Mieloma múltiple IgE: detección y seguimiento

Resumen Objetivos Aportar un nuevo caso de mieloma múltiple por inmunoglobulina E (IgE), isotipo muy infrecuente ya que representa <0,1% de todos los pacientes con esta gammapatía monoclonal. Destacar la importancia del estudio de proteínas con una correcta detección, cuantificación e identificación del componente monoclonal, así como las principales consideraciones a tener en cuenta en el laboratorio clínico para un adecuado abordaje. Caso clínico Paciente varón de 45 años que, tras presentar dolor intenso en el codo de 5 semanas de evolución, es diagnosticado de mieloma múltiple IgE-Kappa gracias a las pruebas de laboratorio, junto con el análisis radiológico y de la médula ósea. Como tratamiento, el paciente recibe un esquema de inducción quimioterapéutico antes de someterse a un trasplante autólogo de progenitores hematopoyéticos. Actualmente continúa en seguimiento. Conclusiones El estudio de proteínas por parte del laboratorio clínico a través del proteinograma y la inmunofijación han permitido detectar un componente monoclonal de tipo IgE-Kappa en un paciente antes de que presentara una sintomatología CRAB (hipercalcemia, afectación renal, anemia y dolor óseo) clásica asociada al mieloma múltiple, ayudando a un diagnóstico y tratamiento precoz.

Impact of Hypoxia-Inducible Factor Prolyl Hydroxylase Inhibitor on Renal Function in Patient with Heart Failure

Hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase (HIF-PH) inhibitor is a recently introduced oral agent to treat renal anemia, but its clinical implications on renal functioning in patients with heart failure remains unknown. We studied an 81-year-old man with heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction, chronic kidney disease, and renal anemia. The seven-month HIF-PH inhibitor daprodustat treatment improved the hemoglobin level from 7.4 g/dL to 11.8 g/dL and estimated glomerular filtration ratio from 24 mL/min/1.73 m2 to 35 mL/min/1.73 m2 without any complications, including thromboembolic events. HIF-PH inhibitor might be a promising therapeutic tool to improve renal anemia and renal function in patients with heart failure, although large-scale studies are warranted to validate our findings.

Impact of Hypoxia-Inducible Factor Prolyl Hydroxylase Inhibitor on Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction

Hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase (HIF-PH) inhibitor is a recently introduced oral medication to treat renal anemia, but its clinical implication in patients with heart failure, particularly heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), remains unknown. We had a 91-year-old woman with HFpEF who was admitted to our institute to treat her worsening heart failure. She initiated HIF-PH inhibitor daprodustat to treat her renal anemia (hemoglobin 8.8 g/dL and estimated glomerular filtration ratio 15.6 mL/min/1.73 m2). Following a 6-month treatment with daprodustat, hemoglobin increased up to 10.4 g/dL, left ventricular mass index decreased from 107 g/m2 to 88 g/m2, and plasma B-type natriuretic peptide decreased from 276 pg/mL to 122 pg/mL, despite doses of other medications remaining unchanged. HIF-PH inhibitors might be a promising tool to ameliorate renal anemia and facilitate cardiac reverse remodeling in patients with HFpEF.

Efficacy and Safety of Molidustat for Anemia in ESA-Naive Nondialysis Patients: A Randomized, Phase 3 Trial

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Molidustat is an oral hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase inhibitor that predominantly induces renal production of erythropoietin (EPO). Molidustat was evaluated for the treatment of anemia associated with chronic kidney disease (CKD) in the “Molidustat Once Daily Improves Renal Anemia by Inducing EPO” (MIYABI) program, which comprises 5 phase 3 clinical trials. The present MIYABI Non-Dialysis Correction (ND-C) study investigated the efficacy and safety of molidustat in Japanese patients with renal anemia who were not undergoing dialysis and were not receiving erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA) treatment. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> This was a 52-week, randomized (1:1), open-label, active-control, parallel-group, multicenter, phase 3 study in Japanese patients with renal anemia associated with CKD (stages 3–5). Molidustat or the ESA darbepoetin alfa (hereinafter referred to as darbepoetin) were initiated at 25 mg once daily or 30 μg every 2 weeks, respectively, and doses were regularly titrated to correct and to maintain hemoglobin (Hb) levels in the target range of ≥11.0 g/dL and &#x3c;13.0 g/dL. The primary efficacy outcome was the mean Hb level and its change from baseline during the evaluation period (weeks 30–36). The safety outcomes included evaluation of all adverse events. <b><i>Results:</i></b> In total, 162 patients were randomized to receive molidustat (<i>n</i> = 82) or darbepoetin (<i>n</i> = 80). Baseline characteristics were generally well balanced between treatment groups. The mean (standard deviation) Hb levels at baseline were 9.84 (0.64) g/dL for molidustat and 10.00 (0.61) g/dL for darbepoetin. The mean (95% confidence interval [CI]) for mean Hb levels during the evaluation period for molidustat (11.28 [11.07, 11.50] g/dL) and darbepoetin (11.70 [11.50, 11.90] g/dL) was within the target range. Based on a noninferiority margin of 1.0 g/dL, molidustat was noninferior to darbepoetin in the change in mean Hb level during the evaluation period from baseline; the least-squares mean (95% CI) difference (molidustat-darbepoetin) was −0.38 (−0.67, −0.08) g/dL. The proportion of patients who reported at least 1 treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was 93.9% for molidustat and 93.7% for darbepoetin. Most TEAEs were mild (54.9% for molidustat and 63.3% for darbepoetin) or moderate (22.0% for molidustat and 22.8% for darbepoetin) in intensity. There were 3 deaths in the molidustat group and 1 in the darbepoetin group. <b><i>Discussion/Conclusion:</i></b> In the MIYABI ND-C study, molidustat appeared to be an efficacious and generally well-tolerated alternative to darbepoetin for the treatment of renal anemia in Japanese patients who were not undergoing dialysis and were not receiving ESA treatment.