Minimizing negative outcomes associated with potentially harmful lithium levels by means of pharmacist-led educational interventions in an inpatient psychiatric facility

2015 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 29-34 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erika E. Tillery

Introduction: Studies examining educational interventions led by pharmacists to minimize negative outcomes associated with elevated and potentially harmful lithium levels in inpatient psychiatric facilities are lacking. Other studies indicate a need for improvement of therapeutic drug monitoring for lithium. The aim of this article is to identify potential improvements in negative outcomes associated with harmful lithium blood levels after educational interventions are delivered by a clinical pharmacist to providers of an inpatient psychiatric facility. Methods: Medication reports were queried from the pharmacy database to identify all patients who were taking lithium within 1 year. Laboratory results, physician progress notes, nursing progress notes, and treatment plans were studied to detect any adverse events associated with lithium levels. Educational interventions created by pharmacy services were tailored toward medical staff and delivered over a 3 month period. Learning was assessed at pre-educational and posteducational interventions. Results: One hundred fifteen patients received lithium between March 2012 and March 2013. The most-frequent adverse effects reported associated with lithium included tremor, dizziness, slurred speech, and lethargy. Two patients were sent to the local emergency department for lithium toxicity and required dialysis. Fifty-two patients received lithium after educational interventions, and no adverse events were reported. A lithium drug-monitoring spreadsheet was created for pharmacy use, and drug-monitoring guidelines were revised and disseminated throughout the facility. Discussion: A reduction in negative outcomes associated with lithium was noted after educational interventions to medical staff occurred. The impact of pharmacist-led educational interventions demonstrated a high potential for success.

Author(s):  
Paul Firman ◽  
Karen Whitfield ◽  
Ken‐Soon Tan ◽  
Alexandra Clavarino ◽  
Karen Hay

1998 ◽  
Vol 44 (5) ◽  
pp. 1096-1109 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roland Valdes ◽  
Saeed A Jortani ◽  
Mihai Gheorghiade

Abstract In this Standard of Laboratory Practice we recommend guidelines for therapeutic monitoring of cardiac drugs. Cardiac drugs are primarily used for treatment of angina, arrhythmias, and congestive heart failure. Digoxin, used in congestive heart failure, is widely prescribed and therapeutically monitored. Monitoring and use of antiarrhythmics such as disopyramide and lidocaine have been steadily declining. Immunoassay techniques are currently the most popular methods for measuring cardiac drugs. Several reasons make measurement of cardiac drugs in serum important: their narrow therapeutic index, similarity in clinical complications and presentation of under- and overmedicated patients, need for dosage adjustments, and confirmation of patient compliance. Monitoring may also be necessary in other circumstances, such as assessment of acetylator phenotypes. We present recommendations for measuring digoxin, quinidine, procainamide (and N-acetylprocainamide), lidocaine, and flecainide. We discuss guidelines for measuring unbound digoxin in the presence of an antidote (Fab fragments), for characterizing the impact of digoxin-like immunoreactive factor (DLIF) and other cross-reactants on immunoassays, and for monitoring the unbound (free fraction) of drugs that bind to α1-acid glycoprotein. We also discuss logistic, clinical, hospital, and laboratory practice guidelines needed for implementation of a successful therapeutic drug monitoring service for cardiac drugs.


2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Taylor A. Nichols ◽  
Sophie Robert ◽  
David J. Taber ◽  
Jeffrey Cluver

Abstract Introduction Limited evidence exists evaluating the impact of gabapentin in conjunction with benzodiazepines for the management of alcohol withdrawal. A review of outcomes associated with combination gabapentin and benzodiazepine therapy may illuminate new therapeutic uses in clinical practice. Methods This retrospective study evaluated the impact of gabapentin on as-needed use of benzodiazepines in inpatients being treated for acute alcohol withdrawal. The treatment cohort consisted of patients prescribed gabapentin while on a symptom-triggered alcohol withdrawal protocol. The control cohort consisted of patients on symptom-triggered alcohol withdrawal protocol without concurrent gabapentin use. Secondary objectives included length of hospital stay, duration on alcohol withdrawal protocol, frequency of complicated withdrawal, and use of additionally prescribed as-needed or scheduled benzodiazepines. Results The gabapentin cohort was on the alcohol withdrawal protocol for a similar duration, compared with the control cohort (median of 4 [interquartile range: 2,6] days vs 3 [2,4] days, P = .09, respectively). Similarly, the gabapentin cohort required a median of 1 [1,2] benzodiazepine dose for alcohol withdrawal symptoms compared with a median of 1 [1,2] dose in the control cohort, P = .89. No significant difference was found between cohorts for as-needed and scheduled benzodiazepine use. Length of stay in hospital was similar between groups. Discussion These results suggest that gabapentin use, in conjunction with benzodiazepines, impacts neither the time on alcohol withdrawal protocol or the number of benzodiazepine doses required for withdrawal. Larger, prospective studies are needed to detect if gabapentin alters benzodiazepine usage and to better elucidate gabapentin's role in acute alcohol withdrawal.


