Fact or fiction?

Many studies have claimed to find that reading fiction leads to improvements in social cognition. But this work has left open the critical question of whether any type of narrative, fictional or nonfictional, might have similar effects. To address this question, as well as to test whether framing a narrative as fiction matters, the current studies presented participants (N = 268 in Study 1; N = 362 in Study 2) with literary fiction texts, narrative nonfiction texts, expository nonfiction texts, or no texts. We tested their theory-of-mind abilities using the picture-based Reading the Mind in the Eyes task and a text-based test of higher-order social cognition. Reading anything was associated with higher scores compared to reading nothing, but the effects of framing and text type were inconsistent. These results suggest that prior claims regarding positive effects of reading fiction on mentalizing should be seen as tenuous; other mechanisms may be driving previously published effects.

Mind Reading in Films Task to Assess Social Cognitive Deficits in Autism Spectrum Conditions

"Background and Objectives. Various tasks with a variety of stimuli have been devised to measure aspects of theory of mind. In the present study, with due consideration of Iranian culture, we introduce a sensitive video-based test, called Mind Reading in Films Task (Films Task), for the evaluation of complex emotions and mental states. This new social ecological task for mindreading comprises several short film scenes, some measuring cognitive theory of mind and some measuring affective theory of mind. Method. This study included two experiments. In experiment 1, the validity of the newly devised Films Task was investigated by comparing the responses of 342 students to the Films Task and to the Reading the Mind in the Eyes Task (Eyes Test). In experiment 2, the predictive power and sensitivity of the Films Task was assessed. Twenty adults with high functioning autism spectrum conditions (ASC) were compared with 20 matched healthy controls in terms of their responses to the Eyes Task, Films Task and Empathy Quotient questionnaire. The ROC curve was used to determine the best cut-off point and the diagnostic value. Results. Our findings substantiate the discriminative capacity of the Films Task to distinguish individuals with autism spectrum conditions from their healthy non-clinical counterparts. Limitations: Intelligence and comorbid psychiatric conditions were not controlled, limiting the utility of the measure. Conclusions. Results imply the potential utility of the Films Task as a viable alternative to the Eyes Task in measuring individual differences in social cognitive ability in the general population."

S50. COGNITION AND EMOTION REGULATION IN SCHIZOPHRENIA PATIENTS WITH A HISTORY OF AGGRESSION

Background Studies have shown a convergence of neural systems implicated in cognitive control and social emotional functions with mechanisms involved in emotion regulation, awareness, and impulsive aggression. In a sample of patients with a history of aggression, we examined the association of cognitive and social cognitive functions with emotion regulation capacity, emotional awareness, impulse control, and aggression. Methods Participants were 78 individuals with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder that participated in a cognitive training study. Emotion regulation capacity was indexed by obtaining participants’ heart rate variability (HRV), respiration, and skin conductance while participants viewed pictures selected from the International Affective Picture System (IAPS). Three blocks of pictures were presented—a neutral block depicting pictures of everyday objects preceded by audio recordings of their description; an emotionally-evocative block preceded by their description, and a reappraisal block of emotionally-evocative pictures preceded by reappraisal statements. A subset of participants (N=37) completed the emotion regulation task. The MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB), the Reading the Mind in the Eyes Task (Eyes Task), and the Emotion Recognition-40 (ER-40) were administered to assess cognitive functioning, mentalizing, and facial affect recognition respectively. Negative affectivity was captured using the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) whereas aggression was measured with the Taylor Aggression Paradigm (TAP) and the Overt Aggression Scale Modified (OAS-M). In a smaller subsample of 12 individuals, we performed analyses of activation patterns during the performance of the emotion regulation task. Regions of interest (ROI) included the dACC, DLPFC, VLPFC, vmPFC, left and right amygdala, and the subcallosal cingulate. We created a regional mask of the cognitive control and emotional appraisal regions for event-related fMRI. Results There were inverse associations between performance on the MCCB and the Eyes Task and indices of emotion regulation capacity—in particular, significant associations were obtained with Low Frequency/High Frequency HRV ratio (r=-0.324, p<0.05) and SCL (r=-0.331, p<0.05). Both HRV and respiration measures were inversely correlated with aggression measured with the TAP suggesting an association between reduced emotion regulation capacity and a risk for aggression. There were inverse associations between activation within the event-related regional mask and low frequency/high frequency heart rate variability ratio at rest (r=-0.504, p=0.095) and during the viewing of emotionally-evocative pictures (r = -0.264, p=0.36). Associations with HRV were especially remarkable for the dorsomedial, ventrolateral, and right amygdala regions. Remarkably, increased activation in the regional mask when reappraisal statements were provided with emotionally-evocative pictures was inversely correlated with the life history of aggression LHA (r=-0.32, p=0.28, n=14) and OAS (r=-0.284, p=0.34, n=14) aggression scores. This pattern was present when the dACC, right and left amygdala, DLPFC, VLPFC, and the subcallosal cingulate were set as the seed region. Discussion The results show an association between cognitive functions and emotion regulation capacity indexed by measuring physiological arousal during the performance of the picture viewing task. Emotion regulation capacity also showed significant association with aggression. Deficits in cognitive and social cognitive abilities may contribute to and be viable targets for improving emotion regulation capacity and decreasing aggression risk.