model precipitation
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

65
(FIVE YEARS 16)

H-INDEX

17
(FIVE YEARS 2)

Author(s):  
Maria Fernanda R. Pereima ◽  
Pedro L. B. Chaffe ◽  
Pablo Borges Amorim ◽  
Regina R. Rodrigues

Author(s):  
Pin-Lun Li ◽  
Chia-Jeng Chen ◽  
Liao-Fan Lin

AbstractSatellite and model precipitation such as the Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) data are valuable in hydrometeorological applications. This study investigates the performance of various satellite and model precipitation products in Taiwan from 2015 to 2017, including data derived from the Integrated Multi-satellitE Retrievals for GPM Early and Final Runs (IMERG_E and IMERG_F), Global Satellite Mapping of Precipitation_near-real-time (GSMaP_NRT), and the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model. We assess these products by comparing them against data collected from 304 surface stations and gauge-based gridded data. Our assessment emphasizes factors influential in precipitation estimation, such as season, temperature, elevation, and extreme event. Further, we assess the hydrological response to each precipitation product via continuous flow simulation in two selected watersheds. The results indicate that the performance of these precipitation products is subject to seasonal and regional variations. The satellite products (i.e., IMERG and GSMaP) perform better than the model (i.e., WRF) in the warm season and vice versa in the cold season, most apparently in northern Taiwan. For selected extreme events, WRF can simulate better rainfall amount and distribution. The seasonal and regional variations in precipitation estimation are also reflected in flow simulation: IMERG in general produces the most rational flow simulation, GSMaP tends to overestimate and be least useful for hydrological applications, while WRF simulates high flows that show accurate time to the peak flows and are better in the southern watershed.


2021 ◽  
Vol 35 ◽  
pp. 100815
Author(s):  
Charles Gyamfi ◽  
Jacob Zora-Oni Tindan ◽  
Gislar Edgar Kifanyi

Author(s):  
Victor B. Moreto ◽  
Glauco de S. Rolim ◽  
João T. Esteves ◽  
Eline Vanuytrecht ◽  
Sin Chan Chou

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
George Tselioudis ◽  
Jasmine Remillard

<p>In order to understand the mechanisms determining precipitation variability and to evaluate model skill in simulating those mechanisms, it is important to partition the precipitation field into regimes that include distinct sets of processes. In the past, dynamic fields like omega and SLP have been used to define regimes and study cloud, radiation, and precipitation variability. More recently, cloud-defined weather states were derived and used for similar analyses. Here, we apply a new cloud-defined Weather State dataset derived from the higher-resolution ISCCP-H data to examine precipitation variability at global scales and evaluate CMIP6 model precipitation simulations . In addition, precipitation partitioning using mid-tropospheric vertical velocity is performed, and the differences between the results of the two compositing methodologies are discussed.</p>


2020 ◽  
Vol 231 ◽  
pp. 104671
Author(s):  
Yanmin Lv ◽  
Jianping Guo ◽  
Steve Hung-Lam Yim ◽  
Yuxing Yun ◽  
Jinfang Yin ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 124 (24) ◽  
pp. 14220-14239 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Bannister ◽  
Andrew Orr ◽  
Sanjay K. Jain ◽  
Ian P. Holman ◽  
Andrea Momblanch ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document