russian wheat aphid
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

425
(FIVE YEARS 13)

H-INDEX

35
(FIVE YEARS 1)

Author(s):  
Nahil Abebe ◽  
Mulugeta Negeri ◽  
Emana Getu ◽  
Thangavel Selvara

Background: Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) is an important cereal crop as being consumed as staple food in the world as well as in Ethiopia. The production of wheat in Ethiopia decreased due to the incidence of insect pests. Out of insects’ pests the Russian wheat aphid (Diuraphis noxia) is the recent one that causes yield loss either directly or indirectly. Methods: The experiment was carried out at selected districts of West Showa zone, Ethiopia during off cropping season 2019 to evaluate the yield reduction in wheat crop due to the invasion of Russian wheat aphids. Malamar, Dimethoate, neem seeds, leaves, Beaveria bassiana and Metarhizium anisopliae were used in form of spray. Result: However, Malamar and Dimethoate highly significantly lowered the population of Diuraphis noxia. The combination of Beaveria bassiana and Metarhizium anisopleae significantly lowered the population of Russian wheat aphid. The combination of Neem leaf and Neem seeds, as well as Beaveria bassiana, proved to be effective against Russian wheat aphid yet they were protected and sound against the environments. Malamar showed the maximum decrease in Diuraphis noxia populations followed by Dimethoate, the combination of Beaveria bassiana and Metarhizium anisopleae.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Astrid Jankielsohn

Russian wheat aphid (RWA) is an international pest on wheat and occurs in most countries where large scale wheat cultivation is practiced. Consequently, considerable efforts have been made to manage RWA globally. The two management options used currently are chemical control and breeding for deployment of resistant wheat cultivars. There are however drawbacks to both of these management practices. Chemical control has a negative impact on the environment, especially other insect groups such as predators, pollinators and decomposers. With widespread and continuous use of the same active ingredients, there is the possibility that RWA can build up resistance against these specific active ingredients. The drawback with resistance breeding is that certain RWA populations can overcome the resistance in the wheat, resulting in new biotypes virulent to the resistant wheat cultivars.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (12) ◽  
pp. e0244455
Author(s):  
Lavinia Kisten ◽  
Vicki L. Tolmay ◽  
Isack Mathew ◽  
Scott L. Sydenham ◽  
Eduard Venter

Russian wheat aphid (RWA; Diuraphis noxia Kurdjumov) resistance on the 1D chromosome of wheat has been the subject of intensive research. Conversely, the deployment of the Dn4 derived RWA resistant varieties diminished in recent years due to the overcoming of the resistance it imparts in the United States of America. However, this resistance has not been deployed in South Africa despite reports that Dn4 containing genotypes exhibited varying levels of resistance against the South African RWA biotypes. It is possible that there may be certain genetic differences within breeding lines or cultivars that influence the expression of resistance. The aim of this study was to identify single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers associated with resistance to South African RWA biotypes. A panel of thirty-two wheat lines were phenotyped for RWA resistance using four South African RWA biotypes and a total of 181 samples were genotyped using the Illumina 9K SNP wheat chip. A genome wide association study using 7598 polymorphic SNPs showed that the population was clustered into two distinct subpopulations. Twenty-seven marker trait associations (MTA) were identified with an average linkage disequilibrium of 0.38 at 10 Mbp. Four of these markers were highly significant and three correlated with previously reported quantitative trait loci linked to RWA resistance in wheat. Twenty putative genes were annotated using the IWGSC RefSeq, three of which are linked to plant defence responses. This study identified novel chromosomal regions that contribute to RWA resistance and contributes to unravelling the complex genetics that control RWA resistance in wheat.


2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (21) ◽  
pp. 8271
Author(s):  
Vicki L. Tolmay ◽  
Scott L. Sydenham ◽  
Thandeka N. Sikhakhane ◽  
Bongiwe N. Nhlapho ◽  
Toi J. Tsilo

Russian wheat aphid, Diuraphis noxia (Kurdjumov), is a severe pest of wheat, Triticum aestivum L., throughout the world. Resistant cultivars are viewed as the most economical and environmentally viable control available. Studies to identify molecular markers to facilitate resistance breeding started in the 1990s, and still continue. This paper reviews and discusses the literature pertaining to the D. noxia R-genes on chromosome 7D, and markers reported to be associated with them. Individual plants with known phenotypes from a panel of South African wheat accessions are used as examples. Despite significant inputs from various research groups over many years, diagnostic markers for resistance to D. noxia remain elusive. Factors that may have impeded critical investigation, thus blurring the accumulation of a coherent body of information applicable to Dn resistance, are discussed. This review calls for a more fastidious approach to the interpretation of results, especially considering the growing evidence pointing to the complex regulation of aphid resistance response pathways in plants. Appropriate reflection on prior studies, together with emerging knowledge regarding the complexity and specificity of the D. noxia–wheat resistance interaction, should enable scientists to address the challenges of protecting wheat against this pest in future.


2020 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
L.F. Motholo ◽  
M. Booyse ◽  
J.L. Hatting ◽  
T.J. Tsilo ◽  
O.M.M. Thekisoe

Crop Science ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 60 (4) ◽  
pp. 1782-1788
Author(s):  
Gary J. Puterka ◽  
Xiangyang Xu ◽  
Genqiao Li ◽  
Brett F. Carver ◽  
Peiguo Guo

2020 ◽  
Vol 45 (2) ◽  
pp. 369
Author(s):  
Darren M. Cockrell ◽  
Terri L. Randolph ◽  
Cynthia B. Walker ◽  
Rachael Sitz ◽  
Scott D. Haley ◽  
...  

Crop Science ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 60 (3) ◽  
pp. 1428-1435
Author(s):  
Xiangyang Xu ◽  
Genqiao Li ◽  
Brett F. Carver ◽  
Gary Puterka

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document