou ◽  
Savvas Genitsaris ◽  
Gijsbert van Willigen

Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) is an autoimmune and inflammatory disease that affects the synovium (lining that surrounds the joints), causing the immune system to attack its own healthy tissues. Treatment options, to the current day, have serious limitations and merely offer short-term alleviation to the pain. Using a theoretical exercise based on literature, a new potentially viable therapy has been proposed. The new therapy focusses on a long-term treatment of RA based on gene therapy, which is only active when inflammation of the joint occurs. This treatment will prevent side effects of systemic application of drugs. Furthermore, the benefits of this treatment for the patient from a socio-economic perspective has been discussed, focusing on the quality of life of the patent and lower costs for the society.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Himanshu Bansal ◽  
Jerry Leon ◽  
Jeremy L. Pont ◽  
David A. Wilson ◽  
Anupama Bansal ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 26-28
Author(s):  
Amit Nathwani

Abstract AAV-mediated gene therapy has the potential to be paradigm shifting as a treatment for haemophilia. A single administration of AAV vector can result in safe and consistent long-term expression of transgene (>5 years), reduction in spontaneous bleeding episodes, reduction in clotting factor usage and an improvement in quality of life. There is huge commercial interest in this approach, with the expectation that an AAV gene therapy product for haemophilia B will be licensed by 2020.


Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 3061-3061
Author(s):  
Maria Teresa Lupo-Stanghellini ◽  
Giacomo Oliveira ◽  
Raffaella Greco ◽  
Luca Vago ◽  
Attilio Bondanza ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 3061 Background and methods. Suicide gene therapy (SGT) applied to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) has been one of the first clinical applications of gene therapy. In allo-HSCT the antileukemic potential mediated by alloreactive lymphocytes towards patient-specific antigens, such as minor and major histocompatibility antigens, is counterbalanced by the Graft-versus-Host-Disease (GvHD). The risk of GvHD increases with the level of HLA disparity between host and donor, and leads to impaired quality of life and reduced survival, particularly in patients (pts) transplanted from HLA-mismatched donors. In this contest SGT has been applied to modulate alloreactivity, by inserting the HSV-tk gene in donor lymphocytes. This suicide gene/prodrug system requires cell cycle for optimal killing. In the context of allo-HSCT, this characteristic ensures a further level of specificity in GvHD control, by allowing to selectively kill highly proliferating alloreactive cells during GvHD, while sparing resting T cells. We assessed long-term safety in TK cells treated pts. Results. Overall 128 pts have been treated worldwide in 10 phase I-II clinical trials with donor lymphocytes expressing the HSV-tk suicide gene, with the purpose of enforcing the graft-versus-tumor (GvT) effect and/or promoting a functional post-transplant immune reconstitution (IR) while allowing control of GvHD. This approach proved highly feasible, safe and effective in promoting a dynamic and patient-specific modulation of alloreactivity. TK cells engrafted in the majority of pts and a clinical benefit, measured as improvement of hematopoietic chimerism, malignant regression and/or IR, was reported for 65 pts (51%). GvHD grade II-IV was observed in 28 pts (22%) and was always rapidly and completely controlled by the activation of suicide machinery. A selected population of 57 pts, treated at San Raffaele Institution, was studied in more detail for long-term analysis: 23 pts received cells to treat relapse occurring after an HLA-identical allo-HSCT (Ciceri F et al, Blood. 2007: 109; 4698–470) and 34 pts to improve IR after haploidentical HSCT (Bonini C et al, Blood. 2002; 100: 115a; Ciceri F, Bonini C et al, Lancet Oncology. 2009; 10: 489–500). No adverse event correlated to the gene transfer procedure was ever reported. Genetically modified cells engrafted in 90% of treated pts and could be detected in vivo, at low frequencies for up to 14 years (y). In the HLA-identical setting 11 pts obtained clinical response of the malignant disease and 3/11 are alive with a median follow-up of 15y. Two pts are in complete remission (CR), while one pt affected by chronic myelomonocytic leukemia relapsed 15y post transplant. This pt was subsequently treated with a second transplant from an unrelated match donor and is now in CR 1 year after transplant. In the haploidentical setting, 25 pts/34 reached the target of IR and 9 are alive and in CR with a median follow-up of 7y. Four out of 9 experienced GVHD in the early phase post IR, none presented signs, symptoms, complications related to GvHD and none needed pharmacological treatment in long-term. According to international guideline for long-term follow-up (Majhail NS et al, BBMT. 2012; 18: 348–371) all pts underwent regular screening and clinical evaluation. No major infections occurred in the late phase, no ocular, oral, respiratory, hepatic, renal, genitourinary, muscle-skeletal or neurological distress. Noteworthy 3 pts developed second cancer (2 skin cancer non-melanoma, 1 endometrial cancer), 2 pt hypothyroidism, 1 pt coronary artery disease and 3 pts metabolic syndrome. No evidence of psychosocial symptoms was reported. Immunity against the transgene was reported in pts who received TK cells late after an HLA-identical allo-SCT. The quality of IR at the time of TK cells administration was the most predictive variable. On the contrary, no immunity against HSV-tk was ever detected in pts who received TK cells after transplantation of haploidentical CD34-selected cells, indicating that the infusion of TK cells to highly immunosuppressed pts is not limited by the development of transgene-specific immune responses. Conclusions. Long-term assessment confirmed the overall high benefit/risk ratio of the TK-cell approach in allo-HSCT. A phase III multicentric, randomized clinical trial sponsored by MolMed, is currently undergoing in the context of haploidentical HSCT. Disclosures: Bordignon: MolMed SpA: Employment. Bonini:MolMed S.p.A.: Consultancy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document