The Correlation Between Negative Nerve Root Sedimentation Sign and Gravity: A Study of Upright Lumbar Multi-Positional Magnetic Resonance Images

Study Design: Retrospective upright MRI study. Objective: To validate the presence of positive and negative nerve root sedimentation signs on multi-positional MRI in the upright position and explore the relationship between negative nerve root sedimentation and gravity. Methods: T2-weighted axial multi-positional images in the upright position at the intervertebral disc levels from L1–L2 to L4–L5 in 141 patients with non-specific low back pain were retrospectively assessed. A positive sedimentation sign was defined as the absence of nerve root sedimentation or the absence of dorsal conglomeration of nerve roots within the dural sac. A negative sedimentation sign was defined as nerve root sedimentation dorsally or dorso-laterally like a horseshoe. Intra-and inter-observer reliability was evaluated. The relationship between sedimentation sign and dural sac cross-sectional area (CSA), anterior-posterior (AP) diameter was also explored. Results: The kappa value of intra-observer reliability was 0.962 and inter-observer reliability was 0.925. Both positive and negative sedimentation signs did appear at all 4 lumbar levels, including L1/2, L2/3, L3/4 and L4/5. A positive sedimentation sign was associated with significantly decreased dural sac CSA and AP diameter at L2/3, L3/4 or L4/5 level when compared to negative sedimentation sign. Conclusions: Both negative and positive sedimentation signs appeared at the L1/2, L2/3, L3/4, and L4/5 levels on the upright MRI, which suggested that the presence of nerve roots sedimenting dorsally in patients may not be associated with gravity. Moreover, the current study supports that sedimentation signs on multi-positional MRI images could have the same diagnostic functions as on MRI images.

Classification of spondylolytic clefts in patients with spondylolysis or isthmic spondylolisthesis using positional MRI

Background Posterior instability is a pathologic movement occurring in the spondylolytic cleft. Purpose To present a new classification system for the evaluation of spondylolytic cleft by positional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and determine the prevalence of the different types. Material and Methods A total of 176 segments of the lumbar spine with spondylolysis or isthmic spondylolisthesis were examined using positional MRI. Scans were obtained in neutral sitting, flexion, and extension positions. No visible movement in the cleft was defined as type A, fluid displaced into the cleft as type BI, displacement of the flava ligaments at the level of the cleft as type BII, and intraspinal cysts arising from the spondylolytic cleft as type BIII. The movements were characterized by a radiologist and a neurosurgeon experienced in positional MRI. Clinical findings were correlated with the different types of instability. Results A high agreement was found between the two observers. In total, 131 segments were characterized as type A, six as type BI, 24 as type BII, and 10 as type BIII. In five segments, the type differed between the right and the left side. Two patients had a mixed type BI/II, another two patients had a mixed type BII/III, and one patient had a mixed type BI/III. Patients with type BII and BIII instabilities suffered more often from radicular symptoms compared to patients without any instability. Conclusion The presented classification might help to better understand and study changes encountered in the spondylolytic cleft in patients with spondylolysis and isthmic spondylolisthesis using positional MRI.