scholarly journals Effect of Muscle Energy Technique in Patient with Chronic Neck Pain- A Case Report

2021 ◽  
pp. 124-129
Author(s):  
Deepak Jain ◽  
Deepali Patil ◽  
Pratik Phansopkar
Keyword(s):  
Case Report ◽  
Cervical Spine ◽  
Neck Pain ◽  
Range Of Motion ◽  
Chronic Neck Pain ◽  
Muscle Energy Technique ◽  
Relieve Pain ◽  
Severe Impairment ◽  
Long Time ◽  
Muscle Energy

Introduction: Chronic neck pain might lead to a change in muscle tissue fibres. Neck discomfort is a serious and prevalent sickness. It is common in the general population, and it frequently results in severe impairment. These alterations have an impact on the cervical spine's capacity to govern 3-D movement efficiently. A range of manual therapy approaches are available to assist relieve pain and impairment while also cervical spine range of motion enhancement and everyday mobility. More evidence for Muscle Energy Technique (MET) in treating such a condition was found. This case report describes muscular energy technique's effect on a patient who has been suffering from neck pain for a long time. Case Presentation: At the previous three months, a 27-year-old female accountant in a hospital with extended periods of sitting while working on a computer presented to our facility with neck pain. Increase in pain with looking up. Discussion: The therapy was well embraced through this patient to muscle energy technique resulting in a high degree of flexibility in the cervical spine, reduce pain and improves flexibility and strength. Conclusion: Physiotherapy has a significant effect Pain, strength, and range of motion are all factors to consider. The findings of this case study indicate that a specific muscle energy technique It's possible that a routine will help to alleviate the problem of neck pain, improves strength and functional ability.

scholarly journals Muscle Energy Technique in the Rehabilitative Treatment for Acute and Chronic Non-Specific Neck Pain: A Systematic Review

Healthcare ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (6) ◽  
pp. 746
Author(s):  
Silvia Sbardella ◽  
Chiara La Russa ◽  
Andrea Bernetti ◽  
Massimiliano Mangone ◽  
Andrea Guarnera ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Neck Pain ◽  
Range Of Motion ◽  
Chronic Neck Pain ◽  
Clinical Effects ◽  
Rehabilitative Treatment ◽  
Cervical Range Of Motion ◽  
Physiotherapy Practice ◽  
Muscle Energy Technique ◽  
Muscle Energy ◽  
Acute Neck Pain

Background: Non-specific neck pain (NNP) affects 30–50% of the general population, and it often leads to severe disability. Several manual therapy techniques are available to reduce pain and disability and to improve cervical range of motion and functional activities. Muscle Energy Technique (MET) showed more evidence for treating such a disorder. The aim of this current scientific literature analysis was to compare the clinical effects of MET with the other manual or rehabilitative treatments for non-specific acute and chronic neck pain. Methods: The literature search was conducted using the following databases: PubMed, Medline, PEDro, Cochrane Database, and Google Scholar from 2010 to January 2020. Clinical trials about MET were included. The quality of the trials was assessed according to the PEDro scale. Results: Twenty-one papers according to inclusion and exclusion criteria were selected: 15 studies about non-specific acute neck pain and 6 studies about non-specific chronic neck pain. Conclusions: This analysis suggests that the MET approach has a good clinical effect on reducing neck pain in patients with acute neck pain and improves cervical range of motion in patients with chronic neck pain, and is better if combined with a traditional rehabilitative approach. This review’s findings should be considered with caution for physiotherapy practice because of the studies’ methodologic limitations. On the basis of the current available and limited evidence, clinicians could combine MET with traditional physiotherapy and other manual techniques when treating people with non-specific neck pain.

scholarly journals Effects of Muscle Energy Technique in Patients with Tension Type Headache; A Randomized Control Clnicial Trial

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rabia Sohail ◽  
Huma Riaz ◽  
Muhammad Akhtar ◽  
Asim Raza ◽  
Kinza Shabbir ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Spine ◽  
Range Of Motion ◽  
Tension Type Headache ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Muscle Energy Technique ◽  
Randomized Control ◽  
Muscle Energy ◽  
Type Headache ◽  
And Control ◽  
Experimental Group

