synchronous cancer
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

39
(FIVE YEARS 9)

H-INDEX

10
(FIVE YEARS 1)

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 115
Author(s):  
Eun-Jung Yang ◽  
Ji-Hyeon Lee ◽  
A-Jin Lee ◽  
Nae-Ry Kim ◽  
Yong-Taek Ouh ◽  
...  

Objective: To investigate the prevalence and oncologic outcomes of patients with multiple primary malignant tumors (MPMT) with gynecologic cancer. Methods: This retrospective study included 1929 patients diagnosed with gynecologic cancer at a tertiary medical center between August 2005 and April 2021. The clinical data included cancer location, age at primary malignancy diagnosis, interval between primary and secondary cancer, stage of cancer, family history of cancer, genetic testing, dates of last follow-up, recurrence, and death. Results: The prevalence of MPMT with gynecologic cancer in patients was 8.6% and the mean diagnostic period between primary and secondary cancer was 60 months. Furthermore, 20 of the 165 patients with MPMT had multiple primary gynecologic cancers (MPGC), whereas 145 had gynecologic cancer coexisting with non-gynecologic cancer (GNC). Endometrial-ovarian cancer (60%) was the most common coexisting cancer in the MPGC group, whereas the most common non-gynecologic cancer in the GNC group was breast cancer (34.5%). There were 48 patients with synchronous cancer and 117 patients with metachronous cancer. The incidence of synchronous cancer was higher in the MPGC group than in the GNC group (p = 0.037). Significantly more patients had early-stage ovarian cancer in the MPGC group than in the GNC group (p = 0.031). The overall recurrence and mortality rates were 15.8% and 8.5%, respectively, in patients with MPMT. Conclusion: Synchronous cancer incidence was significantly higher in the MPGC than in the GNC group. Early-stage ovarian cancer was more highly diagnosed in patients with MPGC than in those with GNC. A systematic examination after primary cancer diagnosis could facilitate the early diagnosis of secondary primary malignancy, thereby improving patient prognosis.


2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Mania Kave ◽  
Kambiz Sadegi ◽  
Fateme Parooie ◽  
Morteza Salarzaei

Introduction. The aim of this paper is to compare the diagnostic accuracy of PET/CT, PET/MRI, and the combination of PET/CT and MRI for detecting synchronous cancer and distant metastasis in patients with oropharyngeal and hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas (OHSCC). Method. A large and growing body of literature has been conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews (PRISMA). The researchers collected all accessible literature existing through Cochrane Library (John Wiley & Sons) electronic databases, Embase (Elsevier), PubMed (U.S. National Library of Medicine), Scopus, and Google Scholar up to June 2020. Analyses were conducted using Stata version 12.0 (StataCorp LP). Results. A total of nine studies consisting of 1166 patients were included. The pooled sensitivity of combined PET/CT with MRI, 18F-FDG PET/MRI, and 18F-FDG PET/CT was 0.92, 0.80, and 0.79, respectively, and the corresponding specificities were 0.93, 0.91, and 0.88. The overall prevalence of distant metastases and synchronous cancer in patients with oropharyngeal and hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas was 9.2% and 11.8%, respectively, with the esophagus (4.6%) being the most common site of synchronous cancer. The most common sites of distant metastases were lung (3%), bone (1.2%), and distant lymph nodes (1.2%), respectively. Conclusion. Our study showed an approximately similar diagnostic performance for PET/CT, PET/MRI, and the combination of PET/CT and MRI for metastasis assessment in advanced oropharyngeal and hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas.


2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 125-127
Author(s):  
I.A. Soloviev ◽  
A.B. Lychev ◽  
B.B. Bromberg ◽  
O.A. Litvinov ◽  
V.M. Serko ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (40) ◽  
pp. 62-67
Author(s):  
E.A. GALLIAMOV ◽  
◽  
M.A. AGAPOV ◽  
V.A. KUBISKIN ◽  
R.G. BIKTIMIROV ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Álvarez José Antonio Pérez ◽  
Gonzàlez Beatriz Contreras ◽  
López-Fé Alfonso Ángel Quesada ◽  
Peña Dàcil Judit Preckler ◽  
Hernàndez Cristina Luisa Sànchez-Pinto

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document