resonance current
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

52
(FIVE YEARS 13)

H-INDEX

7
(FIVE YEARS 1)

NeuroImage ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 243 ◽  
pp. 118517
Author(s):  
Hasan H. Eroğlu ◽  
Oula Puonti ◽  
Cihan Göksu ◽  
Fróði Gregersen ◽  
Hartwig R. Siebner ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (6) ◽  
pp. 1591-1592
Author(s):  
Hasan H. Eroglu ◽  
Oula Puonti ◽  
Cihan Göksu ◽  
Fróði Gregersen ◽  
Hartwig R. Siebner ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hasan H. Eroğlu ◽  
Oula Puonti ◽  
Cihan Göksu ◽  
Fróði Gregersen ◽  
Hartwig R. Siebner ◽  
...  

ABSTRACTMagnetic resonance current density imaging (MRCDI) of the human brain aims to reconstruct the current density distribution caused by transcranial electric stimulation from MR-based measurements of the current-induced magnetic fields. The reconstruction problem is challenging due to a low signal-to-noise ratio and a limited volume coverage of the MR-based measurements, the lack of data from the scalp and skull regions and because MRCDI is only sensitive to the component of the current-induced magnetic field parallel to the scanner field. Most existing reconstruction approaches have been validated using simulation studies and measurements in phantoms with simplified geometries. Only one reconstruction method, the projected current density algorithm, has been applied to human in-vivo data so far, however resulting in blurred current density estimates even when applied to noise-free simulated data.We analyze the underlying causes for the limited performance of the projected current density algorithm when applied to human brain data. In addition, we compare it with an approach that relies on the optimization of the conductivities of a small number of tissue compartments of anatomically detailed head models reconstructed from structural MR data. Both for simulated ground truth data and human in-vivo MRCDI data, our results indicate that the estimation of current densities benefits more from using a personalized volume conductor model than from applying the projected current density algorithm. In particular, we introduce a hierarchical statistical testing approach as a principled way to test and compare the quality of reconstructed current density images that accounts for the limited signal-to-noise ratio of the human in-vivo MRCDI data and the fact that the ground truth of the current density is unknown for measured data. Our results indicate that the statistical testing approach constitutes a valuable framework for the further development of accurate volume conductor models of the head. Our findings also highlight the importance of tailoring the reconstruction approaches to the quality and specific properties of the available data.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cihan Goksu ◽  
Klaus Scheffler ◽  
Frodi Gregersen ◽  
Hasan H Eroglu ◽  
Rahel Heule ◽  
...  

Purpose: Magnetic resonance current density imaging (MRCDI) combines MR brain imaging with the injection of time-varying weak currents (1-2 mA) to assess the current flow pattern in the brain. However, the utility of MRCDI is still hampered by low measurement sensitivity and poor image quality. Methods: We recently introduced a multi-gradient-echo-based MRCDI approach that has the hitherto best documented efficiency. We now advanced our MRCDI approach in three directions and performed phantom and in-vivo human brain experiments for validation: First, we verified the importance of enhanced spoiling and optimize it for imaging of the human brain. Second, we improved the sensitivity and spatial resolution by using acquisition weighting. Third, we added navigators as a quality control measure for tracking physiological noise. Combining these advancements, we tested our optimized MRCDI method by using 1 mA transcranial electrical stimulation (TES) currents injected via two different electrode montages in five subjects. Results: For a session duration of 4:20 min, the new MRCDI method was able to detect magnetic field changes caused by the TES current flow at a sensitivity level of 84 pT, representing in a twofold increase relative to our original method. Comparing both methods to current flow simulations based on personalized head models demonstrated a consistent increase in the coefficient of determination of ∆R2=0.12 for the current-induced magnetic fields and ∆R2=0.22 for the current flow reconstructions. Interestingly, some of the simulations still clearly deviated from the measurements despite of the strongly improved measurement quality. This suggests that MRCDI can reveal useful information for the improvement of head models used for current flow simulations. Conclusion: The advanced method strongly improves the sensitivity and robustness of MRCDI and is an important step from proof-of-concept studies towards a broader application of MRCDI in clinical and basic neuroscience research.


2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-13
Author(s):  
Jing Lu ◽  
Xiangqian Tong ◽  
Ming Shen ◽  
Jun Yin ◽  
Yongtao Yuan

The new L-LLC resonant bidirectional DC-DC converter (L-LLC-BDC) will produce a large resonance current and voltage inrush during the startup, posing a threat to the safe operation of the power device. Although a very high starting frequency can effectively suppress the inrush, it will also increase the output current demand of the driving ICs. This paper proposes a phase-shifting soft-start control strategy based on the current-limiting curve. Using operating mode analysis, the peak value of the resonant current is limited according to the output voltage and the phase shift angle of the switch, with the limit current curve at the startup stage drawn. By this current curve, a one-to-one correspondence between the output voltage and the phase shift angle of the switch is obtained. The phase-shifted soft-start control strategy can quickly establish the output voltage on the basis of a resonant frequency and can effectively suppress the resonance current inrush. An experimental prototype with a power of 6 kW and an input of 760 V and an output of 380 V is built. The experimental results prove the correctness and effectiveness of the soft start control strategy proposed in this paper.


Author(s):  
Chenghui Zhang ◽  
Xiaoyan Li ◽  
Xiangyang Xing ◽  
Boxue Zhang ◽  
Rui Zhang ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document