secretory igm
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

35
(FIVE YEARS 2)

H-INDEX

13
(FIVE YEARS 2)

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 1749 ◽  
Author(s):  
Veronique Demers-Mathieu ◽  
Ciera DaPra ◽  
Gabrielle Mathijssen ◽  
David A. Sela ◽  
Kirsi M. Järvinen ◽  
...  

Background: Preexisting immunity to SARS-CoV-2 could be related to cross-reactive antibodies to common human-coronaviruses (HCoVs). This study aimed to evaluate whether human milk antibodies against to S1 and S2 subunits SARS-CoV-2 are cross-reactive to S1 and S2 subunits HCoV-OC43 and HCoV-229E in mothers with a confirmed COVID-19 PCR test, in mothers with previous viral symptoms during COVID-19 pandemic, and in unexposed mothers; Methods: The levels of secretory IgA (SIgA)/IgA, secretory IgM (SIgM)/IgM, and IgG specific to S1 and S2 SARS-CoV-2, and reactive to S1 + S2 HCoV-OC43, and HCoV-229E were measured in milk from 7 mothers with a confirmed COVID-19 PCR test, 20 mothers with viral symptoms, and unexposed mothers (6 Ctl1-2018 and 16 Ctl2-2018) using ELISA; Results: The S2 SARS-CoV-2 IgG levels were higher in the COVID-19 PCR (p = 0.014) and viral symptom (p = 0.040) groups than in the Ctl1-2018 group. We detected a higher number of positive correlations between the antigens and secretory antibodies in the COVID-19 PCR group than in the viral symptom and Ctl-2018 groups. S1 + S2 HCoV-OC43-reactive IgG was higher in the COVID-19 group than in the control group (p = 0.002) but did not differ for the other antibodies; Conclusions: Mothers with a confirmed COVID-19 PCR and mothers with previous viral symptoms had preexisting human milk antibodies against S2 subunit SARS-CoV-2. Human milk IgG were more specific to S2 subunit SARS-CoV-2 than other antibodies, whereas SIgA and SIgM were polyreactive and cross-reactive to S1 or S2 subunit SARS-CoV-2.


2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (2) ◽  
pp. 141-156 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eva Michaud ◽  
Carmelo Mastrandrea ◽  
Nicolas Rochereau ◽  
Stéphane Paul

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (6) ◽  
pp. 696-710 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chih-Hang Anthony Tang ◽  
Shiun Chang ◽  
Ayumi Hashimoto ◽  
Yi-Ju Chen ◽  
Chang Won Kang ◽  
...  

Immunity ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 47 (1) ◽  
pp. 118-134.e8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giuliana Magri ◽  
Laura Comerma ◽  
Marc Pybus ◽  
Jordi Sintes ◽  
David Lligé ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 85 (1) ◽  
pp. 43-50 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. E. Michaelsen ◽  
S. Emilsen ◽  
R. H. Sandin ◽  
B. K. Granerud ◽  
D. Bratlie ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tiziana Anelli ◽  
Eelco van Anken

Fidelity of the humoral immune response requires that quiescent B lymphocytes display membrane bound immunoglobulin M (IgM) on B lymphocytes surface as part of the B cell receptor, whose function is to recognize an antigen. At the same time B lymphocytes should not secrete IgM until recognition of the antigen has occurred. The heavy chains of the secretory IgM have a C-terminal tail with a cysteine instead of a membrane anchor, which serves to covalently link the IgM subunits by disulfide bonds to form “pentamers” or “hexamers.” By virtue of the same cysteine, unassembled secretory IgM subunits are recognized and retained (via mixed disulfide bonds) by members of the protein disulfide isomerase family, in particular ERp44. This so-called “thiol-mediated retention” bars assembly intermediates from prematurely leaving the cell and thereby exerts quality control on the humoral immune response. In this essay we discuss recent findings on how ERp44 governs such assembly control in a pH-dependent manner, shuttling between the cisGolgi and endoplasmic reticulum, and finally on how pERp1/MZB1, possibly as a co-chaperone of GRP94, may help to overrule the thiol-mediated retention in the activated B cell to give way to antibody secretion.


Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 2659-2659 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Christina Cox ◽  
Arianna Di Napoli ◽  
Stefania Scarpino ◽  
Elena Cavalieri ◽  
Virginia Naso ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 2659 Background: Gene-expression-profiling defined at least two main groups within Diffuse-large-B-cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) patients who have substantially different outcomes: Activated-B-cell (ABC-type) and Germinal-Center-B-cell (GCB-type). The translation of gene-expression-profiling arrays into robust algorithm useful for clinical purposes is still in progress. The detection of IgM monoclonal component (IgM MC) in DLBCL has been previously described in a few reports, mainly because it was associated with autoimmune hemolytic anaemia. To our knowledge this is the first report describing the incidence and prognosis of a series of DLBCL with IgM MC. Aims: In this report we compared clinical and biological features of DLBCL patients with and without secretory IgM MC . Patients & Methods: Within a consecutive series of 132 patients, diagnosed between September 2004 and April 2012 with conventional DLBCL, 16 cases (12%) with a IgM MC were identified. We selected a set of 95 consecutive DLBCL patients, treated with 6–8 cycles of RCHOP-like for comparison of histological features and survival. Only cases with a follow up time >24 months were included, unless a DLBCL–related event (i.e. primary refractoriness or relapse) had occurred earlier. Biological material was obtained after receiving patient's consent. This study was approved by our Institutional-Review-Board. Immunohistochemistry and FISH: Paraffin sections were immunostained for CD3, CD5, CD20, CD10, CD30, CD79a, CD138, ALK-1, MUM1, BCL2, BCL6, IgM, Kappa and Lambda immunoglobulin light chains, using an automated immunostainer (DAKO, Denmark). The Hans algorithm was used in order to classify cases as GCB-type and non GCB-type. FISH with Vysis break-apart probe was used to assess c-MYC gene abnormalities in tissue sections (Abbott Molecular Inc. US). Statistics: univariate comparisons between groups were carried out with appropriate non parametric test. Survival analyses were done by the Kaplan-Meier method, the analyses of factor predicting survival were carried out by the log-rank test. Cox's regression was used for multivariate analyses. The SPSS19 package (SPSS Inc.Chicago IL) was used for elaborations. Histology, immunohistochemistry and FISH Results: In 14 out of 16 cases (87.5%) the IgM MC was related to the DLBCL clone. This was ascertained by immunostaining of cytoplasm for IgM, Kappa and Lambda immunoglobulin light chains. All the 14 cases were classified as non GCB-type. FISH analysis detected no c-MYC gene rearrangements in all the cases. Clinical Results: The incidence of bone marrow involvement, two or more extranodal sites, female sex, IPI score 3–5 and failure to achieve CR on RCHOP treatment were significantly more frequent in the IgM MC group. Noteworthy four out of 14 patients had central nervous system involvement at diagnosis or at relapse. All but one, with a previous diagnosis of marginal zone lymphoma, were de novo DLBCL. Twelve patients (85.7%) presented a DLBCL related event compared to 35 patients (37%) without IgM MC (p=.001). Seven patients (50%) died with primary refractory or relapsed-chemoresistant disease, another one died of an adverse event during chemotherapy. Two are alive on salvage treatment, two are in PFS at +30 and +13 months after salvage treatment with Bortezomib-RDHAP followed by high dose therapy. Only two patients are in PFS after first line RCHOP at +56 and +29 months respectively. Survival analysis: The estimated two-year EFS, PFS and OS were significantly worst for IgM MC group (22% Vs 70%, p<.0001; 22% Vs 75%, p<.0001; 50% Vs 85%, p=.011, respectively). In multivariate analysis IgM MC was the only significant factor for EFS (p=.001; 0.194 CI:0.089–0.57) while for PFS were both significant the IgM-MC (p=0.014; 0.360; 5%CI: 0,159–0,815) and the IPI-score 3–5 (p=.002; 0.186; 95% CI 0.063–0.552). Conclusions: A secretory IgM MC related to the neoplastic clone, was detected in more than 10% of newly diagnosed DLBCL. IgM MC in DLBCL might be easily missed, given its negligible entity, the rarity of associated clinical signs and the rapid MC fading during treatment. This group showed homogeneous morphologic and immunohistochemical features consistent with the non GCB-type. FISH analysis was negative for c-MYC gene rearrangements. IgM MC in DLBCL patients, might be related to a very poor non GCB-type subset who should be given upfront intensified therapies. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document