pollutant loading
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

86
(FIVE YEARS 14)

H-INDEX

11
(FIVE YEARS 2)

2022 ◽  
Vol 303 ◽  
pp. 114147
Author(s):  
Haibin Yan ◽  
Arlette Fernandez ◽  
David Z. Zhu ◽  
Wenming Zhang ◽  
Mark R. Loewen ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 129953
Author(s):  
Nasrin Alamdari ◽  
Peter Claggett ◽  
David J. Sample ◽  
Zachary M. Easton ◽  
Mohammad Nayeb Yazdi

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (20) ◽  
pp. 9694
Author(s):  
Ji-Yun Jang ◽  
Dae-Woong Kim ◽  
Ye-Ji Choi ◽  
Dong-Woo Jang

For urban streams, wastewater inflow makes water quality management difficult. This study attempted to analyze the water quality characteristics and pollution sources for the efficient management of water quality in the upper, middle, and lower Gul-po stream reaches. The water quality and flow characteristics for each point were analyzed using five-year water quality and flow discharge data at Gul-po stream from 2016 to 2020. The results showed that the flow increased and the water quality improved in the upper part of the stream, under the influence of a treated water discharge. The flow–pollutant loading equation revealed that the flow coefficient (slope of the regression equation) values of the water quality characteristics, except T-N, were lower than 1 in the upper part, indicating that the water quality decreased as the flow increased. In the middle and lower parts, the flow index values of the water quality characteristics, except T-N, were greater than 1, indicating that the water quality increased with the flow. For the middle and lower parts, the overage rate of target water quality by the Ministry of Environment was high for high-flow discharge sections, indicating the significant influence of nonpoint pollution sources. These results show that it is necessary to consider different pollution sources at each point for urban stream quality management.


Hydrology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 4
Author(s):  
Manashi Paul ◽  
Masoud Negahban-Azar ◽  
Adel Shirmohammadi ◽  
Hubert Montas

Groundwater is the main source of irrigation and residential use in the Eastern Shore Maryland, which is experiencing challenges regarding overuse, saltwater intrusion, and diminishing productivity. The Chesapeake Bay is also facing the problem of water pollution due to pollutant loading from agricultural fields and wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs). Using recycled water for irrigation has the potential to alleviate the pressure on groundwater and reduce pollutant loading. The objective of this study was to develop a decision tool to explore the use of recycled water for agricultural irrigation in Maryland using Multicriteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) integrated with Geographical Information Systems (GIS). Four main evaluation criteria were included in the GIS-MCDA framework: agricultural land cover, climate, groundwater vulnerability, and characteristics of the WWTPs as sources of recycled water. Groundwater vulnerability zones were developed using the groundwater well density, water extraction data, and the aquifer information. Then, the most suitable areas for irrigation using recycled water were identified. About 13.5% and 32.9% of agricultural land was, respectively, found to be “highly” and “moderately” suitable for irrigation with recycled water when WWTPs were categorized based on their treatment process information. The results provide a useful decision tool to promote the use of recycled water for agricultural irrigation.


2020 ◽  
Vol 192 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sania El-Nakib ◽  
Ibrahim Alameddine ◽  
May Massoud ◽  
Majdi Abou Najm

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (12) ◽  
pp. 3326-3340
Author(s):  
Manoj Kumar ◽  
Rajesh Singh

In this study, two-phase continuous vertical flow constructed wetlands were installed with a pre-cleaner bioelectrochemical system for the removal of NH4+-N (60.41–85.78%), NO3−-N (25.55–35.18%), TN (57.80–84.65%), TKN (37.24–70.08%), PO43−-P (38.89–63.40%), SO42− (49.53–76.06%), and COD (25.83–74.70%) from municipal wastewater.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document