Grade retention and school entry age in Spain: a structural problem

Grade retention has been the focus of the education debate in Spain for decades. On average, more than 30% of students have repeated at least one grade before they finish (or dropout from) their compulsory studies. The present research provides new evidence on this issue by investigating the influence of Spain’s school entry age upon students’ grade retention. Using data from 15-year-old students who participated in the PISA 2006, 2009, 2012 and 2015 assessments, we implement a regression discontinuity analysis. Our key finding is that students who were born late in the year (younger students) are more likely to repeat a grade. Yet, once they reach secondary education, the disadvantage they suffer due to their younger school starting age seems to disappear. Hence, the key reason why younger students have lower PISA scores than older students in Spain is due to their increased likelihood of repeating a grade, rather than being due to their relative age per se. To avoid these artificial disadvantages of younger students and unfair retention, we suggest that policymakers inform families about this school entry issue and also make the school entry law more flexible. This would facilitate parents of younger children to choose whether to delay their children’s school enrolment or not.

The distribution of tuberculin reaction among children at school entry in Madaba, Jordan

The present study reports the results of a tuberculin test survey of a representative sample of BCG unvaccinated children at school entry age in the Madaba district in Jordan in 1991-92. Preschool household contacts of positive schoolchildren and a 5% random sample of negative schoolchildren were also screened by the same test. Three out of the 746 children screened by the initial school survey were found to be positive giving a prevalence rate of 0.4%. The overall prevalence rate of infection among preschool contacts was found to be 10.1% [28.6% among the contacts of the positive schoolchildren compared to 8.1% among contacts of the negative children]

The effect of lowering school entry age on attention deficit hyperactivity disorder diagnosis

The school entry age was changed from 72 to 66 months in 2012 with a new education system adjustment in Turkey. The aim of the study was to investigate the effects of lowering school entry age on Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) diagnosis and symptom severity. The records of children at first and second grade diagnosed with ADHD according to the DSM-IV diagnostic criteria in the Child Psychiatry outpatient clinic between January and July 2010 (when the old system was in use) and between January-July 2013 (when the new system was in use) were retrospectively screened to create the old-system and new system groups. Among the two groups, T-DSM-IV-S fulfilled by parents and teachers were used to assess symptom severity. The frequency of ADHD and ADHD predominantly inattentive subtype diagnosis we found to be significantly higher among the girls in the new system compared to old system (25.8%, 8.9%, p=0.027 - 56.3%, 0%, p=0.012). Additionally, mother’s subscale scores of T-DSM-IV-S were lower among the children in the new system compared to the ones in the old system. By lowering school entry age due to the new education system, frequency of ADHD diagnosis increased while symptom severity rates decreased among the first-grade girls. Thus, it may be suggested that despite decreased symptom severity, the girls who started school with the new system were diagnosed with ADHD more frequently due to a marked disruption in academic, social, and behavioral functionality associated with insufficient neurodevelopmental maturity.

Starting school: educational development as a function of age of entry and prematurity

ObjectiveTo estimate the impact on early development of prematurity and summer birth and the potential ‘double disadvantage’ created by starting school a year earlier than anticipated during pregnancy, due to being born preterm.Design, setting and patientsWe investigated the impact of gestational and school-entry age on the likelihood of failing to achieve a ‘Good Level of Development’ (GLD) on the Early Years Foundation Stage Profile in 5-year-old children born moderate-to-late preterm using data from the Born in Bradford longitudinal birth cohort. We used hierarchical logistic regression to control for chronological maturity, and perinatal and socioeconomic factors.ResultsGestational age and school-entry age were significant predictors of attaining a GLD in the 10 337 children who entered school in the correct academic year given their estimated date of delivery. The odds of not attaining a GLD increased by 1.09 (95% CI 1.06 to 1.11) for each successive week born early and by 1.17 for each month younger within the year group (95% CI 1.16 to 1.18). There was no interaction between these two effects. Children starting school a year earlier than anticipated during pregnancy were less likely to achieve a GLD compared with (1) other children born preterm (fully adjusted OR 5.51 (2.85–14.25)); (2) term summer births (3.02 (1.49–6.79)); and (3) preterm summer births who remained within their anticipated school-entry year (3.64 (1.27–11.48)).ConclusionsThese results confirm the developmental risks faced by children born moderate-to-late preterm, and—for the first time—illustrate the increased risk associated with ‘double disadvantage’.