The Agile Success Model

Organizations are increasingly adopting Agile frameworks for their internal software development. Cost reduction, rapid deployment, requirements and mental model alignment are typical reasons for an Agile transformation. This article presents an in-depth field study of a large-scale Agile transformation in a mission-critical environment, where stakeholders’ commitment was a critical success factor. The goal of such a transformation was to implement mission-oriented features, reducing costs and time to operate in critical scenarios. The project lasted several years and involved over 40 professionals. We report how a hierarchical and plan-driven organization exploited Agile methods to develop a Command & Control (C2) system. Accordingly, we first abstract our experience, inducing a success model of general use for other comparable organizations by performing a post-mortem study. The goal of the inductive research process was to identify critical success factors and their relations. Finally, we validated and generalized our model through Partial Least Squares - Structural Equation Modelling, surveying 200 software engineers involved in similar projects. We conclude the article with data-driven recommendations concerning the management of Agile projects.

Spectral bias and task-model alignment explain generalization in kernel regression and infinitely wide neural networks

A theoretical understanding of generalization remains an open problem for many machine learning models, including deep networks where overparameterization leads to better performance, contradicting the conventional wisdom from classical statistics. Here, we investigate generalization error for kernel regression, which, besides being a popular machine learning method, also describes certain infinitely overparameterized neural networks. We use techniques from statistical mechanics to derive an analytical expression for generalization error applicable to any kernel and data distribution. We present applications of our theory to real and synthetic datasets, and for many kernels including those that arise from training deep networks in the infinite-width limit. We elucidate an inductive bias of kernel regression to explain data with simple functions, characterize whether a kernel is compatible with a learning task, and show that more data may impair generalization when noisy or not expressible by the kernel, leading to non-monotonic learning curves with possibly many peaks.

Towards a Systematic Derivation of an Analysis Model From Business Process Models in the Context of Model-Driven Architecture

The necessity of aligning an enterprise's information system (IS) model to its business process (BP) model is incontestable to the consistent analysis of the business performance. However, the main difficulty of establishing/maintaining BP-IS model alignment stems from the dissimilarities in the knowledge of the information system developers and the business process experts. To overcome these limits, the authors propose a model-driven architecture compliant methodology that helps software analysts to build an IS analysis model aligned to a given BP model. The proposed methodology allows mastering transformation from computation independent model to platform independent model. The CIM level expresses the BP, which is modelled through the standard BPMN and, at the PIM level represents the aligned IS model, which is generated as use case diagram, system sequence diagrams, and class diagram. CIM to PIM transformation accounts for the BP structural and semantic perspectives to generate an aligned IS model that respects the best-practice granularity level and the quality of UML diagrams.

Misalignment of selection, plasticity, and among-individual variation: A test of theoretical predictions with Peromyscus maniculatus.

Genetic variation and phenotypic plasticity are predicted to align with selection surfaces, a prediction that has rarely been empirically tested. Understanding the relationship between sources of phenotypic variation, i.e. genetic variation and plasticity, with selection surfaces improves our ability to predict a population's ability to adapt to a changing environment and our understanding of how selection has shaped phenotypes. Here, we estimated the (co)variances among three different behaviors (activity, aggression, and anti-predator response) in a natural population of deer mice (Peromyscus maniculatus). Using multi-response generalized mixed effects models, we divided the phenotypic covariance matrix into among- and within-individual matrices. The among-individual covariances includes genetic and permanent environmental covariances (e.g. developmental plasticity) and is predicted to align with selection. Simultaneously, we estimated the within-individual (co)variances, which include reversible phenotypic plasticity. To determine whether genetic variation, plasticity and selection align in multivariate space we calculated the dimensions containing the greatest among-individual variation and the dimension in which most plasticity was expressed (i.e. the dominant eigenvector for the among- and within-individual covariance matrices respectively). We estimated selection coefficients based on survival estimates from a mark-recapture model. Alignment between the dominant eigenvectors of behavioural variation and the selection gradient was estimated by calculating the angle between them, with an angle of 0 indicating perfect alignment. The angle between vectors ranged from 68 to 89, indicating that genetic variation, phenotypic plasticity, and selection are misaligned in this population. This misalignment could be due to the behaviors being close to their fitness optima, which is supported by low evolvabilities, or because of low selection pressure on these behaviors.

PARTICIPATORY IMAGE-BASED MODELS’ ALIGNMENT FOR RECONSTRUCTING A LARGE-SCALE INDOOR MAPPING

In this paper, we introduced a recently developed image-based model alignment technique for 3D reconstruction of large-scale indoor corridors. The proposed participatory model alignment technique enables crowd source single image-based modeling since it allows various participants to incorporate their images taken from different cameras for large-scale indoor mapping. This technique is robust against changes of camera orientation and prevents miss-association of a newly generated 3D model to the previously integrated models. To investigate the possibility of aligning two individual 3D models, their respective corridor topological graphs must match, and they need to geometrically transform into the same object space. Here 3D affine transformation is applied, and the transformation parameters are estimated through corresponding vertices of both 3D models. Having integrated two models in the same 3D space, they will be back projected into the image space for evaluation using Direct Linear Transformation. Note that the proposed method performs layout model matching in image space and considers information including layout topology and geometry as well as image information to address model alignment. The advantages of using layout information in the proposed alignment technique are twofold. First, a metric constraint is imposed to insure topological model consistency and balance 3D models scale issues. Second, it will reduce alignment ambiguity related to indoor corridor scenes, where the scene is enriched with multiple structural elements including various corridors junctions. To evaluate the performance of the proposed method, we have performed the experiments on a data set collected from Ross building corridors at York University. This dataset includes single images captured by a handheld wide-angle camera. The obtained results present the ability of the proposed method in alignment of single image-based 3D models while producing limited geometric errors.

Learning Models of Sequential Decision-Making with Partial Specification of Agent Behavior

Artificial agents that interact with other (human or artificial) agents require models in order to reason about those other agents’ behavior. In addition to the predictive utility of these models, maintaining a model that is aligned with an agent’s true generative model of behavior is critical for effective human-agent interaction. In applications wherein observations and partial specification of the agent’s behavior are available, achieving model alignment is challenging for a variety of reasons. For one, the agent’s decision factors are often not completely known; further, prior approaches that rely upon observations of agents’ behavior alone can fail to recover the true model, since multiple models can explain observed behavior equally well. To achieve better model alignment, we provide a novel approach capable of learning aligned models that conform to partial knowledge of the agent’s behavior. Central to our approach are a factored model of behavior (AMM), along with Bayesian nonparametric priors, and an inference approach capable of incorporating partial specifications as constraints for model learning. We evaluate our approach in experiments and demonstrate improvements in metrics of model alignment.