Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Dopamine Agonists in Advanced Parkinson's Disease With Motor Fluctuations: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trials

Background: Movement fluctuations are the main complication of Parkinson's disease (PD) patients receiving long-term levodopa (L-dopa) treatment. We compared and ranked the efficacy and safety of dopamine agonists (DAs) with regard to motor fluctuations by using a Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA) to quantify information from randomized controlled trials (RCTs).Methods and Findings: We carried out a systematic review and meta-analysis, and only RCTs comparing DAs for advanced PD were included. Electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library) were systematically searched for relevant studies published until January 2021. Two reviewers independently extracted individual study data and evaluated studies for risk of bias using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Network meta-analyses using a Bayesian framework were used to calculate the related parameters. The pre-specified primary and secondary outcomes were efficacy (“ON” time without troublesome dyskinesia, “OFF” time, “ON” time, “UPDRS-III,” and “UPDRS-II”) and safety [treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE) and other adverse events] of DAs. The results are presented as the surface under the cumulative ranking (SUCRA) curve. A total of 20 RCTs assessing 6,560 patients were included. The general DA effects were ranked from high to low with respect to the amount of “ON” time without troublesome dyskinesia as follows: apomorphine (SUCRA = 97.08%), pramipexole_IR (probability = 79.00%), and ropinirole_PR (SUCRA = 63.92%). The general safety of DAs was ranked from high to low with respect to TEAE as follows: placebo (SUCRA = 74.49%), pramipexole_ER (SUCRA = 63.6%), sumanirole (SUCRA = 54.07%), and rotigotine (SUCRA = 53.84%).Conclusions: This network meta-analysis shows that apomorphine increased “ON” time without troublesome dyskinesia and decreased “OF” time for advanced PD patients. The addition of pramipexole, ropinirole, or rotigotine to levodopa treatment in advanced PD patients with motor fluctuations increased “ON” time without troublesome dyskinesia, improved the UPDRS III scores, and ultimately ameliorated the UPDRS II scores, thereby maximizing its benefit. This NMA of pramipexole, ropinirole, and rotigotine represents an effective treatment option and has an acceptable safety profile in patients with advanced PD.

Off Time Independently Affects Quality of Life in Advanced Parkinson’s Disease (APD) Patients but Not in Non-APD Patients: Results from the Self-Reported Japanese Quality-of-Life Survey of Parkinson’s Disease (JAQPAD) Study

Introduction. Parkinson’s disease (PD) is characterized by a triad of motor symptoms and several nonmotor symptoms (NMS). Identifying the most appropriate treatment is essential for improving patient quality of life (QoL). However, it is still not known which PD symptoms more commonly affect patients with advanced PD (APD) versus non-APD. This study examined the factors that most affected the QoL of patients with APD (defined using the 5-2-1 criteria: ≥5 oral levodopa doses a day, off time ≥2 hours a day, or troublesome dyskinesia ≥1 hour a day) versus non-APD in a large Japanese population using the Japanese Quality-of-Life Survey of Parkinson’s Disease (JAQPAD) study. Methods. Participants in this self-reported survey-based study included all members of the Japan Parkinson’s Disease Association. Questionnaires assessing NMS and QoL (e.g., the 8-item PD Questionnaire [PDQ-8]) were included. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were conducted to identify clinical factors impacting QoL using the PDQ-8 Summary Index (PDQ-8 SI). Results. Of the 3022 eligible patients, 864 were classified as having non-APD and 1599 as having APD. QoL as assessed by the PDQ-8 SI was notably worse in patients with APD versus non-APD (39.2 vs. 26.9, p < 0.0001 ). Although off time affected QoL only in patients with APD, PD duration and the NMS Questionnaire score significantly contributed to the QoL in both patients with APD and non-APD. Conclusions. This study identified the factors more commonly associated with worse QoL in patients with APD versus non-APD. Our findings offer new insights for providing optimal treatment and improving treatment satisfaction in patients with PD.