Abstract Background: Tension type headache is claimed to be one of top ten disabling conditions in the world. The purpose of the study was to determine the effects of muscle energy technique on pain, range of motion at cervical spine and disability related to tension type headache. Methods: A randomized control trial was conducted on 48 participants of both genders whose age was 18 to 40 years with complain of tension type at Rehabilitation and Injury Management Department of Medcare International Hospital Gujranwala, from July to December 2019. Participants were randomly selected and allocated into two groups (experimental and control group). The experimental group received both muscle energy technique and myofascial release technique on trapezius and sternocleidomastoid of both sides. The intervention was applied for 6 weeks (3 sessions per week). Assessments were done at baseline, 4th week and 6th week. Numeric pain rating scale (NPRS), Headache disability inventory (HDI), headache impact test (HIT) and cervical range of motion with the help of Inclinometer were tools for assessment. Data analysis was done using SPSS (version 21). Results: The mean age of experimental group was 26.5±5.42 and control group was 27.7±5.70. The experimental group was shown significant improvement in terms of pain and flexion and side flexion range of motion with p-value ≤0.05. Conclusion: It is concluded that muscle energy technique is effective treatment for tension type headache; it is associated to decreased range of motion at cervical spine and disability related to TTH. Trial registration: IRCT20190121042445N2, Registered 07-02-2021.

scholarly journals Effect of muscle energy technique Versus Motor control Exercise adjunct to conventional therapy on Pain, Range of motion and functional disability in patient with chronic neck pain

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Deepak Jain ◽  
Deepali Patil ◽  
Pratik Phansopkar
Keyword(s):  
Motor Control ◽  
Neck Pain ◽  
Conventional Therapy ◽  
Functional Disability ◽  
Chronic Neck Pain ◽  
Long Term Effects ◽  
Muscle Energy Technique ◽  
Muscle Energy ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Control Exercise

Abstract Background: - Neck pain is defined as mechanical, neuropathic or secondary to any other disorder and it can be acute, 6 weeks; sub acute, 3 months; chronic, >3 months. types of potential causes for neck pain: medical effects, severe or non-threatening causes, usual and rare conditions, and genuine and invalid causes. Motor control was defined as motor relearning program with emphasis on coordination and holding capabilities of specific neck flexor, extensor, and shoulder girdle muscles. MET is a method of treatment that involves the voluntary contraction of a Patients muscle in a precisely controlled direction, against a counterforce provided by the therapist.Methodology: - In the study 50 chronic neck pain patients will be enrolled. And will be divided into 25 in each group. One group will receive Muscle Energy Technique and the other group will receive Motor Control Exercise as well as conventional therapy for 4 weeks. Pain, ROM and strength will be evaluated using the standard technique. Discussion: - The goal of this Interventional study is to examine the impact of MET versus MCE with conventional therapy on patients with chronic neck pain. This research will help in identifying rapid and long term effects of MET versus MCE with conventional therapy on patients with chronic neck pain. The clinical trial registry-India(CTRI) registration number for this trial is CTRI/2021/05/033497.

Range of motion in the upper and lower cervical spine in people with chronic neck pain

2012 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 53-59 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Rudolfsson ◽  
Martin Björklund ◽  
Mats Djupsjöbacka
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Spine ◽  
Neck Pain ◽  
Range Of Motion ◽  
Chronic Neck Pain ◽  
Lower Cervical Spine

scholarly journals Effectiveness of Muscle Energy Technique with and without Strain Counter Strain Technique in Individuals with Non-Specific Neck Pain - A Pilot Study from Aurangabad, India

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (31) ◽  
pp. 2470-2475
Author(s):  
Karishma Anurag Kapur ◽  
Sunil Gopal Rao Harsulkar
Keyword(s):  
Neck Pain ◽  
Range Of Motion ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Neck Disability Index ◽  
Cervical Range Of Motion ◽  
Muscle Energy Technique ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group A ◽  
Muscle Energy ◽  
Neck Disability

BACKGROUND Evidence till date indicates high incidence of neck pain, and soft tissue techniques [muscle energy technique (MET), strain counter strain (SCS)] have proven to be effective for non-specific neck pain (NSNP). However, their comparative effect is yet to be proven, hence the present study attempted to investigate the comparative effectiveness of MET with SCS techniques in individuals with NSNP. METHODS Total 10 participants diagnosed with NSNP were included in the study. They were allocated into two groups utilizing convenient sampling. Group A received MET with SCS technique and Group B received MET with conventional physiotherapy. The interventions were given for 2 weeks, 3 sessions per week for 45 minutes. The outcome measures used in the study were numeric pain rating scale (NPRS), neck disability index (NDI), range of motion (ROM) which were assessed before the intervention immediately after the first session and at 1st week and end of 2nd week. RESULTS Intragroup comparison found to be significantly reduced in terms of pain and neck disability index and improvement in cervical range of motion (P = < 0.05). However intergroup comparisons showed significant difference in Group A only at the end of 2nd week of intervention (P = < 0.05), but the results were not significant immediately and at the 1st week of intervention (P = > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS The study concluded that MET with SCS technique is more effective in reducing pain, neck disability and improving cervical range of motion. KEY WORDS MET, SCS, NSNP

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document