daughter cell separation
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

31
(FIVE YEARS 0)

H-INDEX

15
(FIVE YEARS 0)

eLife ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hyang Mi Moon ◽  
Simon Hippenmeyer ◽  
Liqun Luo ◽  
Anthony Wynshaw-Boris

Heterozygous loss of human PAFAH1B1 (coding for LIS1) results in the disruption of neurogenesis and neuronal migration via dysregulation of microtubule (MT) stability and dynein motor function/localization that alters mitotic spindle orientation, chromosomal segregation, and nuclear migration. Recently, human- induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC) models revealed an important role for LIS1 in controlling the length of terminal cell divisions of outer radial glial (oRG) progenitors, suggesting cellular functions of LIS1 in regulating neural progenitor cell (NPC) daughter cell separation. Here, we examined the late mitotic stages NPCs in vivo and mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) in vitro from Pafah1b1-deficient mutants. Pafah1b1-deficient neocortical NPCs and MEFs similarly exhibited cleavage plane displacement with mislocalization of furrow-associated markers, associated with actomyosin dysfunction and cell membrane hyper-contractility. Thus, it suggests LIS1 acts as a key molecular link connecting MTs/dynein and actomyosin, ensuring that cell membrane contractility is tightly controlled to execute proper daughter cell separation.



2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hyang Mi Moon ◽  
Simon Hippenmeyer ◽  
Liqun Luo ◽  
Anthony Wynshaw-Boris

ABSTRACTHeterozygous loss of human PAFAH1B1 (coding for LIS1) results in the disruption of neurogenesis and neuronal migration via dysregulation of microtubule (MT) stability and dynein motor function/localization that alters mitotic spindle orientation, chromosomal segregation, and nuclear migration. Recently, human induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC) models revealed an important role for LIS1 in controlling the length of terminal cell divisions of outer radial glial (oRG) progenitors, suggesting cellular functions of LIS1 in regulating neural progenitor cell (NPC) daughter cell separation. Here we examined the late mitotic stages NPCs in vivo and mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) in vitro from Lis1-deficient mutants. Lis1-deficient neocortical NPCs and MEFs similarly exhibited cleavage plane displacement with mislocalization of furrow-associated markers, associated with actomyosin dysfunction and cell membrane hyper-contractility. Thus, it suggests LIS1 acts as a key molecular link connecting MTs/dynein and actomyosin, ensuring that cell membrane contractility is tightly controlled to execute proper daughter cell separation.



2019 ◽  
Vol 112 (4) ◽  
pp. 1100-1115 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna I. Weaver ◽  
Valeria Jiménez‐Ruiz ◽  
Srikar R. Tallavajhala ◽  
Brett P. Ransegnola ◽  
Kimberly Q. Wong ◽  
...  


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna I. Weaver ◽  
Valeria Jiménez-Ruiz ◽  
Srikar R. Tallavajhalla ◽  
Brett P. Ransegnola ◽  
Kimberly Q. Wong ◽  
...  

ABSTRACTThe cell wall is a crucial structural feature in the vast majority of bacteria and comprises a rigid, covalently closed, mesh-like network of peptidoglycan (PG) strands. While PG synthesis is important for bacterial survival under many conditions, the cell wall is also a dynamic structure, undergoing degradation and remodeling by so-called “autolysins”, enzymes that break bonds in the PG network. Cell division, for example, requires extensive PG remodeling and separation of daughter cells, which depends primarily upon the activity of amidases. However, inV. cholerae, we have found that amidase activity alone is insufficient for daughter cell separation and that the lytic transglycosylases RlpA and MltC both contribute to this process. MltC and RlpA both localize to the septum and are functionally redundant under normal laboratory conditions; however, only RlpA can support normal cell separation in low salt media. The division-specific activity of lytic transglycosylases has implications for the local structure of septal PG, suggesting that there may be glycan bridges between daughter cells that cannot be resolved by amidases. We propose that lytic transglycosylases at the septum serve as a back-up mechanism to cleave rare, stochastically produced PG strands that are crosslinked beyond the reach of the highly spatio-temporally limited activity of the amidase and to clear PG debris that may block the completion of outer-membrane invagination.



