Multi-Monostatic Interferometric Radar for Bridge Monitoring

In recent years, interferometric radar has been extensively used as a sensor for static and dynamic monitoring of bridges. Generally speaking, a radar can only detect displacement components along the view direction. As the movement of a real bridge or of a large structure can be rather complex, this limitation can be a significant drawback in engineering practice. In order to overcome this limitation, in this article, a multi-monostatic radar for retrieving the displacement vector is proposed. It is basically a multiple input, multiple output (MIMO) interferometric radar, equipped with a transponder that consists of a pair of antennae, with relative amplifiers, connected to the radar with a radiofrequency (RF) cable. This arrangement allows for the simultaneous detection of two independent displacement components. The radar was successfully tested both in a controlled environment and in the field on a real bridge crossing the Arno river in Florence, Italy.

A hypothetical reconstruction of Hallucigenia

Hallucigenia is an odd genus of Early Cambrian lobopod whose history is fraught with changes. Presented in this article are four reconstructions showing the three known species of Hallucigenia in further detail; culminating research into single reconstructions. A wrinkled cuticula scattered with tiny papillae is suggested for all species; a pair of antennae suggested for H. sparsa and H. hongmeia; fine anterior appendages lined with hair-like setae suggested for all species as an adaptation for filter feeding. Inferences on diet and method of feeding can be made. Further anatomical connections are made between Hallucigenia and Onychophora.

A hypothetical reconstruction of Hallucigenia

Hallucigenia is an odd genus of Early Cambrian lobopod whose history is fraught with changes. Presented in this article are four reconstructions showing the three known species of Hallucigenia in further detail; culminating research into single reconstructions. A wrinkled cuticula scattered with tiny papillae is suggested for all species; a pair of antennae suggested for H. sparsa and H. hongmeia; fine anterior appendages lined with hair-like setae suggested for all species as an adaptation for filter feeding. Inferences on diet and method of feeding can be made. Further anatomical connections are made between Hallucigenia and Onychophora.

A conserved genetic mechanism specifies deutocerebral appendage identity in insects and arachnids

The segmental architecture of the arthropod head is one of the most controversial topics in the evolutionary developmental biology of arthropods. The deutocerebral (second) segment of the head is putatively homologous across Arthropoda, as inferred from the segmental distribution of the tripartite brain and the absence of Hox gene expression of this anterior-most, appendage-bearing segment. While this homology statement implies a putative common mechanism for differentiation of deutocerebral appendages across arthropods, experimental data for deutocerebral appendage fate specification are limited to winged insects. Mandibulates (hexapods, crustaceans and myriapods) bear a characteristic pair of antennae on the deutocerebral segment, whereas chelicerates (e.g. spiders, scorpions, harvestmen) bear the eponymous chelicerae. In such hexapods as the fruit fly, Drosophila melanogaster , and the cricket, Gryllus bimaculatus , cephalic appendages are differentiated from the thoracic appendages (legs) by the activity of the appendage patterning gene homothorax ( hth ). Here we show that embryonic RNA interference against hth in the harvestman Phalangium opilio results in homeonotic chelicera-to-leg transformations, and also in some cases pedipalp-to-leg transformations. In more strongly affected embryos, adjacent appendages undergo fusion and/or truncation, and legs display proximal defects, suggesting conservation of additional functions of hth in patterning the antero-posterior and proximo-distal appendage axes. Expression signal of anterior Hox genes labial , proboscipedia and Deformed is diminished, but not absent, in hth RNAi embryos, consistent with results previously obtained with the insect G. bimaculatus . Our results substantiate a deep homology across arthropods of the mechanism whereby cephalic appendages are differentiated from locomotory appendages.

A new study of Marrella splendens (Arthropoda, Marrellomorpha) from the Middle Cambrian Burgess Shale, British Columbia, Canada

Study of over 1000 specimens of Marrella splendens Walcott, 1912, out of the more than 9000 collected by the Royal Ontario Museum (ROM) since 1975, has produced new information on the anatomy, functional morphology, and behaviour of this most common arthropod in the Burgess Shale fauna. Among the new features recognized is the distinction between the alimentary canal and circulatory system; where the former is generally three-dimensional and slightly reflective, the latter never presents any relief and is very reflective. A larger range of size is now known, from 2.4 to 24.5 mm in length, with small individuals possessing 17 body segments to large specimens with more than 26 body segments, representing an almost complete ontogenetic series. The second pair of "antennae" is now interpreted as swimming appendages, since the five distal segments are dorsoventrally compressed, fringed with setae and with a considerable blood supply, providing a paddlelike appendage capable of producing a considerable propelling force. The ROM collections extend the geographical distribution of Marrella 13 km to the southeast and the stratigraphical range through the lowest five members of the Burgess Shale Formation.

