seasonal adaptations
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

41
(FIVE YEARS 0)

H-INDEX

16
(FIVE YEARS 0)

Biology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (6) ◽  
pp. 130
Author(s):  
Carlo Breda ◽  
Ezio Rosato ◽  
Charalambos P. Kyriacou

In this paper, we review the role of the norpA-encoded phospholipase C in light and thermal entrainment of the circadian clock in Drosophila melanogaster. We extend our discussion to the role of norpA in the thermo-sensitive splicing of the per 3′ UTR, which has significant implications for seasonal adaptations of circadian behaviour. We use the norpA mutant-generated enhancement of per splicing and the corresponding advance that it produces in the morning (M) and evening (E) locomotor component to dissect out the neurons that are contributing to this norpA phenotype using GAL4/UAS. We initially confirmed, by immunocytochemistry and in situ hybridisation in adult brains, that norpA expression is mostly concentrated in the eyes, but we were unable to unequivocally reveal norpA expression in the canonical clock cells using these methods. In larval brains, we did see some evidence for co-expression of NORPA with PDF in clock neurons. Nevertheless, downregulation of norpA in clock neurons did generate behavioural advances in adults, with the eyes playing a significant role in the norpA seasonal phenotype at high temperatures, whereas the more dorsally located CRYPTOCHROME-positive clock neurons are the likely candidates for generating the norpA behavioural effects in the cold. We further show that knockdown of the related plc21C encoded phospholipase in clock neurons does not alter per splicing nor generate any of the behavioural advances seen with norpA. Our results with downregulating norpA and plc21C implicate the rhodopsins Rh2/Rh3/Rh4 in the eyes as mediating per 3′ UTR splicing at higher temperatures and indicate that the CRY-positive LNds, also known as ‘evening’ cells are likely mediating the low-temperature seasonal effects on behaviour via altering per 3′UTR splicing.



PLoS ONE ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (6) ◽  
pp. e0216679 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fatma Zohra Djazouli Alim ◽  
Elena V. Romanova ◽  
Yea-Ling Tay ◽  
Ahmad Yamin bin Abdul Rahman ◽  
Kok-Gan Chan ◽  
...  


2017 ◽  
Vol 187 (5-6) ◽  
pp. 827-834 ◽  
Author(s):  
Janina Bethge ◽  
Bianca Wist ◽  
Eleanor Stalenberg ◽  
Kathrin Dausmann
Keyword(s):  


2017 ◽  
Vol 88 ◽  
pp. 15-24 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ewa Szwejser ◽  
B.M. Lidy Verburg-van Kemenade ◽  
Magdalena Maciuszek ◽  
Magdalena Chadzinska


2015 ◽  
Vol 95 (7) ◽  
pp. 817-823
Author(s):  
A. Kh. Saulich ◽  
I. V. Sokolova ◽  
D. L. Musolin


Hydrobiologia ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 661 (1) ◽  
pp. 317-327 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joshua J. Ziarek ◽  
Ai Nihongi ◽  
Takeyoshi Nagai ◽  
Marco Uttieri ◽  
J. Rudi Strickler


2010 ◽  
Vol 39 (5) ◽  
pp. 1666-1675 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Dalin ◽  
Daniel W. Bean ◽  
Tom L. Dudley ◽  
Vanessa A. Carney ◽  
Debra Eberts ◽  
...  


2007 ◽  
Vol 139 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-44 ◽  
Author(s):  
H.V. Danks

AbstractThe many components of seasonal adaptations in insects are reviewed, especially from the viewpoint of aspects that must be studied in order to understand the structure and purposes of the adaptations. Component responses include dispersal, habitat selection, habitat modification, resistance to cold, dryness, and food limitation, trade-offs, diapause, modifications of developmental rate, sensitivity to environmental signals, life-cycle patterns including multiple alternatives in one species, and types of variation in phenology and development. Spatial, temporal, and resource elements of the environment are also reviewed, as are environmental signals, supporting the conclusion that further understanding of all of these seasonal responses requires detailed simultaneous study of the natural environments that drive the patterns of response.



Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document