ritalinic acid
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

40
(FIVE YEARS 8)

H-INDEX

14
(FIVE YEARS 1)

2021 ◽  
pp. e00258
Author(s):  
Sheng Feng ◽  
Erin Strickland ◽  
Jeffery Enders ◽  
Michaela Roslawski ◽  
Timothy McIntire ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (8) ◽  
pp. 733
Author(s):  
Julia Aresti-Sanz ◽  
Markus Schwalbe ◽  
Rob Rodrigues Pereira ◽  
Hjalmar Permentier ◽  
Sahar El Aidy

Methylphenidate is one of the most widely used oral treatments for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). The drug is mainly absorbed in the small intestine and has low bioavailability. Accordingly, a high interindividual variability in terms of response to the treatment is known among ADHD patients treated with methylphenidate. Nonetheless, very little is known about the factors that influence the drug’s absorption and bioavailability. Gut microbiota has been shown to reduce the bioavailability of a wide variety of orally administered drugs. Here, we tested the ability of small intestinal bacteria to metabolize methylphenidate. In silico analysis identified several small intestinal bacteria to harbor homologues of the human carboxylesterase 1 enzyme responsible for the hydrolysis of methylphenidate in the liver into the inactive form, ritalinic acid. Despite our initial results hinting towards possible bacterial hydrolysis of the drug, up to 60% of methylphenidate is spontaneously hydrolyzed in the absence of bacteria and this hydrolysis is pH-dependent. Overall, our results indicate that the stability of methylphenidate is compromised under certain pH conditions in the presence or absence of gut microbiota.


2020 ◽  
Vol 385 ◽  
pp. 121554
Author(s):  
Marta Woźniak-Karczewska ◽  
Daniel Baranowski ◽  
Grzegorz Framski ◽  
Łukasz Marczak ◽  
Monika Čvančarová ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (1) ◽  
pp. 61 ◽  
Author(s):  
Avi Harlev ◽  
Ralf Henkel ◽  
Luna Samanta ◽  
Ashok Agarwal

2019 ◽  
Vol 76 (2) ◽  
pp. 229-237 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michel Arvidsson ◽  
Marja-Liisa Dahl ◽  
Olof Beck ◽  
Gerd Ackehed ◽  
Karin Nordin ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose The primary aim of this study was to explore the potential of alternative sampling matrices for methylphenidate by assessing the correlations between dl-threo-methylphenidate and dl-threo-ritalinic acid concentrations in exhaled breath and oral fluid with those in plasma, in repeated samples collected after a single oral dose of methylphenidate. The secondary aim was to study the enantioselective pharmacokinetics of methylphenidate in plasma, with a focus on interindividual variability in the metabolism of methylphenidate to ritalinic acid. Methods Twelve healthy volunteers received a single oral dose of dl-threo-methylphenidate (Ritalin® capsules, 20 mg). Venous blood samples were collected for 24 h, and plasma analyzed for threo-enantiomers of methylphenidate and ritalinic acid with LC-MS/MS. Repeated sampling of exhaled breath, using a particle filter device, and of non-stimulated oral fluid, using a felt pad device, was also performed. Exhaled breath and oral fluid were analyzed with a non-enantioselective LC-MS/MS method for dl-threo-methylphenidate and dl-threo-ritalinic acid. Results In all subjects, d-threo-methylphenidate was detectable in plasma for at least 15 h after the dose with a biphasic profile. l-threo-Methylphenidate was measurable in only five subjects and in most cases in low concentrations. However, one female subject displayed a biphasic concentration-time profile for l-threo-methylphenidate. This subject also had the highest d-threo-methylphenidate AUC (191 ng*h/mL versus 32–119 ng*h/mL in the other subjects). d-threo-Ritalinic acid concentrations were on average 25-fold higher (range 6–126) than the corresponding d-threo-methylphenidate concentrations. Single-time point plasma concentration ratios between d-threo-ritalinic acid and d-threo-methylphenidate 1.5–12 h after dose correlated highly (r = 0.88–0.98) with the d-threo-ritalinic acid AUC/d-threo-methylphenidate AUC ratio. In eleven subjects, dl-threo-methylphenidate in oral fluid mirrored the biphasic profile of methylphenidate (sum of d- and l-threo-enantiomers) in plasma, but the concentrations in oral fluid were on average 1.8 times higher than in plasma. dl-threo-Methylphenidate was detected in exhaled breath in all subjects, but there was no consistent concentration-time pattern. Conclusions In some subjects, the pharmacologically less active l-threo-enantiomer may contribute to the total plasma methylphenidate concentrations. Monitoring methylphenidate concentrations without enantiomeric determination carries the risk of missing such subjects, which might affect how the plasma concentrations of methylphenidate are interpreted and used for clinical decision making. The use of exhaled breath and oral fluid to assess medication adherence to MPH in patients with ADHD warrants further studies.


Author(s):  
Claus Stage ◽  
Kim Dalhoff ◽  
Henrik Berg Rasmussen ◽  
Louise Schow Guski ◽  
Ragnar Thomsen ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 294 ◽  
pp. 183-188 ◽  
Author(s):  
Moonhee Jang ◽  
Jihyun Kim ◽  
Ilchung Shin ◽  
Seojin Kang ◽  
Hyeyoung Choi ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 43 ◽  
pp. 44-52 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aza Kobakhidze ◽  
Vladimir Elisashvili ◽  
Philippe F.-X. Corvini ◽  
Monika Čvančarová
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document