High-Resolution, Multidimensional Phylogenetic Metrics Identify Class I Aminoacyl-tRNA Synthetase Evolutionary Mosaicity and Inter-modular Coupling

The provenance of the aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (aaRS) poses challenging questions because of their role in the emergence and evolution of genetic coding. We investigate evidence about their ancestry from curated structure-based multiple sequence alignments of a structurally invariant “scaffold” shared by all 10 canonical Class I aaRS. Three uncorrelated phylogenetic metrics—residue-by-residue conservation, its variance, and row-by-row cladistic congruence—imply that the Class I scaffold is a mosaic assembled from distinct, successive genetic sources. These data are especially significant in light of: (i) experimental fragmentations of the Class I scaffold into three partitions that retain catalytic activities in proportion to their length; and (ii) evidence that two of these partitions arose from an ancestral Class I aaRS gene encoding a Class II ancestor in frame on the opposite strand. Phylogenetic metrics of different modules vary in accordance with their presumed functionality. A 46-residue Class I “protozyme” roots the Class I molecular tree prior to the adaptive radiation of the Rossmann dinucleotide binding fold that refined substrate discrimination. Such rooting is consistent with near simultaneous emergence of genetic coding and the origin of the proteome, resolving a conundrum posed by previous inferences that Class I aaRS evolved long after the genetic code had been implemented in an RNA world. Further, pinpointing discontinuous enhancements of aaRS fidelity establishes a timeline for the growth of coding from a binary amino acid alphabet.

The Roots of Genetic Coding in Aminoacyl-tRNA Synthetase Duality

Codon-dependent translation underlies genetics and phylogenetic inferences, but its origins pose two challenges. Prevailing narratives cannot account for the fact that aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (aaRSs), which translate the genetic code, must collectively enforce the rules used to assemble themselves. Nor can they explain how specific assignments arose from rudimentary differentiation between ancestral aaRSs and corresponding transfer RNAs (tRNAs). Experimental deconstruction of the two aaRS superfamilies created new experimental tools with which to analyze the emergence of the code. Amino acid and tRNA substrate recognition are linked to phase transfer free energies of amino acids and arise largely from aaRS class-specific differences in secondary structure. Sensitivity to protein folding rules endowed ancestral aaRS–tRNA pairs with the feedback necessary to rapidly compare alternative genetic codes and coding sequences. These and other experimental data suggest that the aaRS bidirectional genetic ancestry stabilized the differentiation and interdependence required to initiate and elaborate the genetic coding table. Expected final online publication date for the Annual Review of Biochemistry, Volume 90 is June 2021. Please see http://www.annualreviews.org/page/journal/pubdates for revised estimates.

Reciprocally-coupled Gating: Strange Loops in Bioenergetics, Genetics, and Catalysis

Bioenergetics, genetic coding, and catalysis are all difficult to imagine emerging without pre-existing historical context. That context is often posed as a “Chicken and Egg” problem; its resolution is concisely described by de Grasse Tyson: “the egg was laid by a bird that was not a chicken”. The concision and generality of that answer furnish no details—only an appropriate framework from which to examine detailed paradigms that might illuminate paradoxes underlying these three life-defining biomolecular processes. We examine experimental aspects here of five examples that all conform to the same paradigm. The paradox in each example is resolved by coupling if, and only if, conditions for two related transitions between levels. One drives, and each restricts fluxes through, or “gates” the other. That reciprocally-coupled gating, in which two gated processes constrain one another, maps onto the formal structure of “strange loops”. That mapping may help unite the axiomatic foundations of genetics, bioenergetics, and catalysis. As a physical analog for Gödel’s logic, biomolecular strange-loops provide a natural metaphor around which to organize these data, linking biology to the physics of information, free energy, and the second law of thermodynamics.

