POTENSI PEMBANGUNAN MUSEUM ARAK DALAM MENYIAPKAN DESA TRI EKA BUANA MENJADI DESA WISATA

The biggest arak producer in Bali is precisely located in Tri Eka Buana Village, Sidemen District, Karangasem Regency, Bali Province. With the arak in the village of Tri Eka Buana which is one of the village head's references to advance the Tri Eka Buana Village by giving an idea in the form of a wine museum development which will later become a tourist attraction. The development of the wine museum aims to preserve cultural customs especially the process of making traditional wine and to examine the potential of the wine museum to become a new tourist destination that will affect the economy of the population in the village of Tri Eka Buana. Besides that, Tri Eka Buana Village also plans to make its village a tourist village. However, to get to the tourist village there are several problems, one of which is the lack of village funds that will be used as the construction of the arak museum. In order to achieve the construction of the wine museum in the village of Tri Eka Buana, we therefore help the village by making proposals for the submission of funds to be submitted to related parties which will later be used for the construction of the arak museum.Keywords: Arak Museum, Tourism Village

HERITAGE POLITICS AND MUSEUMS DURING JAPANESE OCCUPATION PERIOD, 1942-1945

Before the World War II, approximately 25 museums were already established in colonial Indonesia. At that time, most of the museums were built by the Europeans to serve their interests. However, when the Dutch capitulated to the Japanese military government, what had happened to the existing museums in Indonesia were slightly known. Therefore, this research examines the history of the museum development during the Japanese occupation period in Indonesia in 1942-1945. The data gathered for this archival study are through magazine and newspaper articles published during the Japanese occupation period as well as through the archives of Arsip Nasional Indonesia, Jakarta. This research discovered that, during the Japanese occupation period, museums were used by the Japanese military government as their tool for political propaganda. This research also found out that during the Japanese occupation, politics and museums were closely entangled. Therefore, this preliminary research is important because it illustrates the history of museum development in Indonesia during the unknown period. It was also revealed that existing museums during that time had a significant impact for the museum development after Indonesian independence.

Periodization of the history of museology (on the example of Saint Petersburg museums)

This article examines the little-studied problem of periodization of the history of museology. The author describes the existing approaches of various scholars towards periodization, conducts their critical analysis, and offers original concept. The recommended model of the development of museology is based on the criterion of evolution of state power in the country. The subject of this research is to determine the peculiarities of museum construction in Saint Petersburg (the emergence of new profile groups, changes of social functions, impact of government policy upon museology) during the imperial, Soviet and presidential periods. The proposed methodology does not repeat any of the previously proposed periodization, which defines the novelty of this work. The recommended periodization, first and foremost, would allow conducting comparative analysis of the history of museum construction in different regions, both horizontally – each period, and vertically – between the periods; secondly, it is universal tool for all researchers in solution of research tasks and problems of museology; thirdly, it provides broader regional coverage – for identification of specific, common to certain areas, processes of the development of museology, as well as for introduction of regional material into the overall trend of museum development in Russia.

Book Reviews

Joan H. Baldwin and Anne W. Ackerson. Women in the Museum: Lessons from the Workplace. New York: Routledge, 2017.Christina Kreps. Museums and Anthropology in the Age of Engagement. London: Routledge, 2020.Ken Gorbey. Te Papa to Berlin: The Making of Two Museums. Dunedin, New Zealand: Otago University Press, 2020.Inge Daniels. What Are Exhibitions For? An Anthropological Approach. London: Bloomsbury, 2019.Dario Gamboni. The Museum as Experience: An Email Odyssey through Artists’ and Collectors’ Museums. Turnhout, Belgium: Brepols.Yulia Karpova. Comradely Objects: Design and Material Culture in Soviet Russia, 1960s–80s. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2020.Gail Dexter Lord, Guan Qiang, An Laishun, and Javier Jimenez, eds. Museum Development in China: Understanding the Building Boom. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 2019.Philipp Schorch with Noelle M. K. Y. Kahanu, Sean Mallon, Cristián Moreno Pakarati, Mara Mulrooney, Nina Tonga and Ty P. Kāwika Tengan. Refocusing Ethnographic Museums through Oceanic Lenses. Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i Press, 2020.

Children’s Museum within the Cultural Space of Modern Metropolis

For a long time, children’s museum remained an object of research only within pedagogical studies. Such scholars as M. Yu. Yukhnevich and B. A. Stolyarov contributed greatly to the development of museum pedagogy. In this paper children’s museum is viewed through the lens of culturological approach. We provide a comparative historical analysis of the children’s museum development and attempt to define its meaning in contemporary society. Keywords: children’s museum, museum center, museum educational program, contemporary museum practices.