household productivity
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

38
(FIVE YEARS 6)

H-INDEX

6
(FIVE YEARS 1)

Land ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (9) ◽  
pp. 988
Author(s):  
Jinna Yu ◽  
Yiming Wei ◽  
Wei Fang ◽  
Zhen Liu ◽  
Yujie Zhang ◽  
...  

The purpose of this paper was to analyze the influence mechanism of the new round of Collective Forest Rights Reform (CFRR) on farmers’ production efficiency from the perspective of forestland transfer. Based on the panel data of field investigation in Jiangxi Province, a panel logit model was used to verify whether the new round of CFRR has affected farmers’ forestland circulation behavior. The results showed that the new round of CFRR has played a significant role in promoting forestland circulation. Secondly, the non-parametric DEA method was used to estimate the technical, scale, and comprehensive efficiency of households. DID and panel quantile models were constructed to analyze the impact of forestland inflow policy and forestland outflow policy effects on rural household productivity. The regression results showed that the effect of forestland inflow has had a significantly positive impact on scale and comprehensive efficiency, but it only had a significant effect on technical efficiency in the 0.1 quartile. The effect of forestland outflow was not found to be significant for technical, scale, and comprehensive efficiency, but it was found to be negative for technical efficiency in the 0.75 quartile and negative for scale efficiency in the 0.5 and 0.75 quantiles.


2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 124-134
Author(s):  
Afridah Ikrimah ◽  
Beauty Martha Lingga ◽  
Ilham Bagus Prasetia ◽  
Faris Achmad Baharudin ◽  
Mohamad Yogananta ◽  
...  

Mojorejo village is one of the productive migrant villages (DESMIGRATIF) in Indonesia. This study aims to determine the alternative way to increase TKI household productivity of through optimization of remittances and to desain a remittance optimization program in building a constructive financial management for TKI households in Mojorejo Village, Karangmalang, Sragen.  This study uses a descriptive analysis with qualitative and systematic review approach.  Data collection techniques were carried out by review the previous research and empowerement, observation through field survey, interview with informan and secondary data searching.  The results show that the problem on increasing TKI household productivity is unoptimal remittance management and it tends to use for consumptive activities.  Lack of public awareness to allocate remittances for investment and productive business causes the stagnant economic growth and does not lead to economic improvement in the surrounding environment. Therefore, remittance optimization can be done through the community empowerment that focus in four activities, namely financial planning training for TKI households, entrepreneurship training and business plan simulations, training in processing, packaging and marketing of rice rambak crackers, and managing mini tourism object of reservoir and selfies of "Kembangan Bersolek" in  Mojorejo Village, Karangmalang, Sragen.


