posterior capsulotomy
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

286
(FIVE YEARS 46)

H-INDEX

29
(FIVE YEARS 2)

2022 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ki Won Jin ◽  
Se Joon Woo ◽  
Kyu Hyung Park

Abstract Purpose To evaluate the necessity and safety of primary posterior capsulotomy during phaco-vitrectomy for idiopathic epiretinal membrane (ERM). Setting Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea. Design Retrospective consecutive cohort analysis. Methods This study enrolled 219 patients (228 eyes) who underwent combined 25-gauge phaco-vitrectomy for idiopathic ERM and cataract, divided into capsulotomy (−) group (152 eyes, 144 patients) and capsulotomy (+) group (76 eyes, 75 patients). The main outcomes were rate of posterior capsular opacity (PCO) occurrence and postoperative complications. Ophthalmic examinations were performed at baseline, 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. Results PCO only occurred in capsulotomy (−) group (20 eyes, 13.2%), with mean onset of 10.59 months. Visually-significant PCO that needed Nd:YAG posterior capsulotomy was present in 9 eyes (45.0% of PCO eyes). The rate of cystoid macular edema (CME) was higher in capsulotomy (+) group (6.6% vs. 15.8%, p = 0.026) with longer duration (1.50 vs. 3.36 months, p = 0.019). Female sex and posterior capsulotomy were significant risk factors for CME occurrence (p < 0.05). Conclusion Primary posterior capsulotomy during phaco-vitrectomy for idiopathic ERM obviated the need for Nd:YAG posterior capsulotomy, but visually-significant PCO that needed Nd:YAG laser was not common. Considering the low rate of visually-significant PCO and high rate of postoperative CME, routine posterior capsulotomy during phaco-vitrectomy may not be necessary for preventing PCO in ERM.


2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 145-148
Author(s):  
Angie Nolly-Loyaga ◽  
Rosita Aguirre-Flores ◽  
Fiorela Castro-Avalos ◽  
Manuel Zegarra-Domínguez ◽  
Artemio Burga-Valdivia

Cureus ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ana-María Dorado-López-Rosado ◽  
Enrique Mencía-Gutiérrez ◽  
María Polo-García ◽  
Esperanza Gutiérrez-Díaz

2021 ◽  
pp. 112067212110094
Author(s):  
Giuseppe Lo Giudice ◽  
Edoardo Angelini ◽  
Silvia Bini ◽  
Tommaso Candian ◽  
Clorinda Crudeli ◽  
...  

Purpose: To describe, retrospectively, the visual outcome, feasibility, and safety of cataract surgery in a pediatric population affected by iatrogenic cataract, secondary to systemic oncological treatment for malignancies other than retinoblastoma. Methods: Young patients, affected by radiation-induced cataract, who were referred to the San Paolo Ophthalmic Center in Padova between 2010 and 2017, were included in the study. All patients had previously received radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy treatment for malignancies, between 2004 and 2013. All medical records of infants who underwent cataract surgery were accurately reviewed. Results: Eighteen eyes out of 11 patients included in the study underwent cataract surgery. The mean age at surgery was 9.7 ± 3.6 years. The interval between tumor diagnosis and cataract development was around 3 years. Mean follow-up after surgery was 15.4 ± 6.3 months. All eyes underwent posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation, posterior capsulotomy, and anterior vitrectomy in one time surgery. No intraoperative complications were shown. Post-operatively, only one eye received laser capsulotomy due to posterior capsule opacification. At the end of follow up, best-corrected visual acuity was 20/20 (LogMAR 0) in all eyes and significantly improved ( p < 0.01) compared to baseline. Conclusions: Iatrogenic-cataract surgery in pediatric oncological patients is a safe and effective way to improve visual acuity. Posterior capsulotomy and anterior vitrectomy at the time of surgery reduce the rate of posterior lens opacification and guarantee an excellent visual acuity in these patients.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document