infectious disease consultation
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

51
(FIVE YEARS 18)

H-INDEX

14
(FIVE YEARS 4)

Author(s):  
Takayuki Okura ◽  
Kentaro Iwata ◽  
Taiji Koyama ◽  
Kei Ebisawa ◽  
Yu Arakawa ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S421-S422
Author(s):  
Takaaki Kobayashi ◽  
Alexandre Marra ◽  
Marin L Schweizer ◽  
Patrick Ten Eyck ◽  
Chaorong Wu ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Morbidity and mortality from candidemia remain unacceptably high. While infectious disease consultation (IDC) is known to lower the mortality from Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia, little is known on the impact of IDC in candidemia. Methods We conducted a retrospective observational cohort study of candidemia patients at a large tertiary care hospital between 2015 and 2019. All patients aged ≥18 years with blood cultures positive for Candida species were included. We only included the first episode of candidemia. Exclusion criteria were death or transfer to the palliative care unit within 48 hours from the time cultures became positive. The crude mortality rate was compared between those with IDC and without IDC. Then, we systematically searched five publication-databases through February 2020 and performed a meta-analysis of the impact of IDC on mortality of patients with candidemia. The study protocol has been submitted to the International Prospective Register for Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) database (ID 156939) on April 2020. Results A total of 151 patients at our institution met the inclusion criteria, 129 (85%) of whom received IDC. Thirty-day, and 90-day mortality rates were significantly lower in the IDC group (18% vs 50%, P = .002; 23% vs 50%, P = .0022, respectively). Our systematic literature review returned 216 reports, of which, 13 studies including ours fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Among the 13 studies with a total 3687 patients, IDC was performed in 49% of patients. Mortality numbers were available in 10 studies. Overall mortality was 38.2% with a significant difference in favor of the IDC group (28.4% and 47.6%) with a pooled relative risk of 0.41 [95% Cl 0.35-0.49]. Ophthalmology referral (61%; 790/1279 and 21%; 273/1304, P < 0.001), echocardiogram (54%; 662/1219 and 28%; 369/1296, P < 0.001), and central line removal (78%; 830/1069 and 61%; 686/1116, P < 0.02) were performed more frequently among patients receiving IDC. Overall mortality Conclusion This study is the first systematic literature review and meta-analysis to evaluate the association between IDC and candidemia mortality. IDC was associated with a lower mortality and should be standard of care in all patients with candidemia. Disclosures Dimitrios Farmakiotis, MD, Astellas (Grant/Research Support) Paul Auwaerter, Collidion (Consultant)DiaSorin (Consultant)Johnson and Johnson (Shareholder)MicroB-Plex (Research Grant or Support)Shionogi (Consultant) Daniel Diekema, bioMerieux, Inc (Grant/Research Support)JMI Laboratories (Consultant)


2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (9) ◽  
Author(s):  
Takaaki Kobayashi ◽  
Alexandre R Marra ◽  
Marin L Schweizer ◽  
Patrick Ten Eyck ◽  
Chaorong Wu ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Morbidity and mortality from candidemia remain unacceptably high. While infectious disease consultation (IDC) is known to lower the mortality from Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia, little is known about the impact of IDC in candidemia. Methods We conducted a retrospective observational cohort study of candidemia patients at a large tertiary care hospital between 2015 and 2019. The crude mortality rate was compared between those with IDC and without IDC. Then, we systematically searched 5 databases through February 2020 and performed a meta-analysis of the impact of IDC on the mortality of patients with candidemia. Results A total of 151 patients met the inclusion criteria, 129 (85%) of whom received IDC. Thirty-day and 90-day mortality rates were significantly lower in the IDC group (18% vs 50%; P = .002; 23% vs 50%; P = .0022, respectively). A systematic literature review returned 216 reports, of which 13 studies including the present report fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Among the 13 studies with a total of 3582 patients, IDC was performed in 50% of patients. Overall mortality was 38.2% with a significant difference in favor of the IDC group (28.4% vs 47.6%), with a pooled relative risk of 0.41 (95% CI, 0.35–0.49). Ophthalmology referral, echocardiogram, and central line removal were performed more frequently among patients receiving IDC. Conclusions This study is the first systematic literature review and meta-analysis to evaluate the association between IDC and candidemia mortality. IDC was associated with significantly lower mortality and should be considered in all patients with candidemia.


Infection ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 48 (2) ◽  
pp. 275-284 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arno Mohr ◽  
Michaela Simon ◽  
Tobias Joha ◽  
Frank Hanses ◽  
Bernd Salzberger ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 164
Author(s):  
Russell E Lewis ◽  
Dimitrios P Kontoyiannis

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 165-166
Author(s):  
Carlos Mejia-Chew ◽  
Jane A O'Halloran ◽  
Margaret A Olsen ◽  
Dustin Stwalley ◽  
Amber Salter ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 164-165 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jerome Lambert ◽  
Maja von Cube ◽  
Lucie Biard ◽  
Siegbert Rieg ◽  
Martin Wolkewitz

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Supavit Chesdachai ◽  
Susan Kline ◽  
Derrek Helmin ◽  
Radha Rajasingham

Abstract We evaluated the association between infectious disease consultation and bloodstream infection outcomes, including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, Candida, and Pseudomonas. No infectious diseases consultation was associated with over 4-fold increased hazard of death at 3 months and 6-fold increased hazard of death in hospital.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document