floral cues
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

17
(FIVE YEARS 4)

H-INDEX

8
(FIVE YEARS 1)

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hannah Burger ◽  
Nadine Joos ◽  
Manfred Ayasse

Oligolectic bees are highly dependent on the availability of the host plants to which they are specialized. Nevertheless, females of Chelostoma rapunculi have recently been monitored occasionally to visit Malva moschata and Geranium sanguineum flowers, in addition to their well-known Campanula spp. hosts. The questions therefore arise which floral cues promote visits to non-host plants. As host-specific floral cues are key attractants for oligolectic bees, we have studied the attractiveness of olfactory and visual cues of the established host Campanula trachelium in comparison to the non-host plants G. sanguineum and M. moschata in behavioral experiments. Chemical and electrophysiological analyses of the floral scent and spectral measurements of floral colors were used to compare and contrast host and non-host plants. The behavioral experiments showed that foraging-naïve bees, in particular, were attracted by olfactory cues of the non-host plants, and that they did not favor the Campanula host scent in choice experiments. Many electrophysiologically active floral volatiles were present in common in the studied plants, although each species produced an individual scent profile. Spiroacetals, the key components that enable C. rapunculi to recognize Campanula hosts, were detected in trace amounts in Geranium but could not be proved to occur in Malva. The visual floral cues of all species were particularly attractive for foraging-experienced bees. The high attractiveness of G. sanguineum and M. moschata flowers to C. rapunculi bees and the floral traits that are similar to the Campanula host plants can be a first step to the beginning of a host expansion or change which, however, rarely occurs in oligolectic bees.


2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (10) ◽  
pp. 1764-1770
Author(s):  
Hongfei Zhang ◽  
Weizheng Li ◽  
Yan Zhang ◽  
Guohui Yuan ◽  
Mingsheng Yang

The role of floral visual cues was studied in both sexes of three nocturnal scarab beetle species (Holotrichia oblita, Holotrichia parallela, and Anomala corpulenta). Flower patterns were designed using n-petal rose curve and radial gradient tools. Bioassay of plain colored patterns showed that both sexes of H. oblita and H. parallela preferred yellow and white. In contrast, A. corpulenta showed sexual differentiation in preferences. Comparison between given radial gradient patterns and their color components indicated that a radial gradient was necessary in both sexes of H. oblita rather than both sexes of H. parallela to elicit the highest response. Sexual differentiation was found in A. corpulenta. Among 4-, 8-, and 12-petaled patterns, the 4-petaled patterns were most preferred by all of the test insects, regardless of species and sex. Choice assays that provided both odor and visual cues suggest that olfaction may be the primary sensory modality in the three scarab species.


Insects ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. 304 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maryse Vanderplanck ◽  
Hélène Gilles ◽  
Denis Nonclercq ◽  
Pierre Duez ◽  
Pascal Gerbaux

Excessive pollen harvesting by bees can compromise the reproductive success of plants. Plants have therefore evolved different morphological structures and floral cues to narrow the spectrum of pollen feeding visitors. Among “filtering” mechanisms, the chemical and mechanical protection of pollen might shape bee-flower interactions and restrict pollen exploitation to a specific suite of visitors such as observed in Asteraceae. Asteraceae pollen is indeed only occasionally exploited by generalist bee species but plentifully foraged by specialist ones (i.e., Asteraceae paradox). During our bioassays, we observed that micro-colonies of generalist bumblebee (Bombus terrestris L.) feeding on Taraxacum pollen (Asteraceae) reduced their pollen collection and offspring production. Bees also experienced physiological effects of possible defenses in the form of digestive damage. Overall, our results suggest the existence of an effective chemical defense in Asteraceae pollen, while the hypothesis of a mechanical defense appeared more unlikely. Pre- and post-ingestive effects of such chemical defenses (i.e., nutrient deficit or presence of toxic compounds), as well as their role in the shaping of bee-flower interactions, are discussed. Our results strongly suggest that pollen chemical traits may act as drivers of plant selection by bees and partly explain why Asteraceae pollen is rare in generalist bee diets.


Author(s):  
Isadora Schulze-Albuquerque ◽  
Ana Carolina Galindo Da Costa ◽  
Paulo Milet-Pinheiro ◽  
Daniela Maria Do Amaral Ferraz Navarro ◽  
William Wayt Thomas ◽  
...  

