Long-Term Outcomes of Lymph Node Transfer in Secondary Lymphedema and Its Correlation with Flap Characteristics

Background: This retrospective study aimed to assess the impact of certain flap characteristics on long-term outcomes following microsurgical treatment in Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema (BCRL) patients. Methods: Sixty-four out of 65 BCRL patients, guided by the “Selected Lymph Node” (“SeLyN”) technique, underwent Vascularized Lymph Node Transfer (VLNT) between 2012 and 2018. According to their surface size, flaps were divided into small (<25 cm2, n = 32) and large (>25 cm2, n = 32). Twelve large and six small flaps were combined with free abdominally based breast reconstruction procedures. Lymphedema stage, flap size, vascular pedicle and number of lymph nodes (LNs) were analyzed in correlation with long-term Volume Differential Reduction (VDR). Results: At 36-month follow-up, no major complication was recorded in 64 cases; one flap failure was excluded from the study. Mean flap size was 27.4 cm2, mean LNs/flap 3.3 and mean VDR 55.7%. Small and large flaps had 2.8 vs. 3.8 LNs/flap (p = 0.001), resulting in 49.6% vs. 61.8% VDR (p = 0.032), respectively. Lymphedema stage and vascular pedicle (SIEA or SCIA/SCIP) had no significant impact on VDR. Conclusion: In our series, larger flaps included a higher number of functional LNs, directly associated with better outcomes as quantified by improved VDR.

Novel Wireless Bioimpedance Device for Segmental Lymphedema Analysis Post Dual-Site Free Vascularized Lymph Node Transfer: A Prospective Cohort Study

An innovative wireless device for bioimpedance analysis was developed for post-dual-site free vascularized lymph node transfer (VLNT) evaluation. Seven patients received dual-site free VLNT for unilateral upper or lower limb lymphedema. A total of 10 healthy college students were enrolled in the healthy control group. The device was applied to the affected and unaffected limbs to assess segmental alterations in bioimpedance. The affected proximal limb showed a significant increase in bioimpedance at postoperative sixth month (3.3 [2.8, 3.6], p = 0.001) with 10 kHz currents for better penetration, although the difference was not significant (3.3 [3.3, 3.8]) at 1 kHz. The bioimpedance of the affected distal limb significantly increased after dual-site free VLNT surgery, whether passing with the 1 kHz (1.6 [0.7, 3.4], p = 0.030, postoperative first month; 2.8 [1.0, 4.2], p = 0.027, postoperative third month; and 1.3 [1.3, 3.4], p = 0.009, postoperative sixth month) or 10 kHz current ((1.4 [0.5, 2.7], p = 0.049, postoperative first month; 3.2 [0.9, 6.3], p = 0.003, postoperative third month; and 3.6 [2.5, 4.1], p < 0.001, postoperative sixth month). Bioimpedance alterations on the affected distal limb were significantly correlated with follow-up time (rho = 0.456, p = 0.029 detected at 10 kHz). This bioimpedance wireless device could quantitatively monitor the interstitial fluid alterations, which is suitable for postoperative real-time surveillance.

Axilla versus Wrist as the Recipient Site in Vascularized Lymph Node Transfer for Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background Vascularized lymph node transfers (VLNT) are being used with increasing frequency for the treatment of breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL). However, there is a lack of consensus in the surgical field as to which recipient site should be utilized. We, therefore, aim to assess the evidence comparing the wrist and axilla as recipient sites for VLNT in BCRL. Methods We conducted a systematic literature review to compare the wrist and axilla as recipient sites for VLNT in BCRL. Demographic data, as well as circumference reduction rate (CRR), excess volume reduction (EVR), postoperative decrease in infections per year, postoperative discontinuation of compression garments, and overall pooled complication rate were extracted from included studies. These were compared through a meta-analysis. Results A total of 37 studies met the inclusion criteria for a total of 689 patients. VLNTs to the wrist and axilla resulted in a decrease in CRR of 42.1 and 51.5%, and a decrease in EVR of 35.6 and 48.8%, respectively. However, our meta-analysis showed no significant differences between CRR or EVR and between wrist and axilla as recipient sites. Similarly, we found no differences in postoperative decrease in infections per year, postoperative discontinuation of compression garments, and overall pooled complication rate. Conclusion These data suggest noninferiority between the wrist and axilla as recipient sites for VLNT in the context of BCRL. In the absence of randomized, prospective data, we hope these results can be used as an evidence-based reference and facilitate future studies.

Lympedema Therapies

Secondary lymphedema refers to a condition in which the affected extremity develops progressive hypertrophy due to lymphatic fluid retention. Worldwide, secondary lymphedema is most often associated with parasitic infection; within the United States, secondary lymphedema is most often caused by surgical disruption of the lymphatic drainage basins due to cancer surgery and/or radiation. For patients with lymphedema secondary to parasitic infection, treatment of the offending infectious organism (Wuchereria bancroftii) is critical. For patients with surgical disruption of the lymphatic drainage basin(s), patients are first managed non-operatively with compression and manual lymphatic drainage massage. Over the past decade, surgical techniques have been developed and implemented to improve lymphatic drainage for patients with post-surgical secondary lymphedema. These procedures, including lymphovenous bypass or vascularized lymph node transfer, are aimed at reconstituting lymphatic drainage and reducing lymphatic retention to alleviate early lymphedema. An appreciation of the underlying physiology responsible for secondary lymphedema, and diagnosis and management is required to provide timely and appropriate care for these patients. This review contains 2 tables, 4 figures, and 32 references Keywords: lymphedema, lymphedema treatment, secondary lymphedema, complete decongestive therapy, lymphovenous bypass, vascularized lymph node transplantation, debulking surgery, ICG lymphangiography, lymphedema staging