cu isotope
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

54
(FIVE YEARS 17)

H-INDEX

16
(FIVE YEARS 2)

2022 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simon Blotevogel ◽  
Priscia Oliva ◽  
Laurence Denaix ◽  
Stéphane Audry ◽  
Jerome Viers ◽  
...  

Even though copper (Cu) is an essential plant nutrient, it can become toxic under certain conditions. Toxic effects do not only depend on soil Cu content, but also on environmental and physiological factors, that are not well understood. In this study, the mechanisms of Cu bioavailability and the homeostasis of Vitis vinifera L. cv. Tannat were investigated under controlled conditions, using stable Cu isotope analysis. We measured Cu concentrations and δ65Cu isotope ratios in soils, soil solutions, roots, and leaves of grapevine plants grown on six different vineyard soils, in a 16-week greenhouse experiment. The mobility of Cu in the soil solutions was controlled by the solubility of soil organic matter. No direct relationship between Cu contents in soils or soil solutions and Cu contents in roots could be established, indicating a partly homeostatic control of Cu uptake. Isotope fractionation between soil solutions and roots shifted from light to heavy with increasing Cu exposure, in line with a shift from active to passive uptake. Passive uptake appears to exceed active uptake for soil solution concentrations higher than 270 μg L–1. Isotope fractionation between roots and leaves was increasingly negative with increasing root Cu contents, even though the leaf Cu contents did not differ significantly. Our results suggest that Cu isotope analysis is a sensitive tool to monitor differences in Cu uptake and translocation pathways even before differences in tissue contents can be observed.


2021 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhaoping Yang ◽  
Simon Edward Jackson ◽  
Thomas Skulski

Laser ablation inductively coupled plasma multi-collector mass spectrometry (LA-MC-ICP-MS) allows rapid, in situ, highly precise measurements of Cu isotope ratios of native Cu and Cu-bearing minerals. However, the National Institute of Standards and Technology Cu-metal isotope standard NIST SRM976 that is commonly used to calibrate LA-MC-ICP-MS Cu isotope measurements of native Cu is no longer available. We have investigated the suitability of four Cu metal materials, SSC-1, SSC-3 and SSC-4 (cathode Cu metal rods) and CUPD-1 (Cu anode sawings), originally developed by the Canada Centre for Mineral and Energy Technology (CANMET) as certified reference materials for trace element analysis, as Cu isotope reference materials for LA-MC-ICP-MS analysis and solution nebulization (SN) of Cu. The Cu isotopic composition and homogeneity of these four materials were characterised by SN- and LA-MC-ICP-MS, and are reported for the first time. The bulk Cu isotopic compositions, expressed as δ65CuSRM976 in per mil (‰) relative to NIST SRM976 with combined uncertainties (U, k = 2), of SSC-1, SSC-3 and SSC-4, determined utilizing SN-MC-ICP-MS, are identical within analytical uncertainty at 0.03 ± 0.07‰ (n = 29), 0.04 ± 0.04‰ (n = 28), and 0.05 ± 0.08‰ (n = 29), respectively; the composition of CUPD-1 is 2.14 ± 0.08‰ (n = 28). The compositions are 0.01 ± 0.07‰ (n = 29), 0.04 ± 0.06‰ (n = 29), 0.03 ± 0.06‰ (n = 28) and 2.15 ± 0.06‰ (n = 28), respectively, relative to the European Reference Material ERM®-AE633 Cu isotope standard. The Cu isotope homogeneity of the four new reference materials was assessed by determining whether multiple individual in situ Cu isotope measurements made by LA-MC-ICP-MS analysis (43 µm spot size), using each of the other three reference materials as a calibrator, approximate a single normal distribution. We also investigate whether there are statistically significant differences between the mean δ65Cu values of three independent data sets for each of the Cu isotope reference materials using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Normality tests (graphical assessment of normal distribution quantile-quantile plots, and the Shapiro-Wilk, Jarque-Bera and reduced chi-squared statistic tests) show that: 1) the Cu isotope data acquired on SSC-1, SSC-3, SSC-4 and CUPD-1 do not depart significantly from a normal distribution, 2) the scatter of the Cu isotope data is due to analytical uncertainty with 95% confidence, and 3) there are no other significant sources of scatter; e.g. heterogeneity of the reference materials. The results of one-way ANOVA reveal that the mean difference of the δ65Cu value for each of the reference materials SSC-1, SSC-3, SSC-4 and CUPD-1 is statistically not significant at the 0.05 level. The mean δ65CuSRM976 values with combined uncertainties (U, k = 2) of SSC-1, SSC-3, SSC-4 and CUPD-1, determined by LA-MC-ICP-MS using each of the other three reference materials as a calibration standard, are 0.03 ± 0.09‰ (n = 132), 0.05 ± 0.09‰ (n = 154), 0.03 ± 0.09‰ (n = 144) and 2.14 ± 0.10‰ (n = 106), respectively. These values are in agreement with those determined by SN-MC-ICP-MS analysis at the 95% confidence level and have excellent precision (2 s.d. ≤ 0.10‰). These results suggest that SSC-1, SSC-3, SSC-4 and CUPD-1 can be considered isotopically homogeneous at a spatial resolution of 43 μm, and they are suitable reference materials for calibration and quality control of in situ and solution nebulization Cu isotope analyses of Cu.


2021 ◽  
Vol 298 ◽  
pp. 191-206
Author(s):  
Drew D. Syverson ◽  
David M. Borrok ◽  
Spencer Niebuhr ◽  
William E. Seyfried

2021 ◽  
Vol 564 ◽  
pp. 120060
Author(s):  
Shanqi Liu ◽  
Yongbing Li ◽  
Jie Liu ◽  
Zhiming Yang ◽  
Jianming Liu ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Apolline Samin ◽  
Eoghan Reeves ◽  
Andreas Beinlich ◽  
Jamieson John ◽  
Desiree Roerdink

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andreas Kaufmann ◽  
Marina Lazarov ◽  
Stefan Weyer ◽  
Stefan Kiefer ◽  
Juraj Majzlan
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
Vol 62 ◽  
pp. 126611 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Toubhans ◽  
A.T Gourlan ◽  
P. Telouk ◽  
K. Lutchman-Singh ◽  
L.W. Francis ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 457 ◽  
pp. 116414
Author(s):  
Nan Lv ◽  
Zhian Bao ◽  
Lu Chen ◽  
Kaiyun Chen ◽  
Yan Zhang ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document