Efficiency of Surber net under different substrate and flow conditions: insights for macroinvertebrates sampling and river biomonitoring

In biomonitoring great attention has been paid on the selection of the best indices and metrics, often neglecting a simple but fundamental aspect: how reliable are the sampling methodologies? We tested the efficiency of the Surber net in collecting stream macroinvertebrates by comparing two samples collected consecutively on the same plot. We found that substrate particle size and water depth and velocity significantly affected sampling efficiency, especially regarding the total taxa richness, EPT (Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera and Trichoptera) richness and density. This study therefore provides useful insights to collect stream macroinvertebrates using the Surber net under different near-bed conditions.

Spatially Varying Trophic Effects of Reservoir-Derived Plankton on Stream Macroinvertebrates Among Heterogeneous Habitats Within Reaches

SummaryDam reservoirs often supply high amounts of plankton to downstream reaches, leading to a critical shift of trophic origins of stream ecosystems from natural sources (e.g. attached algae and terrestrial inputs) to reservoir-oriented plankton. Although this is a widely observed phenomenon, previous studies focused only on lotic habitats (e.g. riffles) rather than lentic habitats such as backwaters and isolated ponds (IP).Using a stable isotope three-source mixing model, we evaluated trophic contributions of reservoir-derived plankton, epilithon and terrestrial leaves to stream macroinvertebrates at four dam outlet reaches and two reference reaches in the Natori River catchment, Japan. We compared four different habitat types co-occurring within the reaches: lotic habitat (riffle and pool), bar-head (BH) lentic habitat, bar-tail (BT) lentic habitat (backwater) and isolated pond (IP) on sandy bars.The trophic contributions of reservoir-derived plankton were significantly lower in lentic habitats (BH, 15.4%; BT, 10.4%; IP, 9.1%) than in lotic habitats (mean, 27.7%). This was especially notable for filter feeders that feed on suspended fine particulate organic matter (SFPOM). The three-source model analysis indicated a lower biomass proportion of dam plankton in lentic SFPOM (mean, 21.2%) than in lotic SFPOM (mean, 35.6%). This difference in SFPOM composition was reflected in the lower trophic contribution of dam plankton to lentic filter feeders.The abundance ratio of filter feeders in the community was decreased in lentic habitats, while the abundance ratios of collector-gatherers, scrapers and shredders were increased. Macroinvertebrates in lentic habitats fed on sources less mixed with reservoir-derived plankton (e.g. benthic coarse particulate organic matter [BCPOM], benthic fine particulate organic matter [BFPOM] and epilithon); therefore, the trophic impact of reservoirs was indistinctive at the community level, indicating that lentic habitats can function as trophic refugia to mitigate the trophic impact of reservoirs.Because lentic habitats were decreased in area (accounting for 5.7% of average total area) in the downstream reaches of dams due to riverbed degradation, lentic habitats must be created in order to restore the trophic impact of reservoirs in river ecosystems.