sieve mesh size
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

22
(FIVE YEARS 1)

H-INDEX

7
(FIVE YEARS 0)

Wetlands ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 38 (4) ◽  
pp. 677-687
Author(s):  
Ryan C. Baldwin ◽  
Michael D. Sundberg ◽  
Timothy W. Stewart ◽  
Michael J. Weber

2017 ◽  
Vol 58 (1) ◽  
pp. 25-40
Author(s):  
Krešimir Markulin ◽  
Vlasta Ćosović

Study of planktonic foraminifera, sampled from two levels of a 26 cm thick core, recovered at 1,200 m water depth, sheds some lights on the composition of foraminiferal assemblages that occur in the Southern Adriatic. Altogether 15 planktonic species (including one referred as undeterminable and two species recorded for the first time in the eastern Adriatic Sea) identified from 0-2 cm and 24-26 cm sediment intervals, were grouped into two assemblages: >63 μm fraction Turborotalita quinqueloba and >125 μm fraction as Globigerina bulloides-Globigerinoides ruber. The differences in core-top and core-bottom assemblages lie in: a) change in the relative proportion of some species; and b) slight differences in diversity indices. The relative proportions of species are strongly controlled by sieve mesh size, whereas the slight increase in diversity follows the increase in sieve mesh size. The benthic foraminifera, although constituting a negligible quantitative factor, show a slight increase in abundance and diversity of species with age.


2015 ◽  
Vol 103 (1) ◽  
pp. 59-68 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Gichimu Mbaka ◽  
Charles Mwithali M'Erimba ◽  
Henry Karanja Thiongo ◽  
Jude Mutuku Mathooko

2013 ◽  
Vol 93 (6) ◽  
pp. 1441-1456 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ana Paula Maria Cavalcanti Valença ◽  
Paulo Jorge Parreira dos Santos

Macrobenthic data from estuaries along the Pernambuco coast in north-eastern Brazil were analysed to evaluate the effect of sieve mesh size (1.0 mm × 0.5 mm) and sampling depth (0–10 cm × 0–20 cm) on the description of infaunal communities, in an attempt to discuss standardized sampling procedures for different ecological studies objectives in these ecosystems. In general, the difference in sieve retention was less evident for biomass but was important for abundance: the 1.0 mm sieve retained only 27% of total individuals but 77% of total biomass. Regarding sampling depth, the 0–10 cm layer contained most individuals (94%) but contributed just 64% of the overall biomass. Although no strong differences in community structure were observed at most sites with the use of different sieves, the correlations among community dissimilarity using different meshes with environmental parameters (organic matter, total-N and microphytobenthos) indicated that the use of the 0.5 mm sieve will allow a better evaluation of the status of these estuaries. The results also highlight the importance of taking the vertical distribution of tropical macrofauna into account for quantitative estimates: for taxa composition and abundance the top layer is clearly essential, whereas for biomass the deeper layers should also be considered.


Limnetica ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 211-220
Author(s):  
Beatriz Barba ◽  
Aitor Larrañaga ◽  
Ainhoa Otermin ◽  
Ana Basaguren ◽  
Jesús Pozo

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document