choice reaction task
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

49
(FIVE YEARS 4)

H-INDEX

13
(FIVE YEARS 1)

Author(s):  
Marc Dalecki ◽  
Fabian Steinberg ◽  
Rainer Beurskens

Objective Investigating dual-task (DT) performance during simulated weightlessness by water submersion, using a manual tracking and a choice reaction task. In contrast to previous work, we focus on performance changes over time. Background Previous research showed motor tracking and choice reaction impairments under DT and single-task (ST) conditions in shallow water submersion. Recent research analyzed performance as average across task time, neglecting potential time-related changes or fluctuations of task-performance. Method An unstable tracking and a choice reaction task was performed for one minute under ST and DT conditions in 5 m water submersion and on dry land in 43 participants. Tracking and choice reaction time performance for both tasks were analyzed in blocks of 10 seconds. Results Tracking performance deteriorated underwater compared to dry land conditions during the second half while performing one minute in DT conditions. Choice reaction time increased underwater as well, but independent of task time and type. Conclusion Tracking error increased over time when performing unstable tracking and choice reaction together. Potentially, physiological and psychological alterations under shallow submersion further strain the human system during DT operations, exceeding available recourse capacities such that DT performance deteriorated over time. Application Humans operating in simulated weightlessness underwater should be aware of substantial performance declines that can occur within a short amount of time during DT situations that include continuous tracking.


2020 ◽  
Vol 80 (1) ◽  
pp. 76-89 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sergei A. Schapkin ◽  
Jonas Raggatz ◽  
Markus Hillmert ◽  
Irina Böckelmann

2017 ◽  
Vol 23 (8) ◽  
pp. 665-674 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher Tolleson ◽  
Maxim Turchan ◽  
Nelleke van Wouwe ◽  
David Isaacs ◽  
Fenna Phibbs ◽  
...  

AbstractObjectives: In unpredictable situations, individuals often show tradeoffs between response initiation and inhibition speeds. We tested the hypothesis that Parkinson’s disease (PD) motor subtypes differentially impact tradeoffs between these two action-oriented processes. We predicted that, compared to tremor dominant (TD) patients, predominant postural instability and gait dysfunction (PIGD) patients would show exacerbated tradeoffs between response initiation and inhibition in situations requiring the sudden potential need to interrupt an action. Methods: Fifty-one PD patients (subdivided into PIGD [n=27] and TD [n=24]) and 21 healthy controls (HCs) completed a choice reaction task to establish baseline response initiation speed between groups. Subsequently, participants completed a stop-signal task which introduced an occasional, unpredictable stop stimulus. We measured changes in initiation speed in preparation of an unpredictable stop (i.e., proactive slowing) and inhibition latency (i.e., stop-signal reaction time). Results: Compared to HCs, PD patients showed slower response initiation speeds in the choice reaction task. All groups showed proactive slowing in the stop-signal task but the magnitude was considerably larger in PIGD patients, almost twice as large as TD patients. PD patients, irrespective of motor subtype, showed longer inhibition latencies than HCs. Conclusions: PIGD and TD subtypes both showed exacerbated response inhibition deficits. However, PIGD patients showed much more pronounced proactive slowing in situations with an expected yet unpredictable need to stop action abruptly. This suggests that PIGD is accompanied by exaggerated tradeoffs between response initiation and inhibition processes to meet situational action demands. We discuss putative neural mechanisms and clinical implications of these findings. (JINS, 2017, 23, 665–674)


2011 ◽  
Vol 71 ◽  
pp. e242-e243
Author(s):  
Yoshifumi Tanaka ◽  
Kozo Funase ◽  
Hiroshi Sekiya ◽  
Joyo Sasaki ◽  
Yufu M. Tanaka

2011 ◽  
Vol 34 (1) ◽  
pp. 55-59 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masahiro Shinya ◽  
Osamu Wada ◽  
Minoru Yamada ◽  
Noriaki Ichihashi ◽  
Shingo Oda

2010 ◽  
Vol 261 (2) ◽  
pp. 111-120 ◽  
Author(s):  
Verena Mittermeier ◽  
Gregor Leicht ◽  
Susanne Karch ◽  
Ulrich Hegerl ◽  
Hans-Jürgen Möller ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document