california grasslands
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

44
(FIVE YEARS 3)

H-INDEX

14
(FIVE YEARS 0)

Oecologia ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erin J. Questad ◽  
Robert L. Fitch ◽  
Joshua Paolini ◽  
Eliza Hernández ◽  
Katharine N. Suding


Author(s):  
Tien-Hao Liao ◽  
Seung-Bum Kim ◽  
Alexander L. Handwerger ◽  
Eric J. Fielding




Madroño ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 67 (1) ◽  
pp. 9
Author(s):  
Friederike Schellenberg ◽  
Irina C. Irvine ◽  
Martha S. Witter ◽  
Anders Taeroe Nielsen ◽  
Karsten Raulund-Rasmussen


Diversity ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 71 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katharine L. Stuble ◽  
Truman P. Young

Priority effects can be used to promote target species during restoration. Early planting can provide an advantage over later-arriving species, increasing abundance of these early-arrivers in restored communities. However, we have limited knowledge of the indirect impacts of priority effects in restoration. In particular, we do not understand how priority effects impact non-target species. Of particular conservation concern is how these priority effects influence establishment by non-native species. We use a field-based mesocosm experiment to explore the impacts of priority effects on both target and non-target species in California grasslands. Specifically, we seeded native grasses and forbs, manipulating order of arrival by planting them at the same time, planting forbs one year before grasses, planting grasses one year before forbs, or planting each functional group alone. While our study plots were tilled and weeded for the first year, the regional species pool was heavily invaded. We found that, while early-arrival of native grasses did not promote establishment of non-native species, giving priority to native forbs ultimately left our restoration mesocosms vulnerable to invasion by non-native species. This suggests that, in some cases, establishment of non-native species may be an unintended consequence of using priority treatments as a restoration tool.



2020 ◽  
Vol 29 (9) ◽  
pp. 832
Author(s):  
Kea H. Rutherford ◽  
Rand R. Evett ◽  
Peter Hopkinson

Over the last century, northern coastal scrub has encroached into open grasslands along the central California coast, increasing fire risk in coastal wildland–urban interfaces. Understanding prehistoric ecological conditions is crucial for fire mitigation projects. Current estimates of these conditions in coastal California grasslands and shrublands are largely speculative because tree ring data, lake sediment evidence and ethnographic information are sparse. Phytolith analysis is an alternative palaeoecological tool that has been successfully used to reconstruct the extent of prehistoric grass cover in California. Our study uses phytolith analysis of soil samples from the East Bay hills of the San Francisco Bay region as a novel approach to estimate prehistoric grassland distribution and infer fire frequency in central coastal California. Our data strongly indicate that many areas in the region were dominated by perennial bunchgrasses for at least several hundred years before European contact. Because grass-dominated grasslands in the East Bay hills are disturbance-dependent, our data suggest prehistoric fire frequency was of the order of 5 years or less in the region. Phytolith analysis is a useful technique for prehistoric fire regime reconstruction for grasslands and shrublands worldwide, leading to improved, data-based land management.



Ecosystems ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 754-766 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yang Lin ◽  
Eric W. Slessarev ◽  
Scott T. Yehl ◽  
Carla M. D’Antonio ◽  
Jennifer Y. King


2017 ◽  
Vol 107 (4) ◽  
pp. 640-659 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Laris ◽  
Sean Brennan ◽  
Kyra Engelberg


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document