Diagnosis ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
Author(s):  
Adrian Klak ◽  
Steven Pauwels ◽  
Pieter Vermeersch

Abstract Background Dried blood spots (DBSs) could allow patients to prepare their own samples at home and send them to the laboratory for therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of immunosuppressants. The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of the current knowledge about the impact of DBS-related preanalytical factors on TDM of tacrolimus, sirolimus and everolimus. Content Blood spot volume, blood spot inhomogeneity, stability of analytes in DBS and hematocrit (Hct) effects are considered important DBS-related preanalytical factors. In addition, the influence of drying time has recently been identified as a noteworthy preanalytical factor. Tacrolimus is not significantly influenced by these factors. Sirolimus and everolimus are more prone to heat degradation and exhibited variations in recovery which were dependent on Hct and drying time. Summary and outlook DBS-related preanalytical factors can have a significant impact on TDM for immunosuppressants. Tacrolimus is not significantly influenced by the studied preanalytical factors and is a viable candidate for DBS sampling. For sirolimus and everolimus more validation of preanalytical factors is needed. In particular, drying conditions need to be examined further, as current protocols may mask Hct-dependent effects on recovery. Further validation is also necessary for home-based self-sampling of immunosuppressants as the sampling quality is variable.


2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S636-S636
Author(s):  
Anooj Shah ◽  
Carly D’Agostino ◽  
Kathleen Cunningham ◽  
Clare Kane ◽  
Michael G Ison ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The utility and clinical impact of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of prophylactic azole antifungals in lung transplant recipients is not well described. The objective of this study was to investigate the impact of TDM of azole prophylaxis in lung transplant recipients on the development of positive fungal events. Methods A retrospective analysis was performed on 47 lung transplant recipients between 2013 and 2018 at Northwestern Memorial Hospital. A positive fungal event was defined as fungal species on BAL culture and/or positive BAL Aspergillus galactomannan (GM) with an index value ≥1.0. Study groups were defined based on attainment of therapeutic trough levels after initiation of oral therapy (therapeutic if posaconazole level ≥0.7 μg/mL or voriconazole ≥1–5.5 μg/mL, subtherapeutic if ≥2 consecutive levels of posaconazole <0.7 μg/mL or voriconazole <1 μg/mL after initial dose increase). Results There were no differences in baseline characteristics (Figure 1). There were a total of 11 fungal events with 3 (12.0%) occurring in the therapeutic cohort and 8 (36.4%) in those subtherapeutic (P = 0.08). In the 5 patients with a positive GM, the mean index was 2.02 ± 0.95. 7/30 (23.3%) of patients on posaconazole had a fungal event, with 2/7 (28.6%) requiring treatment at the time of event. For patients on voriconazole, 4/17 (23.5%) had a fungal event, with 1/4 (25.0%) requiring treatment. Mean time to fungal event was 164.5 ± 8.9 days vs. 135.9 ± 13.7 days in the therapeutic and subtherapeutic group, respectively (P = 0.05). All patients on posaconazole suspension who experienced a fungal event were subtherapeutic (3/3, 100%) compared with the majority of patients on posaconazole delayed release (DR) tablets who achieved therapeutic levels (17/22, 77.3%). Mean posaconazole trough level observed in the patients receiving DR tablet was 2.15 ± 0.95 μg/mL. Conclusion There was an association between two consecutive subtherapeutic azole prophylaxis levels and positive fungal events indicating a role for TDM in lung transplant recipients. Time to fungal event post-transplant was shorter in subtherapeutic patients. As anticipated, the use of posaconazole suspension resulted in subtherapeutic levels. This study presents an opportunity for further research of the impact of TDM on clinical outcomes to optimize patient care. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.


2005 ◽  
Vol 39 (11) ◽  
pp. 1928-1931 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven C Stoner ◽  
Jessica W Lea ◽  
Angel L Wolf ◽  
Arnaldo A Berges

OBJECTIVE To report the case of a patient who experienced adverse events in succession to antiepileptic medications being used for both antiepileptic and mood-stabilization benefit. CASE SUMMARY A 46-year-old white woman developed hyponatremia with carbamazepine, hyperammonemia with divalproex, cognitive impairment with topiramate, and hyponatremia with oxcarbazepine. The patient was stabilized physically and psychiatrically on levetiracetam without any noted adverse events. DISCUSSION The adverse events in this report have been associated with the medications in question. The patient's presentation is unique, as she developed adverse events in succession to antiepileptic drugs being used to treat both a seizure disorder and symptoms of mood instability. The Naranjo rankings for the reported adverse events indicated the associations were probable (carbamazepine, divalproex, oxcarbazepine) and possible (topiramate). After repeated incidences of intolerability to these drugs, levetiracetam was initiated and provided both seizure control and mood-stabilizing benefits, which eventually led to hospital discharge. CONCLUSIONS Levetiracetam may provide mood-stabilizing qualities through a mechanism that is unique from that of other antiepileptic agents used for their mood-stabilizing properties. There are potential advantages with levetiracetam, as no specific therapeutic drug monitoring parameters need to be followed after its introduction. Additionally, this case emphasizes the importance of therapeutic drug monitoring and frequent assessments to prevent physical and psychiatric adverse reactions.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document