double lumen catheter
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

118
(FIVE YEARS 23)

H-INDEX

14
(FIVE YEARS 1)

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 1292-1299
Author(s):  
Muhammad Iqbal ◽  
Raflis Rustam ◽  
Vendry Rivaldy

Background. Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a terminal disease requiring hemodialysis. Hemodialysis requires vascular access using a double lumen catheter (DLC). However, the use of DLC may increase complications mainly infection, either infection of exit site or bloodstream. This study is aimed to seek risk factors contributing to the incidence of central catheter-related infections in CKD patients with DLC undergoing HD at Dr. M. Djamil Hospital, Padang. Methods. This study is a prospective study on patients undergoing HD at Dr. M. Djamil Hospital, Padang. This study using consecutive sampling technique. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 25.0. Results. This study involved 40 CKD patients undergoing HD. Majority of the samples had bloodstream infections (67.5%). Clinical manifestations of purulent secretion, duration of catheter used, and hypoalbuminemia had significant differences in the incidence of DLC infection based on bloodstream infection and exit site infection (p<0.05). The most common bacterial found was Pseudomonas aeruginosa (22.5%) which was sensitive to ceftazidime, cefepime, meropenem, amikacin, gentamicin, ciprofloxacin. Conclusion. Factors contributing to the incidence of DLC-related infections at Dr. M. Djamil Hospital are duration of catheter use and hypoalbuminemia. Pseudomonas aeruginosa is the most common cause of DLC-related infections.


2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (8) ◽  
pp. 2134-2136
Author(s):  
Abid Hussain ◽  
Mazhar Hussain ◽  
Javed Iqbal ◽  
Rabia Saeed

Background: Conventional Heparin and Tri-sodium citrate 4% are used for locking double lumen catheter after dialysis to prevent line thrombosis. Objectives: To compare the line thrombosis after use of heparin and tri-sodium citrate 4%. Methodology: Randomized controlled trial study involving patient who develop line thrombosis after use of heparin and tri-sodium citrate 4% from February 2020 to August 2020. The study was done on a group of 200 patients who had poor blood flow in double lumen catheter during dialysis. After informed consent first detailed clinical history was taken from patient. Inclusion criteria waspatient of age 14 year of above either gender who presented with renal failure, whom dialysis was performed via temporary catheter or permanent catheter. Conventional heparin and tri-sodium citrate are used as line blocking agents and line thrombosis was observed in patients. The data was entered and analyzed SPSS 20. Results: During this research work 200 double lumen were paced in patients. Out of these, in 100 patients heparin was used as locking solution and locking period was 45-60 days. In remaining 100 patients tri-sodium citrate was used as locking solution in the locking period was 45-60 days. There was no difference in patient’s comorbid conditions in both groups of the patients (Figure1). The catheter change rate was greater in patients whose catheter were locked with heparin (52 patients) as compared to tri-sodium citrate (42 patients). The proportion of the patient who needs replacement of the double lumen were 81% in conventional heparin sulphate and 65% with 4% tri-sodium citrate groups. There was longer insertion time for requiring double lumen for line thrombosis related poor blood flow in patients in which 4% tri-sodium citrate were used for catheter locked with comparison to the group in which heparin sulphate were used for locking (Figure2). The average hospitalization for line related thrombosis was longer in heparin group (10.5 days) as compared to citrate group 3.2 days. (P=0.02) The hospitalization rate was 6% in heparin group as compared to 2.5% in tri-sodium citrate group (P=045%). Conclusion: Tri-sodium citrate 4% is equally effective cheap and beneficial with comparison to heparin sulphate. It showed good outcome as far as change of double lumen or double lumen related infection or hospital admission when compared with heparin sulphate. Randomized trials while using tri-sodium citrate with other anti-coagulant would definitely will decide the better double lumen catheter locking agent. Key Words: End stage kidney failure, Advanced renal disease, Dialysis, double lumen blood flow.


2021 ◽  
Vol 71 (4) ◽  
pp. 1161-66
Author(s):  
Mehmood Hussain ◽  
Malik Nadeem Azam Khan ◽  
Khalid Rehman ◽  
Irfan Ali Mirza ◽  
Maryam Rehman ◽  
...  

