metabolite measurement
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

33
(FIVE YEARS 7)

H-INDEX

7
(FIVE YEARS 1)

Endocrinology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jinhwan Lim ◽  
Aramandla Ramesh ◽  
Toshi Shioda ◽  
Kathleen Leon ◽  
Ulrike Luderer

Abstract Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons like benzo[a]pyrene (BaP) are generated during incomplete combustion of organic materials. Prior research has demonstrated that BaP is a prenatal ovarian toxicant and carcinogen. However, the metabolic pathways active in the embryo and its developing gonads and the mechanisms by which prenatal exposure to BaP predisposes to ovarian tumors later in life remain to be fully elucidated. To address these data gaps, we orally dosed pregnant female mice with BaP from E6.5-11.5 (0, 0.2 or 2 mg/kg-day) for metabolite measurement or E9.5-11.5 (0 or 3.33 mg/kg-day) for embryonic gonad RNA-sequencing. Embryos were harvested at E13.5 for both experiments. The sum of BaP metabolite concentrations increased significantly with dose in the embryos and placentas, and concentrations were significantly higher in female than male embryos and in embryos than placentas. RNA sequencing revealed that enzymes involved in metabolic activation of BaP are expressed at moderate to high levels in embryonic gonads and that greater transcriptomic changes occurred in the ovaries in response to BaP than in the testes. We identified 490 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) with FDR p-values <0.05 when comparing BaP-exposed to control ovaries, but no statistically significant DEGs between BaP-exposed and control testes. Genes related to monocyte/macrophage recruitment and activity, prolactin family genes, and several keratin genes were among the most upregulated genes in the BaP-exposed ovaries. Results show that developing ovaries are more sensitive than testes to prenatal BaP exposure, which may be related to higher concentrations of BaP metabolites in female embryos.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ana Arnanz ◽  
Neelke De Munck ◽  
Ibrahim El Khatib ◽  
Aşina Bayram ◽  
Andrea Abdala ◽  
...  

ContextThe widespread distribution of the Vitamin D (VitD) receptor in reproductive tissues suggests an important role for VitD in human reproduction. The assessment of patient´s VitD is based on the 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) metabolite measurement. However, most of the circulating 25(OH)D is bound to either VitD-binding protein (VDBP) (88%) or albumin (12%) and less than 1% circulates free.ObjectiveTo determine a possible correlation between VitD levels in serum (S) and follicular fluid (FF) and blastocyst ploidy status in patients undergoing infertility treatment.MethodsA prospective observational study was performed including couples planned for preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (PGT-A) from ART Fertility Clinics. Patients were classified according to their 25(OH)D-Serum levels: VitD deficient group <20 ng/ml and insufficient/replete ≥20 ng/ml defined as VitD non-deficient group.ResultsSerum samples and 226 FF from individual follicles were collected for 25(OH)D, bioavailable 25(OH)D, free 25(OH)D, and % free 25(OH)D measurement. 25(OH)D-Serum in VitD deficient and non-deficient were 13.2±4.0 ng/ml vs 32.3±9.2 ng/ml; p<0.001. FF from 40 and 74 biopsied blastocysts was analysed of which 52.5 and 60.8% were euploid (p = 0.428), respectively. In VitD deficient patients, mean 25(OH)D-FF, bioavailable 25(OH)D-FF, and free 25(OH)D-FF were higher in euploid vs aneuploid blastocysts (18.3±6.3 ng/ml vs 13.9±4.8 ng/ml; p = 0.040; 1.5±0.5 ng/ml vs 1.1±0.4 ng/ml; p = 0.015; 0.005±0.002 ng/ml vs 0.003±0.001 ng/ml; p = 0.023, respectively), whilst no differences were found in VitD non-deficient patients (37.9±12.3 ng/ml vs 40.6±13.7 ng/ml; p = 0.380; 3.1±1.1 ng/ml vs 3.3±1.2 ng/ml; p = 0.323; 0.01±0.003 ng/ml vs 0.01±0.004 ng/ml; p = 0.319, respectively).ConclusionVitD non-deficient patients have a significantly higher probability of obtaining a euploid blastocyst compared to VitD deficient patients (OR:33.36, p = 0.002).


2019 ◽  
Vol 280 ◽  
pp. 91-96 ◽  
Author(s):  
Micaela B. Ruiz ◽  
Gabina V. Eguizábal ◽  
Daniel P. Villarreal ◽  
Juan M. Busso ◽  
Abel G. López

2018 ◽  
Vol 41 (10) ◽  
pp. 629-635
Author(s):  
Eugenia Sánchez Rodríguez ◽  
Raquel Ríos León ◽  
Francisco Mesonero Gismero ◽  
Agustín Albillos ◽  
Antonio Lopez-Sanroman

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document