Crops production on the Peru’s highland is carried out under the traditional agriculture’s practices of, degrading natural resources. Contrary, conservation agriculture’s practices are less tedious and conservationist to natural resources. A field experiment with corn crop was set up to compare the two agricultural systems, evaluating bulk density, volumetric humidity, earthworm population, soil erosion, corn ear yield, and economic utility. An LSD test was designed to assess bulk density, volumetric humidity, earthworm population, and corn yield, with 20 replications each one. Additionally, a completely randomized design was established to assess erosion, with three replications of 50 erosion pins. In conservation agriculture’ssoil erosion was significantly reduced; volumetric humidity, earthworm population, and yield were significantly higher in conservation agriculture. The results showed that conservation agriculture’s practices are more profitable and friendly to natural resources than traditional agriculture’s practices. Keywords: bulk density, corn yield, erosion, earthworm population, volumetric humidity