High-Resolution, Multidimensional Phylogenetic Metrics Identify Class I Aminoacyl-tRNA Synthetase Evolutionary Mosaicity and Inter-modular ‘Coupling

The provenance of the aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (aaRS) poses unusually challenging questions because of their role in the emergence and evolution of genetic coding. We investigate evidence about their ancestry from highly curated structure-based multiple sequence alignments of a small “scaffold” that is structurally invariant in all 10 canonical Class I aaRS. Statistically different values of two uncorrelated phylogenetic metrics—residue by residue conservation derived from Clustal and row-by-row cladistic congruence derived from BEAST2—suggest that the Class I scaffold is a mosaic assembled from distinct, successive genetic sources. These data are especially significant in light of: (i) experimental fragmentations of the Class I scaffold into three partitions that retain catalytic activities in proportion to their length; and (ii) multiple sources of evidence that two of these partitions arose from an ancestral Class I aaRS gene encoding a Class II ancestor in frame on the opposite strand. Two additional metrics output by BEAST2 vary in accordance with the presumed functionality endowed by the various modules. The new evidence supplements previous aaRS phylogenies. It identifies a previously characterized 46-residue Class I “protozyme” as preceding the adaptive radiation of the superfamily containing variations of the Rossmann dinucleotide binding fold related to amino acid discrimination, and thus as root of that molecular tree. Such a rooting is consistent with near simultaneous emergence of genetic coding and the origin of the proteome, resolving a conundrum posed by previous inferences that Class I aaRS evolved long after the genetic code had been implemented in an RNA world. Further, it establishes a timeline for the growth of coding from a binary amino acid alphabet by pinpointing discontinuous enhancements of aaRS fidelity.Author SummaryPhylogenetic analysis uncovers evolutionary connections between different protein superfamily members. We describe complementary, uncorrelated, phylogenetic metrics that support multiple evolutionary histories for different segments within members of the Class I aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase superfamily. Using a carefully curated 3D crystal structure superposition as the primary source of the multiple sequence alignment substantially reduced dependence of these metrics on empirical amino acid substitution matrices. Two metrics are derived from the amino acid distribution observed in each successive position. A third depends on how individual sequences distribute into phylogenetic tree branches for each of the ten amino acids activated by the superfamily. All metrics confirm that a segment previously identified as an inserted element is, indeed, a more recent acquisition, despite its structural conservation. The residue-by-residue conservation metrics reveal significant co-variation of mutational frequencies between a core segment that forms the amino acid binding site and a neighboring segment derived from the more recent insertion element. We attribute that covariation to the differentiation of superfamily members as evolutionary divergence enhanced amino acid specificity. Finally, evidence that the insertion element is a recent acquisition implies a new branching order for much of the proteome.

Class I and II aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase tRNA groove discrimination created the first synthetase•tRNA cognate pairs and was therefore essential to the origin of genetic coding

ABSTRACTThe genetic code likely arose when a bidirectional gene began to produce ancestral aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (aaRS) capable of distinguishing between two distinct sets of amino acids. The synthetase Class division therefore necessarily implies a mechanism by which the two ancestral synthetases could also discriminate between two different kinds of tRNA substrates. We used regression methods to uncover the possible patterns of base sequences capable of such discrimination and find that they appear to be related to thermodynamic differences in the relative stabilities of a hairpin necessary for recognition of tRNA substrates by Class I aaRS. The thermodynamic differences appear to be exploited by secondary structural differences between models for the ancestral aaRS called synthetase Urzymes and reinforced by packing of aromatic amino acid side chains against the nonpolar face of the ribose of A76 if and only if the tRNA CCA sequence forms a hairpin. The patterns of bases 1, 2 and 73 and stabilization of the hairpin by structural complementarity with Class I, but not Class II aaRS Urzymes appears to be necessary and sufficient to have enabled the generation of the first two aaRS•tRNA cognate pairs, and the launch of a rudimentary binary genetic coding related recognizably to contemporary cognate pairs. As a consequence, it seems likely that non-random aminoacylation of tRNAs preceded the advent of the tRNA anticodon stem-loop. Consistent with this suggestion, coding rules in the acceptor-stem bases also reveal a palimpsest of the codon•anticodon interaction, as previously proposed.