catalog number
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

40
(FIVE YEARS 16)

H-INDEX

3
(FIVE YEARS 1)

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
moch lukluil maknun ◽  
Subhan Ridlo ◽  
umi masfiah ◽  
Bisri Ruchani ◽  
Roch Aris Hidayat

The cataloging of Madurese religious texts is carried out in stages based on location.In 2016, cataloging began with manuscripts collected in Sumenep.Although the Sumenep manuscripts collected in this catalog number in the hundreds,but actually can not cover the entire manuscript that is in allSumenep area which is divided into 27 districts. The existence of the manuscript inSumenep is different from other locations, because it is spread/stored in the middlecommunity, not united in some places.


Bionomina ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
R. ALEXANDER PYRON ◽  
STEVE GOTTE ◽  
FRANK T. BURBRINK

Here, we provide updates to our recent paper reviewing the taxonomy and nomenclature of the Eastern ratsnakes (Pantherophis obsoletus complex, Colubridae, Serpentes). Specifically, we clarify that Coluber alleghaniensis Holbrook, 1836 is a subjective, rather than objective, senior synonym of Elaphis holbrookii Duméril, Bibron & Duméril, 1854. Contrary to our statement that USNM 1733–4 were syntypes of Scotophis lindheimerii Baird & Girard, 1853, the former is the holotype and the latter is the paratype. The holotype is lost and the paratype is in poor condition, but no neotype designation is warranted at present. We note that USNM 248870, which we designated as the lectotype of Coluber obsoletus lemniscatus Cope, 1888, was originally cataloged as USNM 4710. This catalog number was shared with the type of the salamander Amblystoma tenebrosum Baird & Girard, 1852, and the snake was re-cataloged as USNM 248870 in 1985. Finally, we originally treated C. reticulatus La Cépède, 1789 and C. reticularis Daudin, 1803 as senior subjective synonyms of C. corais Boie, 1827, but here corroborate recent authors in designating it a senior subjective synonym of C. obsoletus Say in James, 1823. As the Commission suppressed C. reticulatus La Cépède, 1789 (an exoplonym), this subsequently rendered C. reticularis Daudin, 1803 (an exoploneonym) unavailable as well.


Author(s):  
C. Gómez-Guijarro ◽  
D. Elbaz ◽  
M. Xiao ◽  
M. Béthermin ◽  
M. Franco ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emmanuel Kagning Tsinda ◽  
Masahiro Sakamoto ◽  
Michiko Okamoto ◽  
Clyde Dapat ◽  
Mariko Saito ◽  
...  

This protocol describes the steps to prepare DNA libraries from PCR amplicons using the Illumina DNA prep library kit. The current library preparation protocol was adapted from the original Illumina DNA Prep Reference Guide (document #1000000025416 v09) using low input DNA samples as the starting material. We omitted laboratory equipment such as the Eppendorf 96-well PCR plate, microseal adhesive seals. In addition, we replaced 96-well plate magnetic stand with a magnetic stand suitable for 1.5 ml tubes. The added value of this protocol is that PCR reactions happen in 0.2 ml PCR tubes, and it can be implemented without a separate purchase of 96-well PCR plates or a magnetic stand for PCR plates. Using individual 0.2 ml tubes increases the user flexibility when running few samples for library preparation. The other advantage of using our adapted protocol is the reduced library preparation cost when running few specimens. For instance, implementing the current protocol might be cheaper than the original Illumina protocol when using the Illumina® DNA Prep, (M) Tagmentation (24 Samples) catalog number 20018704. The protocol has proven effective for processing hundreds of DNA libraries from tiled virus amplicons such as Sapovirus and SARS-CoV-2 submitted to public repositories such as GISAID and GenBank.


2021 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 87-112
Author(s):  
Samuel L. Boyd

Abstract The cosmology as described in the creation account in Gen 1:1–2:4a has occasioned endless commentary. One of the more perceptive studies of this text was published by Baruch Halpern in 2003. In this article, I review Halpern’s argument and add evidence from iconography at Ugarit. The Baal Stele (Louvre catalog number AO 15775), in which the deity holds lightning and stands with the king, also displays a cosmology that has intriguing connections with Halpern’s thesis about an “expanse of the earth.” After connecting Halpern’s thesis to this visual representation of cosmology from Ugarit, I explore the ways in which both text and image are mutually illuminating and help to interpret one another, extending the analysis to so-called Deutero-Isaiah and Ps 136 as well.


Genetika ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 53 (2) ◽  
pp. 583-591
Author(s):  
Hüseyin Uysal ◽  
Emre Sevindik

This study was carried out in order to develop an embryo culture technique and to establish breeding lines with this technique. Ovule culture was preferred in the study because the seeds were too small and embryo isolation was difficult. Embryo cultures were done by using populations obtained from producers in Samsun, Denizli, Isparta, Mersin in Turkey and ?ameli black cumin variety. Hybridizations were done according to the semi-diallel hybridization method to gain zygotic embryos. LS2.5 and MS (Sigma Aldrich Catalog number: M5519) mediums were used for ovule culture and MSD4 medium was used growing the plants obtained from the ovules. As a result of the research, a total of 2904 ovules were cultured in LS2.5 medium. 148 of them showed callus development; callus formation rate was 5.10%. The highest callus formation rate in the investigated combinations was obtained from ?ameli x Denizli combination at 7.26%. Plant regeneration could not be obtained from these calluses. A total of 3526 ovules were cultured in MS medium. Sixty plantlets were obtained from these ovules and plant formation rate was determined as 1.70%. 41 plants from these matured and were harvested.


