Belief in science is a term applied to assess the degree to which individuals see science as a positive and moral force. This allegiance to science as a guide for societal progress changes on a cultural level over time, with there being a particularly strong contrast between the widespread distrust of science in modern times and the ‘Golden Age of Futurism’ that contextualized Milgram’s infamous obedience experiments. Milgram’s experiments have been critically analyzed for their methods and conclusions, and although many factors have been proposed as possible contributors, society’s relationship with science during that era is largely overlooked. This presentation applies belief in science as a likely contributing factor in Milgram’s experiments through two primary routes: 1) the experiments took place during a timeframe characterized by a rich embracing of science through major innovations, portrayals in popular media, and celebrity scientists, and 2) the use of belief in science as a prime in a multitude of ways, including legitimizing the experiment with a scientific textbook and by advertising Yale University as the location of the experiments. Belief in science should be considered among contributing factors in discussing Milgram’s outcome, as it could contribute to obedience through an appeal to scientific progress, calling further into question Milgram’s wartime atrocity applications, and offers an additional reason as to why the obedience experiments would inevitably differ in a modern context.