little penguin
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

85
(FIVE YEARS 8)

H-INDEX

20
(FIVE YEARS 1)

2021 ◽  
Vol 168 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Françoise Amélineau ◽  
Claire Saraux ◽  
Yan Ropert-Coudert ◽  
Akiko Kato ◽  
Keith A. Hobson ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Shaun P Collin ◽  
H Barry Collin

Abstract The ultrastructure of the nictitating membrane in the little penguin Eudyptula minor was studied using both scanning and transmission electron microscopy to improve our understanding of the function of ocular adnexa in diving birds. Following euthanasia, eyes were enucleated and immersion fixed in Karnovsky's fixative. The nictitating membrane and conjunctiva were embedded in araldite and semi- or ultra-thin sections were stained and photographed using compound and transmission electron microscopes, respectively. Ultrastructural dimensions were measured directly from digital photographs. Surface ultrastructure was examined using scanning electron microscopy. The transparent nictitating membrane consists of a dense stroma surrounded by epithelia on both the external (conjunctival) and internal (bulbar) surfaces. The conjunctival surface of the membrane near the leading edge is covered by microvilli, which transition to microplicae and finally to microridges in the periphery. Beneath the epithelial cells, there is a well-developed basement membrane. Scattered throughout this epithelium are a few goblet cells. The surface of the bulbar epithelium is covered by microvilli near the leading edge, which become denser peripherally. The stroma consists of densely-packed collagen fibrils, which are randomly oriented in bundles near the leading edge but are aligned in the same direction parallel with the epithelial and corneal surfaces and with the leading edge, when the membrane is extended. The ultrastructure of the nictitating membrane in the little penguin differs from other birds and its function is predominantly protective, while preserving clear vision in both water and air.


Animals ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (7) ◽  
pp. 1224
Author(s):  
Samantha J. Chiew ◽  
Kym L. Butler ◽  
Sally L. Sherwen ◽  
Grahame J. Coleman ◽  
Vicky Melfi ◽  
...  

Studies on the effects of visitors on zoo animals have shown mixed findings and as a result, the manner in which visitors affect zoo animals remains unclear for many species, including a rarely studied taxa such as penguins. Penguins are a common zoo-housed species and have been shown to display huddling, vigilance and avoidance towards zoo visitors which can be indicative of fear. Here, we examined the effects of covering one visitor viewing area window, out of four, on little penguin (Eudyptula minor) behaviours that may be indicative of fear. Two treatments were randomly imposed on different days: (1) The main visitor viewing area window, where most visitor-penguin interactions occurred, was uncovered (‘Main window uncovered’) and (2) The main visitor viewing area window was covered (‘Main window covered’). Penguin numbers and behaviour were recorded near the main visitor viewing area window and the three other visitor viewing area windows, as well as one area not visible to visitors (‘Corner’ area). Furthermore, visitor numbers and visitor behaviour were recorded at all four visitor viewing area windows. Covering the main visitor viewing area window reduced the proportion of visitors present at this window by about 85% (p < 0.001) and reduced potentially threatening visitor behaviours at this window such as tactile contact with the window, loud vocalisations and sudden movement (p < 0.05). When the main visitor viewing area window was covered, the proportion of penguins present increased by about 25% (p < 0.05), the proportion of visible penguins preening in the water increased by about 180% (p < 0.05) and the proportion of visible penguins vigilant decreased by about 70% (p < 0.05) in the area near this main window. A preference for the Corner area was also found whereby 59% and 49% of penguins were present in this area when the main window was uncovered and covered, respectively. These results provide limited evidence that the little penguins in this exhibit showed an aversion to the area near the main visitor viewing area window when it was uncovered based on the increased avoidance and vigilance and decreased preening in the water in this area. This suggests visitors may be fear-provoking for these little penguins. However, it is unclear whether visual contact with visitors per se or other aspects of visitor contact, such as visitor-induced sounds and vibrations, were responsible for this apparent aversion when this window was uncovered.


2020 ◽  
Vol 34 (8) ◽  
pp. 1626-1639
Author(s):  
Catherine Cavallo ◽  
André Chiaradia ◽  
Bruce E. Deagle ◽  
Graeme C. Hays ◽  
Simon Jarman ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Isabel Martínez ◽  
David Christie ◽  
Francesc Jutglar ◽  
Ernest Garcia
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
Vol 33 ◽  
pp. 101037 ◽  
Author(s):  
Junyeop Lee ◽  
Ji Han Han ◽  
Min Seong Kim ◽  
Hwan Seong Lee ◽  
Sang Yun Han ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Yin Yang ◽  

Animation ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 116-130
Author(s):  
Claire Shinhea Lee ◽  
Jihee Choi

This study examines the deeper cultural and social meaning of a South Korean popular edutainment animation Pororo the Little Penguin by analyzing 50 of its episodes. The article expands upon earlier studies of Pororo by not only analyzing gender stereotypes in Pororo’s narratives and aesthetics but also investigating these features within the larger frame of social discourse. The authors found that, despite the fact that Pororo seems to display friendship formation among children without adults’ intervention, it really reflects family relationships in South Korea and functions to reveal adults’ perspectives on them. Through positioning adult and children characters within the typical patriarchal Korean family, they argue that Pororo reproduces the patriarchal family ideology of today’s South Korea. This study therefore contributes to the field of children’s media and gender representation and the sociology of childhood.


The Auk ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 135 (1) ◽  
pp. 44-59 ◽  
Author(s):  
Diane Colombelli-Négrel ◽  
Rachel Smale

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document