Amantadine ER (Gocovri®) Significantly Increases ON Time Without Any Dyskinesia: Pooled Analyses From Pivotal Trials in Parkinson's Disease

Background: Clinical trials for antiparkinsonian drugs aimed at managing motor complications typically use patient diaries to divide levodopa-induced dyskinesias (LID) into “troublesome” and “non-troublesome” categories. Yet, given the choice, most patients would prefer to live without experiencing any dyskinesia. However, the concept of evaluating time spent ON without any dyskinesia as an outcome has never been tested. We conducted analyses of pooled Gocovri pivotal trial data in order to evaluate the extent to which Gocovri increased the time PD patients spent ON without dyskinesia (troublesome or non-troublesome), beyond its already identified improvement in reducing troublesome dyskinesia.Methods: Patients enrolled in phase 3 trials (EASE LID [NCT02136914] or EASE LID 3 [NCT02274766]) recorded time spent in the following PD diary states at baseline and Week 12 (endpoint): asleep, OFF, ON with troublesome dyskinesia, ON with non-troublesome dyskinesia, and ON without dyskinesia. Mixed model repeated measures analyses with estimated Cohen D effect sizes were performed on the modified intent to treat population to evaluate changes in time spent in these states.Results: Patients randomized to receive Gocovri showed an increase in ON time without dyskinesia and corresponding decreases in ON time with dyskinesia and OFF time vs. placebo. Treatment effects were statistically significant for Gocovri vs. placebo starting at Week 2 and were sustained until Week 12. On MMRM analysis at Week 12, patients in the Gocovri group showed an adjusted mean ± SE increase over placebo of 2.9 ± 0.6 h in ON time without dyskinesia (Cohen D effect size 0.79) and an adjusted mean ± SE decrease of −1.9 ± 0.6 h in ON time with dyskinesia (troublesome + non-troublesome) (Cohen D effect size 0.49), that included a −1.5 ± 0.4 h placebo-adjusted reduction in ON time with troublesome dyskinesia and a −0.6 ± 0.4 h reduction in ON time with non-troublesome dyskinesia. OFF time was reduced by −1.0 ± 0.3 h compared to placebo.Conclusions: Gocovri treatment more than doubled the daily time patients spent ON without dyskinesia. These results suggest that the Gocovri treatment effect was driven by a reduction in overall motor complications including ON time with both troublesome and non-troublesome dyskinesia as well as time spent OFF.

Application of the ‘5-2-1’ screening criteria in advanced Parkinson’s disease: interim analysis of DUOGLOBE

Aim: A Delphi expert consensus panel proposed that fulfilling ≥1 of the ‘5-2-1 criteria’ (≥five-times daily oral levodopa use, ≥two daily hours with ‘Off’ symptoms or ≥one daily hour with troublesome dyskinesia) suggests advanced Parkinson’s disease (PD). Patients & methods: DUOdopa/Duopa in Patients with Advanced PD – a GLobal OBservational Study Evaluating Long-Term Effectiveness (DUOGLOBE) – is a single-arm, postmarketing, observational, long-term effectiveness study of levodopa–carbidopa intestinal gel (LCIG) for advanced PD. Results: This 6-month interim analysis (n = 139) affirms that most (98%) enrolled patients fulfill ≥1 of the 5-2-1 criteria. These patients responded favorably to LCIG treatment. Safety was consistent with other LCIG studies. Conclusion: In advanced PD patients, the 5-2-1 criteria generally aligns with clinician assessment. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT02611713 ( ClinicalTrials.gov )

5-2-1 Criteria: A Simple Screening Tool for Identifying Advanced PD Patients Who Need an Optimization of Parkinson’s Treatment