2018 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 1131-1137 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuxuan Jiang ◽  
Xudong Liang ◽  
Ming Guo ◽  
Yanping Cao ◽  
Shengqiang Cai


2017 ◽  
Vol 199 (14) ◽  
Author(s):  
Atsushi Yahashiri ◽  
Matthew A. Jorgenson ◽  
David S. Weiss

ABSTRACT Sporulation-related repeat (SPOR) domains are small peptidoglycan (PG) binding domains found in thousands of bacterial proteins. The name “SPOR domain” stems from the fact that several early examples came from proteins involved in sporulation, but SPOR domain proteins are quite diverse and contribute to a variety of processes that involve remodeling of the PG sacculus, especially with respect to cell division. SPOR domains target proteins to the division site by binding to regions of PG devoid of stem peptides (“denuded” glycans), which in turn are enriched in septal PG by the intense, localized activity of cell wall amidases involved in daughter cell separation. This targeting mechanism sets SPOR domain proteins apart from most other septal ring proteins, which localize via protein-protein interactions. In addition to SPOR domains, bacteria contain several other PG-binding domains that can exploit features of the cell wall to target proteins to specific subcellular sites.



2016 ◽  
Vol 22 (6) ◽  
pp. 477-486 ◽  
Author(s):  
Catherine Chaput ◽  
Chantal Ecobichon ◽  
Nadine Pouradier ◽  
Jean-Claude Rousselle ◽  
Abdelkader Namane ◽  
...  


mBio ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaoxue Zhou ◽  
David K. Halladin ◽  
Julie A. Theriot

ABSTRACT Dividing cells of the coccoid Gram-positive bacterium Staphylococcus aureus undergo extremely rapid (millisecond) daughter cell separation (DCS) driven by mechanical crack propagation, a strategy that is very distinct from the gradual, enzymatically driven cell wall remodeling process that has been well described in several rod-shaped model bacteria. To determine if other bacteria, especially those in the same phylum ( Firmicutes ) or with similar coccoid shapes as S. aureus , might use a similar mechanically driven strategy for DCS, we used high-resolution video microscopy to examine cytokinesis in a phylogenetically wide range of species with various cell shapes and sizes. We found that fast mechanically driven DCS is rather rare in the Firmicutes (low G+C Gram positives), observed only in Staphylococcus and its closest coccoid relatives in the Macrococcus genus, and we did not observe this division strategy among the Gram-negative Proteobacteria . In contrast, several members of the high-G+C Gram-positive phylum Actinobacteria ( Micrococcus luteus , Brachybacterium faecium , Corynebacterium glutamicum , and Mycobacterium smegmatis ) with diverse shapes ranging from coccoid to rod all undergo fast mechanical DCS during cell division. Most intriguingly, similar fast mechanical DCS was also observed during the sporulation of the actinobacterium Streptomyces venezuelae . IMPORTANCE Much of our knowledge on bacterial cytokinesis comes from studying rod-shaped model organisms such as Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis . Less is known about variations in this process among different bacterial species. While cell division in many bacteria has been characterized to some extent genetically or biochemically, few species have been examined using video microscopy to uncover the kinetics of cytokinesis and daughter cell separation (DCS). In this work, we found that fast (millisecond) DCS is exhibited by species in two independent clades of Gram-positive bacteria and is particularly prevalent among the Actinobacteria , a diverse group that includes significant pathogens as well as bacteria that generate medically important antibiotics.



2016 ◽  
Vol 48 (4) ◽  
pp. 354-362 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hua Li ◽  
Penggao Hu ◽  
Xiuyun Zhao ◽  
Ziniu Yu ◽  
Lin Li


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document