2020 ◽  
Vol 251 (1) ◽  
pp. 2
Author(s):  
Alberto Masini ◽  
Ryan C. Hickox ◽  
Christopher M. Carroll ◽  
James Aird ◽  
David M. Alexander ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
David Shorthouse ◽  
Jocelyn Pender ◽  
Richard Rabeler ◽  
James Macklin

A discussion session held at a National Science Foundation-sponsored Herbarium Networks Workshop at Michigan State University in September of 2004 resulted in a rallying objective: make all botanical specimen information in United States collections available online by 2020. Rabeler and Macklin 2006 outlined a toolkit for realizing this ambitious goal, which included: a review of relevant and state-of-the-art web resources, data exchange standards and, mechanisms to maximize efficiencies while minimizing costs. a review of relevant and state-of-the-art web resources, data exchange standards and, mechanisms to maximize efficiencies while minimizing costs. Given that we are now in the year 2020, it seems appropriate to examine the progress towards the objective of making all US botanical specimen collections data available online. Our presentation will attempt to answer several questions: How close have we come to meeting the original objective? What fraction of “digitized” specimens are minimally represented by a catalog number, a determination, and/or a photograph? What fraction has been thoroughly transcribed? How close have we come to attaining a seamlessly integrated, comprehensive, and national view of botanical specimen data that guides a stakeholder to appropriate resources regardless of their entry point? What “holes” in this effort still exist and what might be required to fill them? How close have we come to meeting the original objective? What fraction of “digitized” specimens are minimally represented by a catalog number, a determination, and/or a photograph? What fraction has been thoroughly transcribed? How close have we come to attaining a seamlessly integrated, comprehensive, and national view of botanical specimen data that guides a stakeholder to appropriate resources regardless of their entry point? What “holes” in this effort still exist and what might be required to fill them? Given our interest in the success of both the Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF) and the Integrated Digitized Biocollections (iDigBio), as well as the overwhelming likelihood that either one of these initiatives is the usual entry point for someone seeking US-based botanical data, we approached the answers to the above questions by first crafting a repeatable data download and processing workflow in early July 2020. This resulted in 25.6M records of plant, fungi, and Chromista from 216 datasets available through GBIF and 32.8M comparable records available through iDigBio from 525 recordsets. We attempted to align these seemingly discordant sets of records and also chose Darwin Core terms that were best suited to match the four hierarchical levels of digitization defined in the Minimal Information for Digital Specimens (MIDS) (van Egmond et al. 2019). During the analysis/comparison of the datasets, we found several examples where the number of data records from an institution seemed much lower than expected. From a combination of analyzing record content in GBIF/iDigBio and consulting regional/taxonomic portals, it became evident that, besides datasets only being included in either GBIF or iDigBio, there was a significant number of records in regional/taxonomic portals that were not yet made available through either GBIF or iDigBio. Progress on digitization has benefited greatly from the US National Science Foundation's creation of the Advancing Digitization of Biodiversity Collections (ADBC) program, and funding of the 15 Thematic Collection Networks (TCN). The launching of new projects and the ensuing digitization of herbarium collections have led to a multitude of new specimen portals and the enhancement of existing software like Symbiota (Gries et al. 2014). But, it has also led to insufficient data sharing among projects and inadequately aligned data synchronization practices between aggregators. Consistency in terms of data availability and quality between GBIF and iDigBio is low, and the chronic lack of record-level identifiers consistently restricts the flow of enhancements made to records. We conclude that there remains substantial work to be done on the national infrastructure and on international best practices to help facilitate collaboration and to realize the original objective of making all US botanical specimen collections data available online.


2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Vincent Loiseau ◽  
Richard Cordaux ◽  
Isabelle Giraud ◽  
Agnès Beby-Defaux ◽  
Nicolas Lévêque ◽  
...  

Abstract The use of misidentified cell lines contaminated by other cell lines and/or microorganisms has generated much confusion in the scientific literature. Detailed characterization of such contaminations is therefore crucial to avoid misinterpretation and ensure robustness and reproducibility of research. Here we use DNA-seq data produced in our lab to first confirm that the Hep2 (clone 2B) cell line (Sigma-Aldrich catalog number: 85011412-1VL) is indistinguishable from the HeLa cell line by mapping integrations of the human papillomavirus 18 (HPV18) at their expected loci on chromosome 8. We then show that the cell line is also contaminated by a xenotropic murine leukemia virus (XMLV) that is nearly identical to the mouse Bxv1 provirus and we characterize one Bxv1 provirus, located in the second intron of the pseudouridylate synthase 1 (PUS1) gene. Using an RNA-seq dataset, we confirm the high expression of the E6 and E7 HPV18 oncogenes, show that the entire Bxv1 genome is moderately expressed, and retrieve a Bxv1 splicing event favouring expression of the env gene. Hep2 (clone 2B) is the fourth human cell line so far known to be contaminated by the Bxv1 XMLV. This contamination has to be taken into account when using the cell line in future experiments.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document