foraging energetics
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

26
(FIVE YEARS 2)

H-INDEX

15
(FIVE YEARS 1)

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (162) ◽  
pp. 20190632 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan G. Pattrick ◽  
Hamish A. Symington ◽  
Walter Federle ◽  
Beverley J. Glover

Nectar is a common reward provided by plants for pollinators. More concentrated nectar is more rewarding, but also more viscous, and hence more time-consuming to drink. Consequently, theory predicts an optimum concentration for maximizing energy uptake rate, dependent on the mechanics of feeding. For social pollinators such as bumblebees, another important but little-studied aspect of foraging is nectar offloading upon return to the nest. Studying the bumblebee Bombus terrestris , we found that the relationship between viscosity ( µ ) and volumetric transfer rates ( Q ) of sucrose solutions differed between drinking and offloading. For drinking, Q ∝ µ −0.180 , in good agreement with previous work. Although offloading was quicker than drinking, offloading rate decreased faster with viscosity, with Q ∝ µ −0.502 , consistent with constraints imposed by fluid flow through a tube. The difference in mechanics between drinking and offloading nectar leads to a conflict in the optimum concentration for maximizing energy transfer rates. Building a model of foraging energetics, we show that including offloading lowers the maximum rate of energy return to the nest and reduces the concentration which maximizes this rate by around 3%. Using our model, we show that published values of preferred nectar sugar concentrations suggest that bumblebees maximize the overall energy return rather than the instantaneous energy uptake during drinking.


2019 ◽  
Vol 625 ◽  
pp. 205-223 ◽  
Author(s):  
M Guilpin ◽  
V Lesage ◽  
I McQuinn ◽  
JA Goldbogen ◽  
J Potvin ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
John R. B. Lighton

This chapter describes various techniques for measuring metabolic rates of unrestrained organisms in the field. These include stable isotope techniques, which allow the accurate measurement of the carbon dioxide production of wild animals over an interval ranging from a few hours to several days. The main disadvantage of the method is that the measurement is integrative and the organism must be captured on at least two occasions. Alternative techniques for real-time measurement of metabolic rates utilizing flow-through respirometry in wild, unrestrained animals are described, including representative case studies measuring hovering metabolism in wild hummingbirds, the foraging energetics of ants in the wild, and the energetics of nest building in wasps.


2016 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 150111 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryan W. Garrett ◽  
Katherine A. Carlson ◽  
Matthew Scott Goggans ◽  
Michael H. Nesson ◽  
Christopher A. Shepard ◽  
...  

Leafcutter ants cut trimmings from plants, carry them to their underground nests and cut them into smaller pieces before inoculating them with a fungus that serves as a primary food source for the colony. Cutting is energetically costly, so the amount of cutting is important in understanding foraging energetics. Estimates of the cutting density, metres of cutting per square metre of leaf, were made from samples of transported leaf cuttings and of fungal substrate from field colonies of Atta cephalotes and Atta colombica . To investigate cutting inside the nest, we made leaf-processing observations of our laboratory colony, A. cephalotes . We did not observe the commonly reported reduction of the leaf fragments into a pulp, which would greatly increase the energy cost of processing. Video clips of processing behaviours, including behaviours that have not previously been described, are linked. An estimated 2.9 (±0.3) km of cutting with mandibles was required to reduce a square metre of leaf to fungal substrate. Only about 12% (±1%) of this cutting took place outside of the nest. The cutting density and energy cost is lower for leaf material with higher ratios of perimeter to area, so we tested for, and found that the laboratory ants had a preference for leaves that were pre-cut into smaller pieces. Estimates suggest that the energy required to transport and cut up the leaf material is comparable to the metabolic energy available from the fungus grown on the leaves, and so conservation of energy is likely to be a particularly strong selective pressure for leafcutter ants.


Author(s):  
M. R. Enstipp ◽  
F. Daunt ◽  
S. Wanless ◽  
E. M. Humphreys ◽  
K. C. Hamer ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 210 (11) ◽  
pp. 1960-1970 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. C. Yeates ◽  
T. M. Williams ◽  
T. L. Fink

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document