Objective: To assess Bacterial spectrum and antimicrobial pattern of Blood Stream Infections associated with non-tunneled double lumen catheter in hemodialysis patients. Study Design: Prospective observational study. Place and Duration of Study: Department of Nephrology, Pakistan Emirates Military Hospital Rawalpindi Pakistan; Armed Forces Institute of Pathology Rawalpindi, Pakistan, from May 2019 to Apr 2020. Methodology: A total of 753 patients underwent placement of non-tunneled double lumen catheter (457 femoral, 296 Internal Jugular). Patients with clinically suspected bloodstream infections had their catheters removed with tips being sent for culture along with 2 sets of peripheral blood cultures. Patients were labelled as having bloodstream infection if growth of organism was detected in catheter tip and at least one peripheral blood culture. Susceptibility testing was done for available antimicrobials. Results: One hundred and thirty six (18.06%) incidences or 5.48 bloodstream infections per 1000 catheter days, with confirmed growth on blood cultures were identified. Gram positive infections were seen in 76 (55.88%) individuals with most common organism being coagulase-negative Staphylococcus (28.68%), followed by Staphylococcus aureus (21.32%). These organisms had low resistance rates to Vancomycin (0%), Tigecycline (0%), Doxycycline (6.6%) and Linezolid (9.5%). Gram negative infections were seen in 60 (44.11%) patients with Klebsiella pneumoniae (13.24%) being the most commonly identified pathogen followed by Acinetobacter baumannii (12.50%) and had relatively higher degree of antimicrobial resistance. Conclusion: Gram positive organisms were the most common cause of bloodstream infection in this study and were found susceptible to vancomycin and doxycycline whereas gram-negative organisms had high rates of antimicrobial......


Medicinus ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 111
Author(s):  
Margaret Merlyn Tjiang ◽  
Dimas Arsana Prayoga

<p><strong>Background: </strong>Central venous catheters (CVCs) are frequently used in patients for several indications such as cancer treatment, diagnostic monitoring, parenteral nutrition, hemodialysis, and administration of fluids, blood products or medication. Double lumen catheter induced CVCs thrombosis has not been paid into proper attention in developing countries such as Indonesia.</p><p><strong>Aims:</strong> The aim of this study is to identify the incidence and characteristic of double lumen catheter induced CVCs thrombosis in patients undergoing hemodialysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This systematic review has been registered in PROSPERO (CRD42020181584). A systematic search of literature for observational and randomized controlled trial was conducted in PubMed, PubMed central, and Google Scholar through April 16, 2020. Two reviewers independently searched and selected. The risk of bias was evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality assessment tool.<strong> </strong></p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 408 patients were included in our study. There were 192 (47.1%) male patients. The double lumen catheter was mostly placed in the jugular vein (60%), followed by subclavian vein (25%) and femoral vein (15%). Four (1.1%) patients had deep vein thrombosis after about one month of double lumen catheter placement. All these four patients, the double lumen catheter was inserted in the femoral vein. Any other significant risk factors for thrombosis other than double lumen catheter insertion not found. Out of these four patients, one of them passed away. All patients were treated using heparin.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The incidence of double lumen catheter induced thrombosis is low (1.1%) in patients undergoing hemodialysis. However, further larger study is needed to confirm and find the associating factors.</p>


Endoscopy ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mamoru Takenaka ◽  
Tomohiro Yamazaki ◽  
Yasuo Otsuka ◽  
Rei Ishikawa ◽  
Masatoshi Kudo

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 95-101
Author(s):  
Riris Andriati ◽  
Dewi Fitriani ◽  
Liza Puspa Dewi ◽  
Yuliastuti Yuliastuti

Determinants of double lumen catheter reimplantation in patients with chronic kidney diseaseBackground: Double Lumen catheter is a sterile tube that is inserted into a large central vein such as the jugular vein, subclavian vein or femoral vein through a surgical procedure. Failure of hemodialysis due to positional dysfunction and double lumen catheter infection must be reimplanted so that the hemodialysis continues on schedule.Purpose: To determine the relationship of factors that affect reattachment of the double lumen catheter in patients with chronic renal failure in BSD Medika Hospital.Method: A descriptive quantitative analytic with cross sectional design. Subjects were chronic kidney disease patients who performed regular hemodialysis through double lumen hemodialysis catheter access. Risk factor variables (age, sex, hypertension, DM, history of infection, location of insertion, duration of use, history of previous double lumen catheter placement). The research sample was 32 respondents.Results: Bivariat results, age (p = 0.637); gender (p = 1.000); status of hypertension (p = 0.338); status of infection (p = 0.138); status of Diabetes Mellitus (p = 0.053); insertion location (p = 0.052); duration of use (p= 0.004).Conclusion: There is a significant correlation between duration of use and reimplantation of double lumen catheter in patients with chronic kidney disease.Keywords: Double lumen catheter; Reimplantation; Patients; Chronic kidney diseasePendahuluan: Double lumen catheter adalah suatu selang steril yang dimasukan kedalam vena sentral besar seperti vena jugularis, vena subklavia atau vena femoralis melalui prosedur operasi. Kegagalan hemodialisa yang dikarenakan disfungsi posisi dan infeksi double lumen catheter maka harus dilakukan pemasangan ulang kateter agar hemodialisa tetap dilaksanakan sesuai jadwal.Tujuan: Mengetahui adanya hubungan faktor-faktor yang memengaruhi pemasangan ulang double lumen catheter pada pasien penyakit ginjal kronik di RS Medika BSD.Metode: Penelitian deskriptif analitik kuantitatif dengan desain cross sectional. Variabel yang digunakan adalah usia, jenis kelamin, riwayat hipertensi, riwayat DM, riwayat infeksi, lokasi insersi, lama penggunaan, dan riwayat pemasangan double lumen catheter sebelumnya. Subyek penelitian adalah pasien dengan penyakit ginjal kronis yang dilakukan hemodialisis reguler melalui akses vaskular kateter hemodialisis double lumen. Sampel penelitian sebesar 32 responden.Hasil: bivariat analisis menunjukkan hasil: usia (p=0.637); jenis kelamin (p=1.000); riwayat hipertensi (p=0.338); riwayat infeksi (p=0.138); riwayat DM (p=0.053); lokasi insersi (p=0.052); dan lama penggunaan (p=0.004).Simpulan: Lama penggunaan berhubungan signitifikan dengan pemasangan ulang catheter double lumen pada pasien gagal ginjal kronik di RS Medika BSD Kota Tangerang Selatan.


