streak artifact
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

39
(FIVE YEARS 3)

H-INDEX

9
(FIVE YEARS 1)

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 604-609
Author(s):  
A. Bhagyalakshmi ◽  
V. Vijaya Chamundeeswari

A streak artifact is an anomaly seen in the CT image of the brain. It is like a dark bands or streaks appearing in an image that is not present in the original region. The appearance of these artifacts leads to misinterpretation of medical diagnosis. Under sampling, photon starvation, motion and beam hardening are some of the reasons for occurrence of streak artifacts. These type of artifacts commonly occur in the posterior fossa of the brain. This paper mainly focuses on region shape and texture identification and removal of streak artifacts exists in the brain image. Initially morphological operators and fuzzy k-means algorithms are used to identify the different regions in the CT brain image. Each region is treated as a single image and features are extracted for each image. The feature descriptors are constructed using region properties and statistical features. The extracted features are compared with threshold brain image to identify the dark bands of streak artifacts.


2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (9) ◽  
pp. 4803 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chuangjian Cai ◽  
Xuanhao Wang ◽  
Ke Si ◽  
Jun Qian ◽  
Jianwen Luo ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 81 (6) ◽  
pp. 3915-3923 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sagar Mandava ◽  
Mahesh B. Keerthivasan ◽  
Diego R. Martin ◽  
Maria I. Altbach ◽  
Ali Bilgin

2018 ◽  
Vol 74 (4) ◽  
pp. 315-325 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ken Takada ◽  
Katsuhiro Ichikawa ◽  
Shinnya Banno ◽  
Katsuhiko Otobe

2017 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 88-92
Author(s):  
Ryan Verity ◽  
David Leswick ◽  
Brent Burbridge ◽  
Rhonda Bryce ◽  
Hyun Lim

Abstract Background: The safety of power-injectable implanted arm ports is well established, but there is insufficient data to conclude that image quality of computed tomography resulting from contrast introduced via the port is of equal quality to images derived from contrast introduced via traditional peripheral access. The objective of this study was to determine whether the image quality of computed tomography pulmonary embolism and computed tomography aorta studies would differ when injecting contrast via an implanted arm port vs a peripheral intravenous site. We hypothesized that injecting via an implanted arm port would produce better-quality images, the result of more appropriate timing and less streak artifact. Methods: Scans from a provincial database search for patients who underwent a computed tomography pulmonary embolism or aorta study with contrast injection via the implanted arm port and thin section images available, were reviewed (pulmonary embolism studies n = 3, aorta studies n = 3). Only a limited number of patients were available for review because there are currently few patients with these ports in place and we limited evaluation to thin section images. Comparison was made with 6 control patients who did not have a port and had received a peripheral arm intravenous contrast injection for these study types. Objective measurements included signal-to-noise ratio and contrast-to-noise ratio of the pulmonary arteries (4 sites) and aorta (2 sites) as appropriate for scan type. Subjective analysis of image quality was performed by 2 radiologists. Results: Although sample size was limited, the implanted arm port group had similar or higher mean signal-to-noise ratio and contrast-to-noise ratio values at all sites. Subjective assessments showed the implanted arm port group to have similar or better opacification and diagnostic confidence; similar or less streak artifact was also observed at each of the sites. Conclusions: These exploratory results suggest that studies with implanted arm port injection can generate high-quality images on both objective and subjective assessment, similar to, or possibly better than, images generated from usual peripheral intravenous access for contrast injection.


2017 ◽  
Vol 58 (9) ◽  
pp. 1085-1093 ◽  
Author(s):  
Koichiro Yasaka ◽  
Toshihiro Furuta ◽  
Takatoshi Kubo ◽  
Eriko Maeda ◽  
Masaki Katsura ◽  
...  

Background Abdominal computed tomography (CT) without arm elevation is associated with degraded image quality due to streak artifacts. Purpose To compare the degree of streak artifacts in abdominal CT images without arm elevation between full iterative reconstruction (IR), hybrid IR, and filtered back projection (FBP) using two commercially available scanners. Material and Methods First, a phantom study simulating CT examination without arm elevation was performed. Second, unenhanced axial images of 33 patients (17 and 16 patients for each vendor) who underwent CT without arm elevation were reconstructed with full IR, hybrid IR and FBP. A radiologist placed 50 parallel lines with lengths of 50 pixels vertical to the streaks and quantitatively evaluated the images for streak artifacts in the phantom study. Two radiologists evaluated the images of patients for streak artifacts (on the liver and the kidney) and diagnostic acceptability using a four-point scale. Results The phantom study indicated that full IR algorithms were more effective than FBP in reducing streak artifacts. In the clinical patient study, streak artifacts were significantly more reduced with full IR compared with FBP in both the liver and kidney ( P < 0.012). Streak artifact reduction was limited with hybrid IR. Model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR) (one of the full IR algorithms) provided diagnostically more acceptable image quality ( P < 0.016) compared with FBP. Conclusion In abdominal CT without arm elevation, full IR enabled a more efficient streak artifact reduction compared with FBP and MBIR was associated with diagnostically more acceptable images.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document