Abstract Usually considered anemophilous, grasses (Poaceae) have been the subject of few studies that recorded insects visiting their flowers. Such visitors, with wind, could act as pollen vectors in a possible ambophilous system. Since colour and scent are floral cues attracting pollinating insects, we aimed to provide the first insights into how these cues could be involved in the attraction of pollinators by grasses. Chloris barbata, Paspalum maritimum (with two morphotypes), P. millegrana and Urochloa plantaginea were studied. We determined the role of each pollen vector (wind and insect) and we registered the frequency of floral visitors. Also, we characterized the colour reflectance of glumes, anthers and stigmas and we determined the colour space in the bee colour hexagon and the chemical composition of floral scents. The floral structures of each species reflect colour differently and are perceived differently by pollinators. Furthermore, the volatile organic compounds detected are similar to those found in entomophilous species. In two of the grass species, we registered eight species of visitors, including bees, wasps and flies. Overall, wind was the most important vector for reproductive success. Insects, however, may induce wind pollination by creating pollen clouds when they visit inflorescences.


2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel A. H. Peach ◽  
Regine Gries ◽  
Huimin Zhai ◽  
Nathan Young ◽  
Gerhard Gries
Keyword(s):  

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel A. H. Peach ◽  
Regine Gries ◽  
Huimin Zhai ◽  
Nathan Young ◽  
Gerhard Gries
Keyword(s):  

2017 ◽  
Vol 114 (50) ◽  
pp. 13218-13223 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karin Nordström ◽  
Josefin Dahlbom ◽  
V. S. Pragadheesh ◽  
Suhrid Ghosh ◽  
Amadeus Olsson ◽  
...  

With more than 80% of flowering plant species specialized for animal pollination, understanding how wild pollinators utilize resources across environments can encourage efficient planting and maintenance strategies to maximize pollination and establish resilience in the face of environmental change. A fundamental question is how generalist pollinators recognize “flower objects” in vastly different ecologies and environments. On one hand, pollinators could employ a specific set of floral cues regardless of environment. Alternatively, wild pollinators could recognize an exclusive signature of cues unique to each environment or flower species. Hoverflies, which are found across the globe, are one of the most ecologically important alternative pollinators after bees and bumblebees. Here, we have exploited their cosmopolitan status to understand how wild pollinator preferences change across different continents. Without employing any a priori assumptions concerning the floral cues, we measured, predicted, and finally artificially recreated multimodal cues from individual flowers visited by hoverflies in three different environments (hemiboreal, alpine, and tropical) using a field-based methodology. We found that although “flower signatures” were unique for each environment, some multimodal lures were ubiquitously attractive, despite not carrying any reward, or resembling real flowers. While it was unexpected that cue combinations found in real flowers were not necessary, the robustness of our lures across insect species and ecologies could reflect a general strategy of resource identification for generalist pollinators. Our results provide insights into how cosmopolitan pollinators such as hoverflies identify flowers and offer specific ecologically based cues and strategies for attracting pollinators across diverse environments.


2016 ◽  
Vol 113 (28) ◽  
pp. E4035-E4042 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anthony D. Vaudo ◽  
Harland M. Patch ◽  
David A. Mortensen ◽  
John F. Tooker ◽  
Christina M. Grozinger

To fuel their activities and rear their offspring, foraging bees must obtain a sufficient quality and quantity of nutritional resources from a diverse plant community. Pollen is the primary source of proteins and lipids for bees, and the concentrations of these nutrients in pollen can vary widely among host-plant species. Therefore we hypothesized that foraging decisions of bumble bees are driven by both the protein and lipid content of pollen. By successively reducing environmental and floral cues, we analyzed pollen-foraging preferences of Bombus impatiens in (i) host-plant species, (ii) pollen isolated from these host-plant species, and (iii) nutritionally modified single-source pollen diets encompassing a range of protein and lipid concentrations. In our semifield experiments, B. impatiens foragers exponentially increased their foraging rates of pollen from plant species with high protein:lipid (P:L) ratios; the most preferred plant species had the highest ratio (∼4.6:1). These preferences were confirmed in cage studies where, in pairwise comparisons in the absence of other floral cues, B. impatiens workers still preferred pollen with higher P:L ratios. Finally, when presented with nutritionally modified pollen, workers were most attracted to pollen with P:L ratios of 5:1 and 10:1, but increasing the protein or lipid concentration (while leaving ratios intact) reduced attraction. Thus, macronutritional ratios appear to be a primary factor driving bee pollen-foraging behavior and may explain observed patterns of host-plant visitation across the landscape. The nutritional quality of pollen resources should be taken into consideration when designing conservation habitats supporting bee populations.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document