source orientation
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

55
(FIVE YEARS 9)

H-INDEX

13
(FIVE YEARS 2)

2021 ◽  
Vol 149 (4) ◽  
pp. 2255-2269
Author(s):  
Henning Steffens ◽  
Steven van de Par ◽  
Stephan D. Ewert
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andre Pugin ◽  
Barbara Dietiker ◽  
Kevin Brewer ◽  
Timothy Cartwright

<p>In the vicinity of Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, we have recorded many multicomponent seismic data sets using an in-house multicom­ponent vibrator source named Microvibe and a landstreamer receiver array with 48 3-C 28-Hz geophones at 0.75-m intervals. The receiver spread length was 35.25 m, and the near-offset was 1.50 m. We used one, two or three source and three receiver orientations — vertical (V), inline-horizontal (H1), and transverse-horizontal (H2). We identified several reflection wave modes in the field records — PP, PS, SP, and SS, in addition to refracted waves, and Rayleigh-mode and Love-mode surface waves. We computed the semblance spectra of the selected shot records and ascertained the wave modes based on the semblance peaks. We then performed CMP stacking of each of the 9-C data sets using the PP and SS stacking velocities to compute PP and SS reflection profiles.</p><p>Despite the fact that any source type can generate any combination of wave modes — PP, PS, SP, and SS, partitioning of the source energy depends on the source orientation and VP/VS ratio. Our examples demonstrate that the most prominent PP reflection energy is recorded by the VV source-receiver orientation, whereas the most prominent SS reflection energy is recorded by the H2H2 source-receiver orientation with possibility to obtain decent shear wave near surface data in all other vibrating and receiving directions.</p><p>Pugin, Andre and Yilmaz, Öz, 2019. Optimum source-receiver orientations to capture PP, PS, SP, and SS reflected wave modes. The Leading Edge, vol. 38/1, p. 45-52. https://doi.org/10.1190/tle38010045.1</p>


2020 ◽  
Vol 222 (2) ◽  
pp. 1236-1244
Author(s):  
L Gassner ◽  
N Thiel ◽  
A Rietbrock

SUMMARY Subduction zones are the places on the Earth where the greatest earthquakes occur. It is now widely accepted that seismic asperities at the interface of subducting plates play a major role in whether a region of a subduction zone behaves seismically, creating strong earthquakes or exhibits aseismic slip. In the last decades, huge advances have been made to decipher the underlying processes; however, the physical parameters along the subduction zone interfaces are still not very well known due to a sparsity of high-resolution experiments and significant costs associated with amphibious seismic experiments. Therefore, synthetic tests are needed to investigate the potential of currently possible high density seismic deployments and to aid future experiment design. As standard local earthquake traveltime tomography in a subduction zone setting cannot resolve structures on a kilometre scale at depth, we explore the suitability of full-waveform inversion (FWI) to increase resolution by using amplitude and phase information in the recorded earthquake seismograms. We apply 2-D-elastic FWI to synthetic earthquake data, using vertical and horizontal receivers, and utilize a realistic model of the seismic velocities at the Ecuadorian margin. We add perturbations within the subducting plates of 4×4 km and 2×2 km in P- and S-wave velocities, respectively, such that potential crosstalk between the two models can be identified. Our results show that the location and amplitude of the perturbations can be reconstructed in high quality down to approximately 70 km depth. We find that the inversion of the S-wave velocity prior to the inversion of the P-wave velocity is necessary to guarantee a good reconstruction of both models; however, the spatial resolution of the S-wave model is superior to the P-wave model. We also show that frequencies up to 1 Hz are sufficient to achieve high resolution. Further tests demonstrate how results depend on the accuracy of the estimated source orientation. Resulting models do not suffer in quality as artefacts near the source positions compensate for the inaccuracy of source orientation. If sources are located within the subducted plate instead of beneath, resulting models are comparable and the convergence of the inversion scheme is sped up. The accuracy of the source position within the model compared to the true earthquake location is critical and implies that earthquake relocation during the inversion process is necessary, in a similar way as in local earthquake traveltime tomography.


2019 ◽  
Vol 1268 ◽  
pp. 012041
Author(s):  
M Lavrentiev ◽  
K Lysakov ◽  
An Marchuk ◽  
K Oblaukhov ◽  
M Shadrin

2018 ◽  
Vol 51 (4) ◽  
pp. 625-641 ◽  
Author(s):  
RA Mangkuto

A method for calculating scalar illuminance using cubic illuminance values in a light field has been proposed in the literature. This enables exact measurement of the illuminance vector direction and magnitude by a fixed device, as well as providing a useful basis for calculation. However, the method yields an inexact estimate of the scalar illuminance which in some cases may lead to errors. Two alternative approaches using the concept of mean spherical semi-cubic and cubic illuminances are proposed in this paper, to determine which of these approaches yields the highest accuracy, and to observe the effect of source orientation in various multiple point source configurations. Three types of test are introduced: the first involves two, three, and four identical point sources, separated by a varying angle θ; the second involves four identical point sources arranged symmetrically at varying azimuth angle ψ and incident angle α; the third involves 10,000 combinations of up to six point sources with random luminous intensities and in random positions. Comparisons between the three approaches show that the approach using mean spherical semi-cubic illuminances yields the least amount of error and thus the highest accuracy for scalar illuminance and vector/scalar illuminance ratio in the first and second test. In the third test, this approach also yields the highest accuracy, even though it tends to underestimate the scalar illuminance in scenes with more sources.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document