combine test
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

11
(FIVE YEARS 6)

H-INDEX

2
(FIVE YEARS 1)

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (02) ◽  
pp. E59-E64
Author(s):  
Jordan Riley Pollock ◽  
Matthew K. Doan ◽  
Walker L. Asprey ◽  
Donald L. Dulle ◽  
M. Lane Moore ◽  
...  

AbstractThe National Football League Scouting Combine is an annual event held to evaluate football players. The results of the combine are used to identify talent and player potential. Our study aims to examine the relationship between combine drill performance (e.g., speed, power, agility, explosiveness) and career longevity. We performed a retrospective review of The National Football League combine test results for all defensive players from 2005–2015 to determine the association of each player’s combine test results with career longevity. The position that had the most significant associations for 1-year status was linebackers, with weight, 10-yard dash, 20-yard dash, 40-yard dash, broad jump, 3-cone drill, and shuttle being significantly associated with 1-year roster status. The position that had the most significant associations for 5-year status was cornerbacks, with weight, 10-yard dash, 20-yard dash, 40-yard dash, 3-cone drill, and shuttle being significantly associated with 1-year roster status. The least number of significant associations was found for safeties, with no drill being associated with 1-year roster status and only height and shuttle time significantly associated with 5-year career longevity. Our study demonstrates the utility of the combine results to help estimate the career longevity of NFL defensive players.


Author(s):  
Javier García-Rubio ◽  
Daniel Carreras ◽  
Sebastian Feu ◽  
Antonio Antunez ◽  
Sergio J. Ibáñez

The NBA Draft Combine includes a series of standardized measurements and drills that provide NBA teams with an opportunity to evaluate players. The purpose of this research was to identify the Combine tests that explain draft position and future performance in the NBA rookie season. Variables were selected from the previous categories of anthropometric measurements and strength and agility tests. A regression analysis was carried out. Combine variables, anthropometric and agility/strength variables were analyzed to explore their effect on draft position. Moreover, correlation analyses were performed to identify relationships among: (i) Combine anthropometric and strength and agility measures and game performance through game related statistics; and (ii) the draft position and game performance using Pearson’s correlation coefficients. Results show that the Combine test does not predict draft position, with the exception of hand width and height in frontcourt players, and standard vertical jump and running vertical jump. Future performance indicators were explained by several Combine tests in all players.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthias Wegerhoff ◽  
Roland Sottek ◽  
Haiko Brücher
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Linda Geerligs ◽  
Eric Maris

AbstractBecause of the high dimensionality of neuroimaging data, identifying a statistical test that is both valid and maximally sensitive is an important challenge. Here, we present a combination of two approaches for fMRI data analysis that together result in substantial improvements of the sensitivity of cluster-based statistics. The first approach is to create novel cluster definitions that are sensitive to physiologically plausible effect patterns. The second is to adopt a new approach to combine test statistics with different sensitivity profiles, which we call the min(p) method. These innovations are made possible by using the randomization inference framework. In this paper, we report on a set of simulations that demonstrate (1) that the proposed methods control the false-alarm rate, (2) that the sensitivity profiles of cluster-based test statistics vary depending on the cluster defining thresholds and cluster definitions, and (3) that the min(p) method for combining these test statistics results in a drastic increase of sensitivity (up to five-fold), compared to existing fMRI analysis methods. This increase in sensitivity is not at the expense of the spatial specificity of the inference.


2019 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yixiong Cui ◽  
Fuzheng Liu ◽  
Dapeng Bao ◽  
Haoyang Liu ◽  
Shaoliang Zhang ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 32 (5) ◽  
pp. 1288-1296 ◽  
Author(s):  
Todd J. Leutzinger ◽  
Zachary M. Gillen ◽  
Amelia M. Miramonti ◽  
Brianna D. McKay ◽  
Alegra I. Mendez ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document