Objective. 5- (5 times oral levodopa tablet taken/day) 2- (2 hours of OFF time/day) 1- (1 hour/day of troublesome dyskinesia) criteria have been proposed by a Delphi expert consensus panel for diagnosing advanced Parkinson’s disease (PD). The aim of the present study is to compare quality of life (QoL) in PD patients with “5-2-1 positive criteria” vs QoL in PD patients without “5-2-1 positive criteria” (defined as meeting ≥1 of the criteria). Methods. This is a cross-sectional, observational, monocenter study. Three different instruments were used to assess QoL: the 39-Item Parkinson’s Disease Quality of Life Questionnaire Summary Index Score (PDQ-39SI); a subjective rating of perceived QoL (PQ-10); and the EUROHIS-QOL 8-Item Index (EUROHIS-QOL8). Results. From a cohort of 102 PD patients (65.4 ± 8.2 years old, 53.9% males; disease duration 4.7 ± 4.5 years), 20 (19.6%) presented positive 5-2-1 criteria: 6.9% for 5, 17.6% for 2, and 4.9% for 1. 37.5% (12/32) and 25% (5/20) of patients with motor complications and dyskinesia, respectively, presented 5-2-1 negative criteria. Both health-related (PDQ-39SI, 25.6 ± 14 vs 12.1 ± 9.2; p<0.0001) and global QoL (PQ-10, 6.1 ± 2 vs 7.1 ± 1.3; p=0.007; EUROHIS-QOL8, 3.5 ± 0.5 vs 3.7 ± 0.4; p=0.034) were worse in patients with 5-2-1 positive criteria. Moreover, nonmotor symptoms burden (Non-Motor Symptoms Scale total score, 64.8 ± 44.8 vs 39.4 ± 35.1; p<0.0001) and autonomy for activities of daily living (ADLS scale, 73.5 ± 13.1 vs 89.2 ± 9.3; p<0.0001) were worse in patients with 5-2-1 positive criteria. Patient’s principal caregiver’s strain (Caregiver Stain Index, 4.3 ± 3 vs 1.5 ± 1.6; p<0.0001), burden (Zarit Caregiver Burden Inventory, 28.4 ± 12.5 vs 10.9 ± 9.8; p<0.0001), and mood (Beck Depression Inventory II, 12.2 ± 7.2 vs 6.2 ± 6.1; p<0.0001) were worse in patients with 5-2-1 positive criteria as well. Conclusions. QoL is worse in patients meeting ≥1 of the 5-2-1 criteria. This group of patients and their caregivers are more affected as a whole. These criteria could be useful for identifying patients in which it is necessary to optimize Parkinson’s treatment.

Efficacy and safety of extended-release amantadine in levodopa-induced dyskinesias: a meta-analysis

Aim: To determine the effectiveness and safety of extended-release amantadine (ADS-5102) for levodopa-induced dyskinesias (LID) in patients with Parkinson disease (PD) by conducting a meta-analysis of relevant trials. Methods: The electronic databases were searched on or before March 1, 2019 for relevant trials. Only randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled trials using ADS-5102 for LID in PD were included. Results: The ADS-5102 showed a reduction in the dyskinesia scores (mean difference: -9.56: CI: -10.05 to -9.07; p < 0.00001) and in the on time without troublesome dyskinesia (mean difference 2.50: CI 2.38 to 2.63; p < 0.00001). The adverse events identified in ADS-5102 were visual hallucinations, constipation, dry mouth and fall. Conclusion: ADS-5102 can be used as an adjunct therapy for LID.

Increased dose of carbidopa with levodopa and entacapone improves “off” time in a randomized trial

ObjectiveTo investigate whether increased fixed carbidopa doses of 65 or 105 mg (ODM-101/65 and ODM-101/105) in combination with 75, 100, 125, or 150 mg of levodopa and 200 mg of entacapone might improve “off” time in fluctuating Parkinson disease (PD) compared to the standard combination of 4:1 levodopa/carbidopa with the usual 200 mg of entacapone (LCE) during a 4-week treatment period.MethodsThis was a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, active-controlled, crossover, multicenter, phase II, proof-of-concept study in patients with fluctuating PD.ResultsOne hundred seventeen patients were randomized into the study (mean age 67.0 years; daily “off” time 5.3 hours; mean daily levodopa dose 610 mg). Carryover-adjusted mean changes from baseline “off” times were during ODM-101/65, −1.53 hours (p = 0.02 vs LCE), during ODM-101/105, −1.57 hours (p = 0.01 vs LCE), and during LCE −0.91 hours. Changes in daily “on” time without dyskinesia were 1.54 hours (p = 0.005 vs LCE), 1.38 hours (p = 0.0214 vs LCE), and 0.69 hours, respectively. Changes in “on” time with troublesome dyskinesia were <0.1 hours and not significantly different between treatments. In patients with high-activity COMT genotypes Val/Met or Val/Val, “off” time was reduced more with ODM-101/65 and ODM-101/105 than with LCE (p = 0.015 and p = 0.006). No difference between the treatments was seen in safety and tolerability. The most common treatment-related adverse effects were nausea, dizziness, drug-effect decrease, and dyskinesia, which were in most cases mild or moderate in severity. Treatment-related serious adverse events were diarrhea (ODM-101/105 and LCE), and myocardial ischemia and blood creatine kinase increase (LCE).ConclusionIncreasing the dose of carbidopa in combination with levodopa and entacapone should be considered in the treatment of fluctuating PD to improve daily “off” times. Genotyping patients with PD according to COMT activity may improve individual treatment strategies.ClinicalTrials.gov identifierNCT01766258.Classification of evidenceThis study provides Class II evidence that an increased dose of carbidopa improves motor fluctuations when administered with levodopa and entacapone.