Rheumatology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 59 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Karl Gaffney ◽  
Atul Deodhar ◽  
Lianne Gensler ◽  
Jonathan Kay ◽  
Walter Maksymowych ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Certolizumab pegol (CZP) treatment has been shown to significantly improve work and household productivity and social participation compared to placebo in active non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (nr-axSpA) patients up to 24 weeks. Here, we report the impact of CZP in combination with non-biologic background medication (NBBM) on signs and symptoms of nr-axSpA compared to placebo+NBBM. Methods C-axSpAnd (NCT02552212) is a 3-year, phase 3, multicentre study including a 52-week double-blind, placebo-controlled period (completed). Patients had active nr-axSpA, objective signs of inflammation (OSI; elevated CRP and/or positive MRI of the sacroiliac joint), previous inadequate response to ≥ 2 NSAIDs and were randomised 1:1 to CZP (400 mg at Weeks 0/2/4, then 200 mg every 2 weeks) or placebo. The validated arthritis-specific Work Productivity Survey (WPS) assessed the impact of nr-axSpA on work and household productivity and social participation. Missing data were imputed using last observation carried forward (LOCF) post hoc in the Full Analysis Set (randomised patients who received ≥1 dose of CZP). Results 317 patients were randomised (CZP: 159; placebo: 158). Mean age at baseline was 37.3 years and 51.4% of patients were female. At baseline, most patients were employed (CZP: 124 [77.8%]; placebo: 123 [78.0%]) and reported a mean 3.7 (CZP) and 3.5 (placebo) workdays missed per month due to disease (Table 1). By Week 12, work absenteeism substantially improved in the CZP group compared with placebo (0.9 vs 2.1 days missed per month, LOCF), with further improvements at Week 52 (0.3 vs 2.0 days missed per month, LOCF). Between Week 12 and Week 52, most placebo patients (104, 65.8%) switched to open-label CZP, impacting Week 52 imputed outcomes. Despite this, similar patterns of improvement following CZP treatment were seen for absenteeism, workdays with impaired productivity, household days with missed/reduced productivity and social participation between imputed and observed case data (Table 1). Improvements were similar between male and female patients (data not shown). Conclusion CZP treatment resulted in improvements in work and household productivity and social participation for nr-axSpA patients as early as Week 12 compared to background medication only, with benefits maintained to Week 52. Disclosures K. Gaffney: Other; Research Grants/Consultancy Fees from Abbvie, Biogen, Celgene, Gilead, Izana, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB Pharma. A. Deodhar: Consultancies; AbbVie, Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Glaxo Smith and Klein, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB. Grants/research support; BMS, Eli Lilly, Glaxo Smith & Kline, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB. L. Gensler: Consultancies; Galapagos, Eli Lilly and Janssen. Grants/research support; AbbVie, Amgen, Novartis, UCB Pharma. J. Kay: Consultancies; AbbVie, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celltrion Healthcare, Horizon Therapeutics, Merck Sharp & Dohme, MorphoSys, Novartis, Pfizer, Samsung Bioepis, Sandoz and UCB Pharma. Grants/research support; Gilead Sciences, Novartis AG, Pfizer and UCB Pharma. W. Maksymowych: Other; Consultant and/or speaker fees and/or grants from AbbVie, Amgen, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Merck, Pfizer, Synarc, Sanofi and UCB Pharma. N. Haroon: Consultancies; Abbvie, Amgen, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis and UCB Pharma. R. Landewé: Consultancies; Abbott, Ablynx, Amgen, Astra-Zeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Centocor, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, Merck, Pfizer, Roche, Schering-Plough, UCB Pharma, Wyeth. Member of speakers’ bureau; Abbott, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Centocor, Merck, Pfizer, Roche, Schering-Plough, UCB Pharma, Wyeth. Grants/research support; Abbott, Amgen, Centocor, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Schering-Plough, UCB Pharma, Wyeth. M. Rudwaleit: Consultancies; Abbott, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Janssen, MSD, Pfizer, Roche, UCB Pharma. S. Hall: Other; Consulting fees/ research grants from AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Novartis, and UCB Pharma. L. Bauer: Other; Employee of UCB Pharma. B. Hoepken: Other; Employee of UCB Pharma. N. de Peyrecave: Other; Employee of UCB Pharma. T. Kumke: Other; Employee of UCB Pharma. D. van der Heijde: Consultancies; AbbVie, Amgen, Astellas, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Daiichi, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Gilead, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron, Roche, Sanofi, and UCB. Other; Director of Imaging Rheumatology BV.


2020 ◽  
Vol 14 ◽  
pp. 263349412096451
Author(s):  
David F. Archer ◽  
Ahmed M. Soliman ◽  
Sanjay K. Agarwal ◽  
Hugh S. Taylor

While the most common symptom associated with endometriosis is pelvic pain, the systemic manifestations of the disease and the accompanying adverse psychological, emotional, social, familial, sexual, educational and workplace effects are increasingly recognized. Elagolix is an oral gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor antagonist that is approved for the management of moderate to severe pain associated with endometriosis. However, the benefits of elagolix extend beyond reducing pain symptoms. This article reviews the non-pain systemic manifestations associated with endometriosis and summarizes the beneficial effects of elagolix on non-pain outcomes. This includes improvements in quality of life, reductions in fatigue and improvements in workplace and household productivity. These results indicate that elagolix provides non-pain benefits in women with endometriosis and improves outcomes that are clinically meaningful to patients.


Agribusiness ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 33 (4) ◽  
pp. 586-599 ◽  
Author(s):  
Immaculate Omondi ◽  
Elizaphan J. O. Rao ◽  
Aziz A. Karimov ◽  
Isabelle Baltenweck

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document