Abstract
Background
Several guidelines have suggested alternative glycemic markers for hemoglobin A1c among older adults with limited life expectancy or multiple coexisting chronic illnesses. We evaluated associations between fructosamine, albumin-corrected fructosamine (AlbF) and fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and mortality in the diabetic and non-diabetic subpopulations, compared which marker better predicts mortality among participants aged 80 and above.
Methods
Included were 2,238 subjects from the Healthy Ageing and Biomarkers Cohort Study (2012-2018) and 207 participants had diabetes at baseline. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models investigated the associations of fructosamine, AlbF, FPG and all-cause, cardiovascular disease (CVD), and non-CVD mortality in the diabetic and non-diabetic subpopulations. Restricted cubic splines (RCS) explored potential non-linear relations. C-statistic, integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) and net reclassification improvement (NRI) evaluated the additive value of different glycemic markers to predict mortality.
Results
Overall, 1,191 deaths were documented during 6,793 person-years of follow-up. In the linear model, per unit increases of fructosamine, AlbF and FPG were associated with higher risk of mortality in non-diabetic participants, with hazard ratios of 1.02 (1.00, 1.05), 1.27 (1.14, 1.42) and 1.04 (0.98, 1.11) for all-cause mortality, and 1.04 (1.00, 1.07), 1.38 (1.19, 1.59) and 1.10 (1.01, 1.19) for non-CVD mortality, respectively. Comparisons indicated AlbF better predicts all-cause and non-CVD mortality in non-diabetic participants with significant improvement in IDI and NRI.
Conclusions
Higher concentrations of fructosamine, AlbF, and FPG were associated with higher risk of all-cause or non-CVD mortality among very elderly where AlbF may constitute an alternative prospective glycemic predictor of mortality.