wellbore failure
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

31
(FIVE YEARS 10)

H-INDEX

5
(FIVE YEARS 1)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edward Matteo ◽  
Donald Conley ◽  
Stephen Verzi ◽  
Barry Roberts ◽  
Casey Doyle ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Indra Arifianto ◽  
Rahmat Catur Wibowo

Since 2006, the mud volcano erupted in the Porong area due to wellbore failure triggered by an earthquake (2006) epicenter in the Jogjakarta area. The mud volcano buried several villages with mud and continued erupted until today. Based on the InSAR data, it can be seen that the subsidence is still happening near the dam area and another area that is not related to mud volcano eruption such as the production of two gas fields in the Porong area. Moreover, the Porong area is flat and low, less than 4 meters above sea level. The analysis shows that the subsidence rate in this area is up to 0.5 m/yr. If this subsidence is continuing, the city can be sinking and flooding during the rainy season. The prediction result from this method is about 10 years more and 36 years since in 2006 based on the mudflow rate method.


2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 36-53
Author(s):  
Hussein Saeed Almalikee ◽  
Fahad M. Al-Najm

Directional and horizontal wellbore profiles and optimization of trajectory to minimizeborehole problems are considered the most important part in well planning and design. Thisstudy introduces four types of directional and horizontal wells trajectory plans for Rumailaoilfield by selecting the suitable kick off point (KOP), build section, drop section andhorizontal profile. In addition to the optimized inclination and orientation which wasselected based on Rumaila oilfield geomechanics and wellbore stability analysis so that theoptimum trajectory could be drilled with minimum wellbore instability problems. The fourrecommended types of deviated wellbore trajectories include: Type I (also called Build andHold Trajectory or L shape) which target shallow to medium reservoirs with lowinclination (20o) and less than 500m step out, Type II (S shape) that can be used topenetrate far off reservoir vertically, Type III (also called Deep Kick off wells or J shape)these wells are similar to the L shape profile except the kickoff point is at a deeper depth,and design to reach far-off targets (>500m step out) with more than 30o inclination, andfinally Type IV (horizontal) that penetrates the reservoir horizontally at 90o. The study alsorecommended the suitable drilling mud density that can control wellbore failure for the fourtypes of wellbore trajectory.


Energies ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (20) ◽  
pp. 4019
Author(s):  
Wang ◽  
Weijermars

This study presents a new interface for wellbore stability analysis, which visualizes and quantifies the stress condition around a wellbore at shear and tensile failure. In the first part of this study, the Mohr–Coulomb, Mogi–Coulomb, modified Lade and Drucker–Prager shear failure criteria, and a tensile failure criterion, are applied to compare the differences in the critical wellbore pressure for three basin types with Andersonian stress states. Using traditional wellbore stability window plots, the Mohr–Coulomb criterion consistently gives the narrowest safe mud weight window, while the Drucker–Prager criterion yields the widest window. In the second part of this study, a new type of plot is introduced where the safe drilling window specifies the local magnitude and trajectories of the principal deviatoric stresses for the shear and tensile wellbore failure bounds, as determined by dimensionless variables, the Frac number (F) and the Bi-axial Stress scalar (χ), in combination with failure criteria. The influence of both stress and fracture cages increases with the magnitude of the F values, but reduces with depth. The extensional basin case is more prone to potential wellbore instability induced by circumferential fracture propagation, because fracture cages persists at greater depths than for the compressional and strike-slip basin cases.


SPE Journal ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 24 (05) ◽  
pp. 2064-2082
Author(s):  
Wenjun Huang ◽  
Deli Gao ◽  
Yinghua Liu

Summary With oil and gas wells extending deeper and deeper, downhole conditions become increasingly complicated, and thus increasingly sophisticated wellbore models are needed. Current wellbore models usually neglect the coupling effect in the cement–consolidation process and do not sufficiently consider the whole operation process of the wellbore. To overcome these shortcomings, short–term and long–term mechanical wellbore models while considering the relevant stages in wellbore life are built. In the short–term model, wellbore–operation stages include casing running, cement displacement, and cement consolidation. The governing equation of cement consolidation while considering the coupling effect between cement hardening and volume change is presented. In the long–term model, the governing equation of formation creep while considering prestresses and initial strains is given. The elastic/viscoelastic–correspondence principle and stress–superposition method are used to simplify the derivation. Next, the effects of relevant factors on short–term and long–term wellbore stresses are analyzed. The results show that wellbore stresses caused by cement consolidation will be underestimated when the coupling effects are neglected. The most vulnerable positions for wellbore failure are on different cylinder elements under different wellbore stages. Wellbore properties, short–term stresses, and formation creep greatly affect wellbore mechanical behaviors. Therefore, the new model provides an important basis for wellbore–failure prediction and optimal design.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document