Author(s):  
AA.Gde Agung Anom Arie Wiradana ◽  
I Gusti Agung Bagus Krisna Wibawa ◽  
Ida Bagus Budiarta

Background: Infection is one of complication of vascular access that can lead a higher morbidity, loss of access, and even mortality. Hospitalized hemodialysis patients with double lumen catheter (DLC) have a two to three higher risk for infection and death compared to patients with arteriovenous graft. The aim of this study was to determine the infection rate in dialysis double lumen catheter and its characteristic. Method: A retrospective study was conducted in Sanglah General Hospital. Inclusion criteria was patients aged ≥18 years old who required DLC for hemodialysis access during April 2017 to March 2018. Exclusion criteria were patients without blood culture result and incomplete medical report. Data presented in a demographic data, including microbial pattern of bloodstream culture. Result: Among 42 patients who was diagnosed with bacteremia (41.2%), 57% were male, and mostly using non-tunneled DLC. Coagulase-negative Staphylococci (23.8%) was the commonest pathogen of infected DLC, followed by Staphylococcus aureus (9.5%) and Staphylococcus epidermidis (7.1%). Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumanni, and nosocomial pathogen was counted for 4,8 %. Conclusion: Infection rate in DLC among hemodialysis patients of Sanglah General Hospital was 28.6% with the most common etiology was Coagulase-negative Staphylococci (23.8%).


2020 ◽  
Vol 97 (1) ◽  
pp. 50-53
Author(s):  
Katsunori Sekine ◽  
Toyokazu Yagi ◽  
Ryo Watanabe ◽  
Tomoyuki Yada ◽  
Naomi Uemura

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 80-93
Author(s):  
Kemas Muhammad Dahlan ◽  
Wahyu Sholekhuddin ◽  
Fahmi Jaka Yusuf

Abstract Hemodialysis has been accepted as a method of treatment in patients with CKD in stage 5. A-V fistula is the closest ideal hemodialysis vascular access, so that it can reduce morbidity and mortality of CKD patients. This research is a retrospective descriptive study with data obtained from the A-V fistula surgery form archive in the Vascular and Endovascular Division of the Department of Surgery, FK UNSRI in January 2018-December 2018 and from the patient's medical record. Data processing was carried out with SPSS 16.0. The results of the study obtained 203 patient data with the use of AV Shunt that met the inclusion criteria. The mean age of patients was 50.53 years. There were 114 (56%) male patients and 89 (44%) female patients. Risk factors such as smoking were found in 9 (4%) patients. History of the disease prior to experiencing chronic renal failure was hypertension in 115 patients (56.6%) and diabetes in 81 (40%). There were 69 patient’s Hb data before AV shunt with Hb <7 (1%) in 2 people, 7-8.9 (33%) 67 people, 9-10.9 (53%) 108 people,> 11 (13%) 26 people. 128 (63%) patients had double lumen catheters installed in the right jugular, 5 (2%) patients were placed in the left jugular, and 70 (34%) patients did not have a double lumen catheter. A total of 169 (83%) patients had a history of using AV Shunt. There were 71 (35%) patients with the wrist region anastomosis, 132 (65%) patients with cubiti region anastomosis. Native AV shunt was the most commonly performed in 202 (99.5%) patients. There were no recorded complications after AV Shunt placement in 99 (48.8%) patients, 51 (25.2%) patients had AVF branches, 23 (11.3%) had AV Shunt rupture, 18 (8.8%) AVF stenosis, 1 (0.5%) central stenosis, 1 (0.5%) thrombus, and 11 (5.4%) infections. A total of 167 (82.2%) patients took AV Shunt after 3 months.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document