welfare impacts
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

298
(FIVE YEARS 88)

H-INDEX

27
(FIVE YEARS 5)

2022 ◽  
Vol 195 ◽  
pp. 103309
Author(s):  
Brian Chiputwa ◽  
Genowefa Blundo-Canto ◽  
Peter Steward ◽  
Nadine Andrieu ◽  
Ousmane Ndiaye

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Anderson ◽  
Minwoo Hyun ◽  
Jaecheol Lee
Keyword(s):  

2022 ◽  
Vol 102 ◽  
pp. 103146
Author(s):  
Anna Straubinger ◽  
Erik T. Verhoef ◽  
Henri L.F. de Groot

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael L. Anderson ◽  
Minwoo Hyun ◽  
Jaecheol Lee
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-23
Author(s):  
Rayan Wolf ◽  
Angelo C. Gurgel ◽  
Leonardo C. B. Cardoso ◽  
Ian M. Trotter ◽  
Marcos S. Nazareth ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 481-492
Author(s):  
Claudia A.F. Wascher ◽  
Niklas Baur ◽  
Marietta Hengl ◽  
Carina Köck ◽  
Teresa Pegger ◽  
...  

Behavioral responses of captive animals to the presence of visitors in zoos and wildlife parks can be interpreted as signs of negative (disturbance), neutral or positive (enrichment) welfare. In the present study, we investigated behavioral responses of captive common ravens, Corvus corax and crows, Corvus corone, to the presence of visitors in general and to the proximity or distance of visitors to the aviary respectively. Duration of affiliative behaviors, feeding and stress-related behaviors did not change when visitors were present compared to control situations without visitors being present. Both corvid species showed less head up behavior when visitors were in sight compared to the control condition. In contrast, preening of crows significantly increased when visitors were within two meters of the aviary compared to the control condition. The same relationship was found in regard to increase in vocalization for common ravens, but not for crows. Our results indicate that corvids, housed in a wildlife park for several years, still show behavioral responses to the presence of human visitors in close proximity to their enclosure. Overall, we did not find clear indications for reduced welfare due to visitor presence, such as increased locomotion or stress-related behaviors. We therefore conclude that the described behavioral changes are not indicative of any negative welfare impacts of visitor presence.


Animals ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (9) ◽  
pp. 2748
Author(s):  
Ann Wilson ◽  
Clive J. C. Phillips

African lion (Panthera leo) cubs are extensively used in South Africa in wildlife-interaction tourist activities. Facilities provide close interaction opportunities, but the welfare impacts on the cubs are unclear. A workshop was held with 15 lion-experienced stakeholders, including government officials, nature conservationists, animal welfare organisations, lion breeders, lion handlers, an animal ethologist, wildlife veterinarian, wildlife rehabilitation specialist and an animal rights advocacy group representative. Individual representatives nominated a range of welfare concerns, and 15 were identified for discussion and prioritisation. The leading welfare concern was a lack of governance and regulation within the industry. Participants agreed on nine non-negotiable practices affecting welfare concerns, which included ethical concerns, such as cubs exiting into the ranching industry (farming of lions for hunting) and the bone trade (lions being slaughtered for their bones, which are exported for lion bone wine) once petting age has passed. Welfare concerns representative of current management practices within the lion cub interaction industry were compared for importance using an online adaptive conjoint analysis survey of 60 stakeholders in the industry. The survey identified the most important welfare concerns to be poor social grouping of cubs, an inability for cubs to choose their own environment and retreat from a forced interaction, a lack of trained and dedicated caretakers, and poor breeding practices. The conjoint analysis survey results produced a value model, which can be used as a tool to score cubs’ welfare in interaction facilities, and it identified unacceptable practices lacking welfare consideration.


2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (18) ◽  
pp. 10121
Author(s):  
Kristīne Pakalniete ◽  
Heini Ahtiainen ◽  
Juris Aigars ◽  
Ingrīda Andersone ◽  
Aurelija Armoškaite ◽  
...  

Knowledge of ecosystem services (ES) and the benefits provided by offshore marine areas, including the welfare impacts from the establishment of marine protected areas (MPAs) is still limited. In the present study we evaluated benefits from ES, citizens’ willingness-to-pay for potential changes in the provision of ES, and welfare losses to citizens due to restrictions on economic activities from establishing new offshore MPAs in Latvian waters. The scenarios for the economic valuation were based on analysing the supply of ES from the protected marine habitats, showing changes in the ES supply in policy relevant scenarios of the MPA size. Our study evaluates a wide array of ES delivered by offshore protected habitats and reveals that citizens’ willingness-to-pay for preserving habitats and ES supply exceeds their welfare losses from restrictions in economic activities. Our approach supports the prioritisation of habitat types according to their contribution to ES supply and benefits for citizens. The analysis can be complemented with spatial data regarding distribution of habitats, providing an opportunity to identify areas with the highest ES benefits to support marine protection and spatial planning.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document