Precipitation data with fine quality plays vital roles in hydrological-related applications. In this study, we choose the high-quality China Merged Precipitation Analysis data (CMPA) as the benchmark for evaluating four satellite-based precipitation products (PERSIANN-CCS, FY4A QPE, GSMap_Gauge, IMERG-Final) and one model-based precipitation product (ERA5-Land), respectively, at 0.1°, hourly scales over the Zhejiang province, China, in summer, from June to August 2019. The main conclusions were as follows—(1) all other products demonstrate similar patterns with CMPA (~325.60 mm/h, std ~0.07 mm/h), except FY4A QPE (~281.79 mm/h, std ~0.18 mm/h), while, overall, the PERSIANN-CCS underestimates the precipitation against CMPA with a mean value around 236.29 mm/h (std ~0.06 mm/h), and the ERA5-Land, GSMap_Guage, and IMERG-Final generally overestimate the precipitation with a mean value around 370.00 mm/h (std ~0.06 mm/h). (2) The GSMap_Gauge outperforms IMERG-Final against CMPA with CC ~0.50 and RMSE ~1.51 mm/h, and CC ~0.48 and RMSE ~1.64 mm/h, respectively. (3) The PERSIANN-CCS significantly underestimates the precipitation (CC ~0.26, bias ~−35.03%, RMSE ~1.81 mm/h, probability of detection, POD, ~0.33, false alarm ratio, FAR, ~0.47), potentially due to its weak abilities to capture precipitation events and estimate the precipitation. (4) Though ERA5-Land has the best ability to capture precipitation events (POD ~0.78), the largest misjudgments (FAR ~0.54) result in its great uncertainties with CC ~ 0.39, which performs worse than those of GSMap_Gauge and IMERG-Final. (5) The ranking of precipitation products, in terms of the general evaluation metrics, over Zhejiang province is GSMap_Gauge, IMERG-Final, ERA5-Land, PERSIANN-CCS, and FY4A QPE, which provides valuable recommendations for applying these products in various related application fields.
Impact of Assimilating China Precipitation Analysis Data Merging with Remote Sensing Products Using the 4DVar Method on the Prediction of Heavy Rainfall