Rare arthropods from the Burgess Shale, Middle Cambrian, British Columbia

Six species of arthropods from the Walcott Collection, U.S. National Museum, are described. Molaria spinifera Walcott is known from over 100 specimens, a sample that reveals the morphology fairly fully. Between one and 12 specimens of the other species are known, and yield limited information. M. spinifera had a smooth, convex exoskeleton, not trilobed, the cephalic shield being a quarter-sphere in shape, eight trunk tergites diminishing in size posteriorly and the cylindrical telson having a short ventral spine and a long, jointed posterior spine. The cephalon bore a pair of short, slim antennae and three pairs of biramous appendages. There were eight pairs of similar biramous appendages on the trunk. The biramous appendage had a large basal podomere, a segmented inner walking branch, and a lobate outer branch arising from the basal podomere and bearing marginal lamellae. The sagittal length of cephalon, trunk and telson ranged from 8 to 26 mm, the posterior spine slightly exceeding this length; the smallest specimens are similar to the largest. The animal lacked eyes, and was probably benthic and may have been a scavenger and deposit feeder. Habelia optata Walcott was superficially similar to M . spinfera , the trunk being of 12 tergites; there was no cylindrical telson, but a ridged and barbed spine inserted into the 12th tergite, the spine having a joint at about two-thirds its length. The external surface of the exoskeleton was tuberculate; the pleurae of the tergites curved back increasingly strongly posteriorly, the tips being spinose. The cephalon appears to have borne a slim, short pair of antennae and two pairs of biramous appendages; the proximal portions of the jointed inner branches may have been adapted for grinding food. The first six trunk somites bore biramous limbs, the inner branch being a relatively long walking leg, the outer a lobe having marginal lamellae; on the posterior trunk somites there is no trace of the inner branch, but the outer was present. H. optata lacked eyes and was probably a benthic animal. Only the smooth exoskeleton of a possible second species, H? brevicauda Simonetta, is known, of which the posterior spine is short and bluntly rounded. The new genus and species Sarotrocercus oblita is erected for a few specimens, in which the body is about 1 cm in length, and behind which is a slim spine having a group of spines at the tip. From beneath the anterolateral margin of the cephalic shield a large eye projected, and the cephalon bore also one pair of large, jointed appendages. Behind these were pairs of lobed appendages bearing marginal lamellae, one on the cephalon and one on each of the nine trunk somites. This small species may have drifted and swum in the higher water layers, the occasional carcass lying on the sea bottom having been preserved. The single specimen of Actaeus armatus Simonetta is over 6 cm in length. The exoskeleton of this specimen is divided into cephalic shield with marginal eye lobe, 11 trunk tergites and a triangular terminal plate. The anterior cephalic appendage was Leanchoil -like, the stout proximal portion being curved and ending in a group of claws, the next two podomeres bearing long, slim extensions. The head shield also bore three pairs of biramous appendages, consisting of a small jointed inner branch and a large lobed outer branch with marginal lamellae; appendages like these outer branches are preserved beneath the trunk tergites. Only two specimens are identified as Alalcomenaeus cambricus Simonetta (length 3-4 cm). The exoskeleton is divisible into cephalic shield, trunk of probably 12 tergites, and an ovate terminal plate which has lateral bands. The cephalon has a marginal eye lobe and an anterior appendage which is broad proximally, the long distal portion being slim. The holotype shows a series of lobed appendages, the first three cephalic. Between them project the curved, pointed terminations of inner branches. The second specimen suggests that these lobed appendages bore marginal filaments, and reveals the inner branches as blade-shaped, and spinose on the inward-facing margin. These biramous appendages were present on all the trunk somites, being largest anteriorly. These remarkable appendages suggest a benthic scavenger, able to hold on to, and tear up, a carcass. ‘ Leanchoilia protogonia ’ Simonetta is most probably a composite, a poorly preserved Leanchoilia superlata lying on an unidentified, branching organism. The five species showing appendages extend greatly the known range of variation in morphology of the Burgess Shale arthropods. Affinities are discussed, but familial and higher classification is postponed, pending completion of work on all the arthropods from the shale.

XV. On the development of the parasitic isopoda

The following paper contains an account of observations on the development of the species Cymothoa œstroides and C . parallela of Milne Edwards; but the forms of the young seem to show that several species are really included under these two names. In the early stages of development the only observable difference that exists between the embryos is one of size, but in the later stages they differ very markedly from each other in their external characters. From adult individuals answering the description of C . œstroides I have obtained four varieties of embryos: two with long antennae and two with short.* In the two former the first pair of antennae are but slightly longer than the head, while the second pair are longer than the body; the eyes are small. In one of the varieties thus characterised the abdominal appendages are fringed with long hairs (fig. 20), and in the other they are smooth.

XI. On the organ of hearing in crustacea

Although the existence of an organ of hearing in the class Crustacea has not altogether escaped the observation of anatomists, yet the descriptions which have been hitherto given of that structure have stopped short at the point where the in­terest of the subject begins. For while some general analogies have been traced between its more prominent and obvious parts, and those of the organ of hearing in other classes, the essential features in this remarkable piece of mechanism, as deve­loped by the aid of the microscope, have been quite overlooked. It is my object to supply this deficiency in the following account of some dissections which were com­menced many years ago, when my attention was more particularly directed to com­parative anatomy. But first it is important to point out an error which has arisen from the confusion of two separate and distinct organs situated, the one at the base of the larger or second pair of antennæ, and the other at the base of the smaller or first pair, to each of which the function of an organ of hearing has been assigned by different ana­tomists.