Induction of Robust Future Liver Remnant Hypertrophy Before Hepatectomy With a Modified Liver Venous Deprivation Technique Using a Trans-venous Access for Hepatic Vein Embolization

Purpose: Hepatic and/or portal vein embolization are performed before hepatectomy for patients with insufficient future liver remnant and usually achieved with a trans-hepatic approach. The aim of the present study is to describe a modified trans-venous liver venous deprivation technique (mLVD), avoiding the potential risks and limitations of a percutaneous approach to hepatic vein embolization, and to assess the safety, efficacy, and surgical outcome after mLVD.Materials and Methods: Retrospective single-center institutional review board-approved study. From March 2016 to June 2019, consecutive oncologic patients with combined portal and hepatic vein embolization were included. CT volumetric analysis was performed before and after mLVD to assess liver hypertrophy. Complications related to mLVD and surgical outcome were obtained from medical records.Results: Thirty patients (62.7 ± 14.5 years old, 20 men) with liver metastasis (60%) or primary liver cancer (40%) underwent mLVD. Twenty-one patients (70%) had hepatic vein anatomic variants. Technical success of mLVD was 100%. Four patients had complications (three minor and one major). FLR hypertrophy was 64.2% ± 51.3% (mean ± SD). Twenty-four patients (80%) underwent the planned hepatectomy and no surgery was canceled as a consequence of mLVD complications or insufficient hypertrophy. Fifty percent of patients (12/24) had no or mild complications after surgery (Clavien-Dindo 0–II), and 45.8% (11/24) had more serious complications (Clavien-Dindo III–IV). Thirty-day mortality was 4.2% (1/24).Conclusion: mLVD is an effective method to induce FLR hypertrophy. This technique is applicable in a wide range of oncologic situations and in patients with complex right liver vein anatomy.

Portal and hepatic vein embolization prior to major hepatectomy

Purpose To analyze safety and effectiveness of simultaneous portal and hepatic vein embolization (PHVE) or sequential hepatic vein embolization (HVE) compared to portal vein embolization (PVE) for future remnant liver (FRL) hypertrophy prior to major hepatic surgery. Methods Patients undergoing PVE, PHVE or HVE at our tertiary care center between 2018 and 2020 were retrospectively included. FRLV, standardized FRLV (sFRLV) and sFRLV growth rate per day were assessed via volumetry, as well as laboratory parameters. Results 36 patients (f = 15, m = 21; median 64.5 y) were included, 16 patients received PHVE and 20 patients PVE, of which 4 received sequential HVE. Significant increase of FRLV was achieved with both PVE and PHVE compared to baseline (p < 0.0001). sFRLV growth rate did not significantly differ following PHVE (2.2 ± 1.2 %/d) or PVE (2.2 ± 1.7 %/d, p = 0.94). Left portal vein thrombosis (LPVT) was observed after PHVE in 6 patients and in 1 patient after PVE. Sequential HVE showed a considerably high growth rate of 1.42 ± 0.45 %/d after PVE. Conclusion PHVE effectively induces FRL hypertrophy but yields comparable sFRLV to PVE. Sequential HVE further induces hypertrophy after insufficient growth due to PVE. Considering a potentially higher rate of LPVT after PHVE, PVE might be preferred in patients with moderate baseline sFRLV, with optional sequential HVE in non-sufficient responders.